Encyclopedia of Database Systems

Living Edition
| Editors: Ling Liu, M. Tamer Özsu

Graph Mining

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7993-3_80737-1

Synonyms

Definition

Graph mining is defined in general as mining non-trivial graph structures from a single graph or a collection of graphs. Frequent subgraph mining is a typical example of graph mining problems, and is defined as follows. Given a graph data set D = { G1, G2, , Gn} where Gi = (Vi, Ei) (1 ≤ i ≤ n) is a graph with a vertex set Vi and an edge set Ei, find all subgraphs whose support is no less than a user-specified minimum support threshold, where the support of a subgraph g is the number of graphs in D that g is subgraph isomorphic to.

Historical Background

Frequent subgraph mining was first studied by Inokuchi et al. [7], Kuramochi and Karypis [9], Yan and Han [15], and so on, with applications in chemical compound and protein structure analysis. After that, there has been extensive research in the literature that studies mining various forms of graph patterns, such as closed subgraph [16], maximal subgraph [6, 11], significant...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    Aggarwal CC, Wang H, editors. Managing and mining graph data, 1st ed. New York: Springer; 2010.MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chakrabarti D, Faloutsos C, editors. Graph mining: laws, tools, and case studies, 1st ed. San Rafael: Morgan & Claypool Publishers; 2012.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cheng J, Ke Y, Chu S, Ozsu MT. Efficient core decomposition in massive networks. In: ICDE, Hannover; 2011. p. 51–62.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cheng J, Ke Y, Fu A, Yu JX, Zhu L. Finding maximal cliques in massive networks by h*-graph. In: SIGMOD, Indianapolis; 2010. p. 447–58.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cook DJ, Holder LB, editors. Mining graph data, 1st ed. Wiley-Interscience; 2006.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Huan J, Wang W, Prins J, Yang J. SPIN: mining maximal frequent subgraphs from graph databases. In: KDD, Seattle; 2004. p. 581–86.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Inokuchi A, Washio T, Motoda H. An apriori-based algorithm for mining frequent substructures from graph data. In: PKDD, Nantes; 1998. p. 13–23.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jin N, Wang W. LTS: discriminative subgraph mining by learning from search history. In: ICDE, Hannover; 2011. p. 207–18.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuramochi M, Karypis G. Frequent subgraph discovery. In: ICDM, San Jose; 2001. p. 313–20.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kuramochi M, Karypis G. Finding frequent patterns in a large sparse graph. Data Min Knowl Discov. 2005;11:243–271.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thomas L, Valluri S, Karlapalem K. MARGIN: maximal frequent subgraph mining. In: ICDM, Hong Kong; 2006. p. 1097–1101.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tsourakakis CE, Bonchi F, Gionis A, Gullo F, Tsiarli MA. Denser than the densest subgraph: extracting optimal quasi-cliques with quality guarantees. In: KDD, Chicago; 2013. p. 104–12.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang J, Cheng J. Truss decomposition in massive networks. PVLDB. 2012;5(9):812–823.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yan X, Cheng H, Han J, Yu PS. Mining significant graph patterns by scalable leap search. In: SIGMOD, Vancouver; 2008. p. 433–44.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yan X, Han J. gSpan: graph-based substructure pattern mining. In: ICDM, Maebashi City; 2002. p. 721–24.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yan X, Han J. CloseGraph: mining closed frequent graph patterns. In: KDD, Washington, DC; 2003. p. 286–95.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yan X, Yu PS, Han J. Graph indexing: a frequent structure-based approach. In: SIGMOD, Paris; 2004. p. 335–46.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yu PS, Han J, Faloutsos C, editors. Link mining: models, algorithms, and applications, 1st ed. New York: Springer; 2010.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang Y, Parthasarathy S. Extracting analyzing and visualizing triangle k-core motifs within networks. In: ICDE, Washington, DC, 2012. p. 1049–60.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhao P, Yu JX, Yu PS. Graph indexing: tree + delta > = graph. In: VLDB, Vienna; 2007. p. 938–49.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Systems Engineering and Engineering ManagementThe Chinese University of Hong KongHong KongChina
  2. 2.The Chinese University of Hong KongHong KongChina