Skip to main content

Marine and Hydrokinetic Energy Environmental Challenges

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Power Stations Using Locally Available Energy Sources
  • 968 Accesses

  • Originally published in
  • R. A. Meyers (ed.), Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology, © Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2017

Glossary

Energy from ocean currents:

Energy harvested from the continuous and predictable flow of ocean currents near landforms

Marine and hydrokinetic energy:

Energy that can be harvested from moving water, specifically from ocean waves, tides and currents, and river flow. Abbreviated as MHK, other ocean-based energy resources are usually included in this definition, including ocean thermal energy conversion and energy derived from osmotic gradients

Ocean thermal energy conversion:

Energy harvested from the heat differential from cold deep water to warmer surface waters. Abbreviated as OTEC, this energy capture as presently conceived is viable only when a temperature difference of 20 Â°C or more exists from surface to deep ocean water layers

Osmotic energy:

Energy harvested from the gradient of salt content from saline ocean water to freshwater. It is generally thought to be viable only at river mouths that empty directly into the sea

Receptors:

Terminology for portions of the aquatic...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  1. Boehlert G, McMurray G, Tortorici C (2008) Ecological effects of wave energy development in the Pacific Northwest: a scientific workshop. U.S. Department of Commerce, Seattle, 11–12 Oct 2007

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cada G, Ahlgrimm J, Bahleda M, Bigford T, Stavrakas SD, Hall D, Moursund R, Sale M (2007) Potential impacts of hydrokinetic and wave energy conversion technologies on aquatic environments. Fisheries 32:174–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dadswell MJ, Rulifson RA, Daborn GR (1986) Potential impact of large-scale tidal power developments in the upper bay of Fundy on fisheries resources of the northwest Atlantic. Fisheries 11:26–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Polagye B, Copping A, Kirkendall K, Boehlert G, Walker S, Weinstein M, Cleve BV (2010) Environmental effects of tidal energy development: a scientific workshop. University of Washington, Seattle, 22–24 Mar 2010 (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (2008) White paper on licensing hydrokinetic pilot projects. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  6. Michel J, Dunagan H, Boring C, Healy E, Evans W, Dean J, McGillis A, Hain J (2007) Worldwide synthesis and analysis of existing information regarding environmental effects of alternative energy uses on the outer continental shelf. Minerals Management Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  7. U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy (2004) An ocean blueprint for the 21st century. Final report, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  8. Electric Power Research Institute (2008) Prioritized research, development, deployment and demonstration (RDD&D) needs: marine and other hydrokinetic renewable energy. EPRI, Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

  9. U.S. Department of Energy (2009) Report to congress on the potential environmental effects of marine and hydrokinetic energy technologies. Wind and hydropower technologies program. U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  10. Copping AE, Geerlofs S (2010) Report on outreach to stakeholders for fiscal year 2009. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bedard R, Previsic M, Hagerman G, Polagye B, Musial W, Klure J, von Jouanne A, Mathur U, Collar C, Hopper C, Amsden S (2007) North American ocean energy status – Mar 2007. In: European wave and tidal energy conference, Porto, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gill A (2005) Offshore renewable energy: ecological implications of generating electricity in the coastal zone. J Appl Ecol 42:605–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dacre SL, Bryden IG, Bullen CR (2002) Environmental impacts and constraints of tidal current energy: the Pentland firth feasibility study. In: Proceedings from MAREC 2002 two day international conference on marine renewable energy, Newcastle

    Google Scholar 

  14. El-Geziry TM, Bryden I, Couch S (2009) Environmental impact assessment for tidal energy schemes: an exemplar case study of the strait of Messina. Proc IMarEST Part A J Mar Eng Technol 13:39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bald J, del Campo A, Franco J, Galparsoro I, González M, Liria P, Muxika I, Rubio A, Solaun O, Uriarte A, Comesaña M, Cacabelos A, Fernández R, Méndez G, Prada D, Zubiate L (2010) Protocol to develop an environmental impact study of wave energy converters AZTI-Tecnalia. Kaia, Herrera

    Google Scholar 

  16. Electrical Power Research Institute (2004) Offshore wave power in the U.S.: Environmental issues. EPRI, Edison

    Google Scholar 

  17. Grecian WJ, Inger R, Attrill MJ, Bearhop S, Godley BJ, Witt MJ, Votier SC (2010) Potential impacts of wave-powered marine renewable energy installations on marine birds. IBIS 152:683–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cada G, Copping A, Roberts J. The U.S. Department of Energy’s efforts to identify and resolve environmental impacts of marine and hydrokinetic energy technologies. Hydrovision (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Minerals Management Service, Renewable Energy and Alternate Use Program, U.S. Department of the Interior (2006) Technology white paper on ocean current energy potential on the U.S. outer continental shelf. U.S. Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Renewable Energy and Alternate Use Program, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  20. Coastal Response Research Center (2010) Ocean thermal energy conversion: assessing potential physical, chemical and biological impacts and risks, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  21. Skilhagen SE, Dugstad J, Aaberg R (2008) Osmotic power – power production based on the osmotic pressure difference between waters with varying salt gradients. Desalination 220:476–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nelson PA, Behrens D, Castle J, Crawford G, Gaddam RN, Hackett SC, Largier J, Lohse DP, Mills KL, Raimondi PT, Robart M, Sydeman WJ, Thompson SA, Woo S (2008) Developing wave energy in coastal California: potential socio-economic and environmental effects. California Energy Commission, Sacramentro

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ehler C, Douvere F (2009) Marine spatial planning: a step-by-step approach toward ecosystem-based management. UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  24. OEER Association (2008) Fundy tidal energy strategic environmental assessment. Final report, Halifax

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shields MA, Dillon LJ, Woolf DK, Ford AT (2009) Strategic priorities for assessing ecological impacts of marine renewable energy devices in the Pentland firth (Scotland, UK). Mar Policy 33:635–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Copping AE, Van Cleve FB, Anderson RM (2011) Preliminary screening analysis for the environmental risk evaluation system. Evaluating effects of stressors. Environmental effects of marine and hydrokinetic energy. Report to the U.S. department of energy, wind and waterpower program. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Seattle, 53 pp

    Google Scholar 

  27. US Environmental Protection Agency (1998) Guidelines for ecological risk assessment. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  28. US Environmental Protection Agency (2003) Framework for cumulative risk assessment. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  29. Musial W (2008) Status of wave and tidal power technologies for the United States. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea E. Copping .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Copping, A.E. (2018). Marine and Hydrokinetic Energy Environmental Challenges. In: Bronicki, L. (eds) Power Stations Using Locally Available Energy Sources. Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology Series. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7510-5_875

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics