Glossary
- Energy from ocean currents:
-
Energy harvested from the continuous and predictable flow of ocean currents near landforms
- Marine and hydrokinetic energy:
-
Energy that can be harvested from moving water, specifically from ocean waves, tides and currents, and river flow. Abbreviated as MHK, other ocean-based energy resources are usually included in this definition, including ocean thermal energy conversion and energy derived from osmotic gradients
- Ocean thermal energy conversion:
-
Energy harvested from the heat differential from cold deep water to warmer surface waters. Abbreviated as OTEC, this energy capture as presently conceived is viable only when a temperature difference of 20 °C or more exists from surface to deep ocean water layers
- Osmotic energy:
-
Energy harvested from the gradient of salt content from saline ocean water to freshwater. It is generally thought to be viable only at river mouths that empty directly into the sea
- Receptors:
-
Terminology for portions of the aquatic...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Boehlert G, McMurray G, Tortorici C (2008) Ecological effects of wave energy development in the Pacific Northwest: a scientific workshop. U.S. Department of Commerce, Seattle, 11–12 Oct 2007
Cada G, Ahlgrimm J, Bahleda M, Bigford T, Stavrakas SD, Hall D, Moursund R, Sale M (2007) Potential impacts of hydrokinetic and wave energy conversion technologies on aquatic environments. Fisheries 32:174–181
Dadswell MJ, Rulifson RA, Daborn GR (1986) Potential impact of large-scale tidal power developments in the upper bay of Fundy on fisheries resources of the northwest Atlantic. Fisheries 11:26–35
Polagye B, Copping A, Kirkendall K, Boehlert G, Walker S, Weinstein M, Cleve BV (2010) Environmental effects of tidal energy development: a scientific workshop. University of Washington, Seattle, 22–24 Mar 2010 (in press)
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (2008) White paper on licensing hydrokinetic pilot projects. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
Michel J, Dunagan H, Boring C, Healy E, Evans W, Dean J, McGillis A, Hain J (2007) Worldwide synthesis and analysis of existing information regarding environmental effects of alternative energy uses on the outer continental shelf. Minerals Management Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC
U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy (2004) An ocean blueprint for the 21st century. Final report, Washington, DC
Electric Power Research Institute (2008) Prioritized research, development, deployment and demonstration (RDD&D) needs: marine and other hydrokinetic renewable energy. EPRI, Palo Alto
U.S. Department of Energy (2009) Report to congress on the potential environmental effects of marine and hydrokinetic energy technologies. Wind and hydropower technologies program. U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC
Copping AE, Geerlofs S (2010) Report on outreach to stakeholders for fiscal year 2009. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Seattle
Bedard R, Previsic M, Hagerman G, Polagye B, Musial W, Klure J, von Jouanne A, Mathur U, Collar C, Hopper C, Amsden S (2007) North American ocean energy status – Mar 2007. In: European wave and tidal energy conference, Porto, pp 1–8
Gill A (2005) Offshore renewable energy: ecological implications of generating electricity in the coastal zone. J Appl Ecol 42:605–615
Dacre SL, Bryden IG, Bullen CR (2002) Environmental impacts and constraints of tidal current energy: the Pentland firth feasibility study. In: Proceedings from MAREC 2002 two day international conference on marine renewable energy, Newcastle
El-Geziry TM, Bryden I, Couch S (2009) Environmental impact assessment for tidal energy schemes: an exemplar case study of the strait of Messina. Proc IMarEST Part A J Mar Eng Technol 13:39–48
Bald J, del Campo A, Franco J, Galparsoro I, González M, Liria P, Muxika I, Rubio A, Solaun O, Uriarte A, Comesaña M, Cacabelos A, Fernández R, Méndez G, Prada D, Zubiate L (2010) Protocol to develop an environmental impact study of wave energy converters AZTI-Tecnalia. Kaia, Herrera
Electrical Power Research Institute (2004) Offshore wave power in the U.S.: Environmental issues. EPRI, Edison
Grecian WJ, Inger R, Attrill MJ, Bearhop S, Godley BJ, Witt MJ, Votier SC (2010) Potential impacts of wave-powered marine renewable energy installations on marine birds. IBIS 152:683–697
Cada G, Copping A, Roberts J. The U.S. Department of Energy’s efforts to identify and resolve environmental impacts of marine and hydrokinetic energy technologies. Hydrovision (in press)
Minerals Management Service, Renewable Energy and Alternate Use Program, U.S. Department of the Interior (2006) Technology white paper on ocean current energy potential on the U.S. outer continental shelf. U.S. Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Renewable Energy and Alternate Use Program, Washington, DC
Coastal Response Research Center (2010) Ocean thermal energy conversion: assessing potential physical, chemical and biological impacts and risks, Durham
Skilhagen SE, Dugstad J, Aaberg R (2008) Osmotic power – power production based on the osmotic pressure difference between waters with varying salt gradients. Desalination 220:476–482
Nelson PA, Behrens D, Castle J, Crawford G, Gaddam RN, Hackett SC, Largier J, Lohse DP, Mills KL, Raimondi PT, Robart M, Sydeman WJ, Thompson SA, Woo S (2008) Developing wave energy in coastal California: potential socio-economic and environmental effects. California Energy Commission, Sacramentro
Ehler C, Douvere F (2009) Marine spatial planning: a step-by-step approach toward ecosystem-based management. UNESCO, Paris
OEER Association (2008) Fundy tidal energy strategic environmental assessment. Final report, Halifax
Shields MA, Dillon LJ, Woolf DK, Ford AT (2009) Strategic priorities for assessing ecological impacts of marine renewable energy devices in the Pentland firth (Scotland, UK). Mar Policy 33:635–642
Copping AE, Van Cleve FB, Anderson RM (2011) Preliminary screening analysis for the environmental risk evaluation system. Evaluating effects of stressors. Environmental effects of marine and hydrokinetic energy. Report to the U.S. department of energy, wind and waterpower program. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Seattle, 53 pp
US Environmental Protection Agency (1998) Guidelines for ecological risk assessment. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
US Environmental Protection Agency (2003) Framework for cumulative risk assessment. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
Musial W (2008) Status of wave and tidal power technologies for the United States. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Copping, A.E. (2018). Marine and Hydrokinetic Energy Environmental Challenges. In: Bronicki, L. (eds) Power Stations Using Locally Available Energy Sources. Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology Series. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7510-5_875
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7510-5_875
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-7509-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-7510-5
eBook Packages: EnergyReference Module Computer Science and Engineering