Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining

2018 Edition
| Editors: Reda Alhajj, Jon Rokne

Online Communities

  • Anatoliy Gruzd
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_81




Application programming interface


Computer-mediated communication


Multiple-user domain/a multiplayer, real-time, virtual world


Sense of community


Online communities (also referred to as virtual communities), like their offline counterparts, can be characterized as groups of people who share similar backgrounds, values, or interests and meet regularly. However, the unique characteristic of an online community is that its members form and maintain their relationships via computer-mediated communication (CMC) technologies such as online discussion boards, web blogs, and social media (For consistency, we will use “online communities” throughout this entry instead of using other synonyms.).

An online community can be exclusively “virtual” when members only meet via the Internet or may include both online and face-to-face interactions. Members can interact with each...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Adamic L, Glance N (2005) The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog 2nd annual workshop on the weblogging ecosystem: aggregation, analysis and dynamics. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Link discovery (LinkKDD’05). ACM, New York, pp 36–43.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1134271.1134277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali-Hasan N, Adamic L (2007) Expressing social relationships on the blog through links and comments. In: Proceedings of international conference on weblogs and social media, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson B (1983) Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanchard A (2004) Blogs as virtual communities: identifying a sense of community in the Julie/Julia project. In: Gurak SAL, Johnson L, Ratliff C, Reyman J (eds) Into the blogosphere: rhetoric, community, and culture of weblogs. University of Minnesota, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  5. Chung CJ, Gruzd A, Park HW (2010) Developing an e-research tool for humanities and social sciences: Korean Internet network miner on blogosphere. J Humanit (Open image in new window)60(12):429–446. ISSN 1598–2211Google Scholar
  6. Conover MD, Ratkiewicz J, Goncalves B, Francisco M, Flammini A, Menczer F (2011) Political polarization on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on weblogs and social media (ICWSM 2011), Barcelona, p 8Google Scholar
  7. Ducheneaut N, Yee N, Nickell E, Moore RJ (2006) Alone together? In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, pp 407–416.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124834
  8. Durant KT, McCray AT, Safran C (2010) Social network analysis of an online melanoma discussion group. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc 2010:6–10Google Scholar
  9. Efimova L, Hendrick S (2005) In search for a virtual settlement: an exploration of weblog community boundaries. In: Proceedings of the communities and technologies conference, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  10. Fiore AT, Tiernan SL, Smith MA (2002) Observed behavior and perceived value of authors in usenet newsgroups: bridging the gap. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems: changing our world, changing ourselves, Minneapolis. ACM, New York, pp 323–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gibson D, Kleinberg J, Raghavan P (1998) Inferring web communities from link topology. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on hypertext and hypermedia. ACM, New York, pp 225–234.  https://doi.org/10.1145/276627.276652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gruzd A (2009) Studying collaborative learning using name networks. J Educ Libr Inf Sci 50(4):243–253Google Scholar
  13. Gruzd A, Sedo DR (2012) #1b1t: investigating reading practices at the turn of the twenty-first century. J Stud Book Cult (Special issue on New Studies in the History of Reading) 3(2):34–42.  https://doi.org/10.7202/1009347arCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gruzd A, Wellman B, Takhteyev Y (2011) Imagining Twitter as an imagined community. Am Behav Sci, special issue on imagined communities 55(10):1294–1318.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211409378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gruzd A, Black FA, Le Y, Amos K (2012) Investigating biomedical research literature in the blogosphere: a case study of diabetes and HbA1c. J Med Libr Assoc 100(1).  https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.100.1.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harrison R (2009) Excavating second life: cyber-archaeologies, heritage and virtual communities. J Mater Cult 14(1):75–106.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183508100009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haythornthwaite C, Wellman B (1998) Work, friendship, and media use for information exchange in a networked organization. J Am Soc Inf Sci 49(12):1101–1114.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1998) 49:12<1101::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-ZCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hogan B (2008) Analyzing social networks via the Internet. In: Fielding N, Lee RM, Blank G (eds) Sage handbook of online research methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 141–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Iba T, Nemoto K, Peters B, Gloor PA (2010) Analyzing the creative editing behavior of Wikipedia editors. Procedia 2(4):6441–6456.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.04.054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Iriberri A, Leroy G (2009) A life-cycle perspective on online community success. ACM Comput Surv 41(2):1–29.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1459352.1459356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones Q (1997) Virtual communities, virtual settlements and cyber-archaeology. J Comput Mediat Commun 3(3)Google Scholar
  22. Klausen J, Barbieri E, Reichlin-Melnick A, Zelin A (2012) The YouTube jihadists: a social network analysis of Al-Muhajiroun’s propaganda campaign. Perspect Terror 6(1). Retrieved from http://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/klausen-et-al-youtube-jihadists
  23. Liang H, Xu Y, Li Y, Nayak R, Tao X (2010) Connecting users and items with weighted tags for personalized item recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM conference on hypertext and hypermedia, ACM, pp 51–60.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1810617.1810628
  24. Marvin L (1995) Spoof, spam, lurk and lag: the aesthetics of text-based virtual realities. J Comput-Mediat Commun 1(2)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McMillan DW, Chavis DM (1986) Sense of community: a definition and theory. J Community Psychol 14(1):6–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mockus A, Fielding RT, Andersen H (2002) Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol 11(3):309–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nonnecke B, Preece J (2000) Lurker demographics. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, pp 73–80.  https://doi.org/10.1145/332040.332409
  28. Otte E, Rousseau R (2002) Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. J Inf Sci 28(6):441–453.  https://doi.org/10.1177/016555150202800601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Papadopoulos S, Kompatsiaris Y, Vakali A, Spyridonos P (2011) Community detection in social media. Data Min Knowl Disc 24(3):515–554.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-011-0224-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pikas CK (2008) Detecting communities in science blogs. In: Proceedings of the 2008 4th IEEE international conference on e-science, IEEE, pp 95–102.  https://doi.org/10.1109/eScience.2008.30
  31. Porter CE (2004) A typology of virtual communities: a multi-disciplinary foundation for future research. J Comput-Mediat Commun 10(1)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Quan-Haase A, Wellman B (2005) Local virtuality in an organization: implications for community of practice. In: Besselaar P, Michelis G, Preece J, Simone C (eds) Communities and technologies 2005, Milano. Springer, Heidelberg/Berlin, pp 215–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sen S, Lam SK, Rashid AM, Cosley D, Frankowski D, Osterhouse J, Harper FM et al (2006) Tagging, communities, vocabulary, evolution. In: Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on computer supported cooperative work (CSCW’06). ACM, New York, pp 181–190.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1180875.1180904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stanoevska-Slabeva K, Schmid BF (2001) A typology of online communities and community supporting platforms. In: Proceedings of the 34th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences. IEEE Comput Soc 10.  https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2001.927041
  35. Suznjevic M, Dobrijevic O, Matijasevic M (2009) Hack, slash, and chat: a study of players’ behavior and communication in MMORPGs. In: Proceedings of the 8th annual workshop on network and systems support for games, Paris. IEEE, Piscataway, Article 2, p 6Google Scholar
  36. Takhteyev Y, Gruzd A, Wellman B (2012) Geography of Twitter networks. Soc Netw 34(1):73–81. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2011.05.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wellman B (2001) Physical place and cyberplace: the rise of personalized networking. Int J Urban Reg Res 25(2):227–252.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wellman B, Leighton B (1979) Networks, neighborhoods and communities. Urban Aff Quart 14:363–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilson RE, Gosling SD, Graham LT (2012) A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspect Psychol Sci 7(3):203–220.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612442904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhu Y (2010) Measurement and analysis of an online content voting network. In: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World Wide Web, ACM, p 1039.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1772690.1772796

Recommended Reading

  1. Adamic LA, Zhang J, Bakshy E, Ackerman MS (2008) Knowledge sharing and Yahoo answers. In: Proceeding of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web, ACM, p 665.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1367497.1367587
  2. Blanchard A, Markus L (2004) The experienced “sense” of a virtual community: characteristics and processes. SIGMIS Database 35(1):64–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyd DM, Ellison NB (2007) Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. J Comput-Mediat Commun 13(1)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brooks B, Welser HT, Hogan B, Titsworth S (2011) Socioeconomic status updates. Inf Commun Soc 14(4):529–549.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.562221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butler BS (2001) Membership size, communication activity, and sustainability: a resource-based model of online social structures. Inf Syst Res 12(4):346–362.  https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.12.4.346.9703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chin A, Chignell M (2007) Identifying communities in blogs: roles for social network analysis and survey instruments. Int J Web Based Commun 3(3):343–365Google Scholar
  7. Cho H, Gay G, Davidson B, Ingraffea A (2007) Social networks, communication styles, and learning performance in a CSCL community. Comput Educ 49(2):309–329.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.07.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dean J, Henzinger MR (1999) Finding related pages in the World Wide Web. Comput Netw 31(11–16):1467–1479.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1286(99)00022-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferrari L, Rosi A, Mamei M, Zambonelli F (2011) Extracting urban patterns from location-based social networks. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSPATIAL international workshop on location-based social networks. ACM, New York, pp 9–16.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2063212.2063226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gjoka M, Kurant M, Butts CT, Markopoulou A (2011) Practical recommendations on crawling online social networks. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 29(9):1872–1892.  https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2011.111011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Golder SA, Bernardo A (2006) Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. J Inf Sci 32(2):198–208.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506062337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gopal S (2007) The evolving social geography of blogs. In: Miller HJ (ed) Societies and cities in the age of instant access, vol 88. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 275–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gruzd A (2009) Automated discovery of emerging online communities among blog readers: a case study of a Canadian real estate blog. In: Proceedings of the Internet research 10.0 conference, Milwaukee, 7–11 Oct 2009Google Scholar
  14. Haythornthwaite C (2002) Strong, weak, and latent ties and the impact of new media. Inf Soc 18(5):385–401.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240290108195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haythornthwaite C, Gruzd A (2007) A noun phrase analysis tool for mining online community. In: Steinfield C, Pentland B, Ackerman M, Contractor N (eds) Communities and technologies 2007: proceedings of the third communities and technologies conference, Michigan State University 2007, Springer, pp 67–86.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-905-7_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haythornthwaite C, Gruzd A (2008) Analyzing networked learning texts. In: Proceedings of networked learning conference, Halkidiki, 5–6 May 2008, pp 136–143Google Scholar
  17. Hogan B (2010) Analyzing Facebook networks. In: Hansen D, Smith M, Shneiderman B (eds) Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL. Morgan Kaufman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Koh J, Kim YG (2004) Knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an e-business perspective. Expert Syst Appl 26(2):155–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Korfiatis NT, Poulos M, Bokos G (2006) Evaluating authoritative sources using social networks: an insight from Wikipedia. Online Inf Rev 30(3):252–262.  https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520610675780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kumar R, Novak J, Tomkins A (2010) Structure and evolution of online social networks. In: Yu PS, Han J, Faloutsos C (eds) Link mining: models, algorithms, and applications. Springer, New York, pp 337–357.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6515-8_13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nazir A, Raza S, Chuah CN (2008) Unveiling Facebook. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement. ACM, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1452520.1452527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Priedhorsky R, Chen J, Lam S, Tony K, Panciera K, Terveen L, Riedl J (2007) Creating, destroying, and restoring value in Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM conference on supporting group work (GROUP’07). ACM, New York, pp 259–268.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1316624.1316663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Reyes P, Tchounikine P (2003) Supporting emergence of threaded learning conversations through augmenting interactional and sequential coherence. In: Proceedings of the international conference on computer supported collaborative learning, Bergen, pp 83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Scellato S, Noulas A, Mascolo C (2011) Exploiting place features in link prediction on location-based social networks. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, ACM, pp 1046–1054.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2020408.2020575
  25. Schenkel R, Crecelius T, Kacimi M, Michel S, Neumann T, Parreira JX, Weikum G (2008) Efficient top-k querying over social-tagging networks. In: Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, ACM, pp 523–530.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1390334.1390424
  26. Schneider F, Feldmann A, Krishnamurthy B, Willinger W (2009) Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement conference (IMC’09). ACM, New York, pp 35–48.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1644893.1644899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Warmbrodt J, Sheng H, Hall R (2008) Social network analysis of video bloggers’ community. In: Proceedings of the 41st annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, IEEE, pp 291–291.  https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2008.402
  28. Whittaker S, Terveen L, Hill W, Cherny L (1998) The dynamics of mass interaction. In: Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, ACM, pp 257–264.  https://doi.org/10.1145/289444.289500
  29. Zimmer M (2010) But the data is already public’: on the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics Inf Technol 12(4):313–325.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9227-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ted Rogers School of ManagementRyerson UniversityTorontoCanada

Section editors and affiliations

  • Talel Abdessalem
    • 1
  • Rokia Missaoui
    • 2
  1. 1.telecom-paristechParisFrance
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringUniversité du Québec en Outaouais (UQO)GatineauCanada