Abstract
This chapter will address the ethical responsibility aspects of funders, from the perspective of project management, with the government context as the focus. From this perspective, the managers face significant challenges and dilemmas, since they are required to conduct themselves professionally and make decisions regarding ethical performance on a day-to-day basis, which is not easy to manage, even less so when.
On the one hand, there is no common ethical action guide for the institutions – public and private – with which projects are linked and articulated; and on the other hand, in the existing documents or ethical frameworks to which they must be subjected, they are not considered situations or circumstances in which they must exercise their judgment. It is understood that it is through public projects with the social value that the future is outlined for the benefit of citizens, where governmental organizations, companies, economic, material, human, and intellectual resources are also articulated.
In the current context in which projects are developed, the resulting social value does not coincide with the expected value; the initial requirements diverge from the results regarding compliance with the technical and management standards required; also, the motivations and conduct of the people involved in the projects could be incompatible about social conscience, the common good, and the adoption of codes of ethics.
Most of the projects and their management have not yet managed to offer the expected value or satisfy the expectations. The results of these projects kind, often, carry on tremendous economic, financial, political, and social impact. Therefore, the field of project management has faced for years, and since its creation, questions related to the contrast between theory and rigor of practice, technical relevance, organizational philosophy, behavior, and social consciousness of practitioners.
Due to the above, this chapter devotes attention to the standard in project management, the ethics code, and action guides linked to the public sector.
References
Al Hosban AA (2015) The role of regulations and ethics auditing to cope with information technology governance from point view internal auditors. Int J Econ Financ 7(1):167–176. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v7n1p167
Alemán Bracho C, Garcés Ferrer J (1998) Política social (ed: Casado Lumbreras C) (Primera). McGraw Hill, Madrid. http://biblioteca.usco.edu.co/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=8430. Accessed 10 Sept 2019
Altamirano Sanchez Y-A (2018) Director de proyectos: retos éticos en el contexto gubernamental. Tesis de Doctorado, México. https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/80465. Accessed 10 Sept 2019
Brunel S, Guerre S (2005) Les ambiguïtés du développement durable. Sci Humaines (49):2–7. Recuperado a partir de. http://wwwscienceshumainescom/articleprint2php?lg=fr&id_article=13912. Accessed 10 Sept 2019
Buira A, North DC (2007) Las instituciones de Bretton Woods: ¿ gobierno sin legitimidad ? economia unam, 4 No 010, 30–61. http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/ecu/article/view/2902. Accessed 10 Sept 2019
Canto-Sperber M (2001) Diccionario de ética y de filosofía moral. Tomo I A-J (Primera re). Fondo de Cultura Económica, México
Cardozo Brum MI (2006) Evaluacion de politicas y programas publicos: El caso de los programas de desarrollo social en México. Cámara de Diputados–Porrúa, México. http://biblioteca.diputados.gob.mx/janium/bv/ce/scpd/LIX/eval_pol_prog_pub.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2019
Dávila JJT (2005) Las instituciones de bretton Woods: 60 años de cambios. ICE (827):1–8. http://www.revistasice.com/cmsrevistasICE/pdfs/ICE_827_17-24__01B50204EBAC368AB094AD82C24909F8.pdf%5Cn http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=1709055&orden=1&info=link. Accessed 10 Sept 2019
Díez Martín F, Blanco González A, Prado Román C (2010) Medición de la legitimidad organizativa: El caso de las Sociedades de Garantía Recíproca. Cuad Econ Dir Empresa 13(43):115–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1138-5758(10)70012-
García Sánchez E (2009) Diccionario Crítico de Ciencias Sociales. Terminología Científico-Social (ed: Reyes R) Nómadas. Revista Crítica de Ciencias Sociales y Jurídicas. http://pendientedemigracion.ucm.es/info/eurotheo/diccionario/M/metaevaluacion.htm. Accessed 10 Sept 2019
Garza JG (2000) Administración contemporanea (ed: Rodríguez Olvera MA) (Segunda). McGraw-Hill Interamericana Editores, México
Guerrero O (2000) Teoría administrativa del estado (ed: Giambruno Roca S) (Primera). Oxford University Press, México. http://www.omarguerrero.org/libros/TAE.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2019
Hellriegel D, Jackson SE, Slocum J (2009) Administración un enfoque basado en competencias. (ed: Rosas López, M) (Onceava). Cengage Learning, México, D.F.
Hernández S (2002) Administración: pensamiento, proceso, estrategia y vanguardia (ed: Sánchez Navarrete OA) (Primera). McGraw-Hill Interamericana Editores, México
Herrera A, Didriksson A (2006) Manual de planeación prospectiva estratégica: su aplicación a instituciones de educación superior. (ed: Paniagua,MI; Diaz Cañas, E) (Primera). Centro de Estudios sobre la Universidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D.F.
House ER (1993) Professional Evaluation: Social Impact and Political Consequences. Sage, Newbury Park, Calif
Information Systems Audit and Control Association (2010) ISACA fact sheet. Recovered from http://www.isaca.org/about-isaca/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed 10 Sept 2019
Macedo FC (2019) Jerarquización Vectorial: Una propuesta de evaluación jerárquica multi-criterio para proyectos sociales sustentables. Paper presented at 1er. Congreso Internacional En Evaluación Y Dirección Ética De Proyectos Públicos Y Sociales, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Aragón, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Estado de México, 26–28 September 2019
Meixueiro J, Pérez M (2008) Metodología General Para La Evaluación De Proyectos. Banco Nacional de Obras y Servicios Públicos, S.N.C, 30. Recovered from http://www.cepep.gob.mx/work/models/CEPEP/metodologias/documentos/metodologia_general.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2019
Münch GL (2005) Planeación Estratégica: El rumbo hacia el éxito (Primera). Trillas, México, D.F.
Palumbo DJ (1987) The Politics of Program Evaluation. Sage, Beverly Hills
Project Management Institute, Inc (2014) Informe Pulso de la profesión de PMI: Gestión de requisitos: una competencia esencial para el éxito de proyectos y programas. Newtown Square, Pensilvania, EEUU. http://www.pmi.org/~/media/PDF/KnowledgeCenter/Spanish/requirements-management-pulse-report-spanish.ashx. Accessed 10 Sept 2019
Project Management Institute, Inc (2015) In: Cleland DI, Bopaya B (eds) The evolution and maturity of PM. Project Management Institute, Inc, Pennsylvania
Project Management Institute, Inc (2017) Project Manager Competency Development (PMCDF) Framework. Project Management Institute, Inc, Pennsylvania. www.pmi.org. Accessed 10 Sept 2019
Ríos Szalay A, Paniagua Aduna A (2007) Orígenes de la Administración: Tendencias de desarrollo en el sigo XXI (Tercera). Trillas, México
SOX USA (2002) SOX act of 2002. Public Law 2:1–670. http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/107-110.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2019
The World Commission on Environment and Development, WCED (1987) The Brundtland report: ‘Our common future’ United Nations
Velásquez MG (2006) Ética en los negocios: conceptos y casos (Guerrero Rosas PM) (Sexta). Pearson Educación de México, México. www.pearsoneducacion.net/velasquez. Accessed 10 Sept 2019
Weiss CH (1991) Evaluation Research in the Political Context: Sixteen years and four administration later. In (ed: McLoughlin, MW; Phillips, DC) Evaluation and education At quarter century. University of Chicago Press, Chicago IL
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Altamirano Sánchez, Y.A., Macedo Chagolla, F. (2020). Ethical Responsibility of Financiers. In: San-Jose, L., Retolaza, J., van Liedekerke, L. (eds) Handbook on Ethics in Finance. International Handbooks in Business Ethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00001-1_12-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00001-1_12-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00001-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00001-1
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities