Evidence-Based Family Medicine

Living reference work entry

Abstract

Medicine is built on a foundation of scientific breakthrough, with constant change; a physician practicing for even a few years can appreciate this change. Incorporating the knowledge gained from research into clinical practice, however, is inherently difficult. Historically, it can take many years for medicine to adopt change [1]. This fact is not surprising, as research must be replicated and validated. Yet even validated clinical guidelines can take many years to be widely adopted. The number of clinical trials, clinical summaries, and clinical guidelines produced each year continues to increase [2], and physicians in any specialty can feel overwhelmed with the volume of information. Family physicians who care for the undifferentiated patient can feel that the task of analyzing information in the primary care literature and also multiple specialty areas is insurmountable.

Keywords

Obesity Influenza Caffeinated Triglyceride 

References

  1. 1.
    Morris S, Wooding S, Grant J. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. J R Soc Med. 2011;104:510–20.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bastian H, Glasziou P, Chalmers I. Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up? PLoS One. 2010;7(9), e1000326.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sackett DL, et al. Evidence based practice: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ. 1996;312(7023):71–2.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shuval K, et al. Association between primary care physicians’ evidence-based medicine knowledge and quality of care. Int J Qual Health Care. 2010;22(1):16–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guyatt G, et al., editors. Users’ guide to the medical literature: a manual for evidence-based clinical practice. Columbus: McGraw-Hill Education; 2008.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shaughnessy AF. Evaluating and understanding articles about treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2009;79(8):668–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ebell MH, Barry HC, Slawson DC, Shaughnessy AF. Finding POEMs in the medical literature. J Fam Pract. 1999;48(5):350–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Risk and Prevention Study Collaborative Group, Roncaglioni MC, Tombesi M, Avanzini F, Barlera S, Caimi V, Longoni P, Marzona I, Milani V, Silletta MG, et al. n-3 Fatty acids in patients with multiple cardiovascular risk factors. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1800–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Humphrey LL, Deffebach M, Pappas M, Baumann C, Artis K, Priest Mitchell JP, et al. Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: a systematic review to update the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159:411–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Giamcomini M, Cook D. User’s guides to the medical literature XXIII. JAMA. 2000;284:478–82.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Slawson DC, Shaughnessy AF, Bennett JH. Becoming a medical information master: feeling good about not knowing everything. J Fam Pract. 1994;38:505–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Online Clinical Texts include Up to Date: www.uptodate.com, Essential Evidence Plus: www.essentialevidenceplus.com, First Consult: www.clinicalkey.com, and American College of Physicians Smart Medicine: www.acponline.org/clinical_information/smart_medicine
  13. 13.
    Institute of Medicine. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ebell MH, Siwek J, Weiss BD, Woolf SH, Susman J, Ewigman B, Bowman M. Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in the medical literature. Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in the medical literature. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2004;17(1):59–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ebell MH, Siwek J, Weiss BD, Woolf SH, Susman J, Ewigman B, et al. Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in the medical literature. Am Fam Physician. 2004;69(3):548–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Walker E, Hernandez AV, Kattan MW. Meta-analysis: its strengths and limitations. Cleve Clin J Med. 2008;75(6):431–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Slawson DC, Reed SW. Finding high-quality review articles. Am J Fam Pract. 2009;79(10):875–7.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Charles C, Gafna A, Whealan T. Shared decision making in the medical encounter. Soc Sci Med. 1997;44(5):681–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brom L, et al. Medical informatics and decision making. BMC. 2014;14:25.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sheridan S, Harris R, Woolf S. Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention: a suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26(1):56–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shay LA, Lafata JE. Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes. Med Decis Mak. 2014;pii:0272989X14551638. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Elwyn G, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(10):1361–7.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Black WC, Welch HG. The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:966–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Joseph-Williams N, Newcombe R, Politi M, Durand MA, Sivell S, Stacey D, O’Connor A, Volk RJ, Edwards A, Bennett C, Pignone M, Thomson R, Elwyn G. Toward minimum standards for certifying patient decision aids: a modified Delphi consensus process. Med Decis Making. 2013;34(6):699–710.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stacey D, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;1, CD0014312014.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Family and Preventive MedicineUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations