Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining

2017 Edition
| Editors: Claude Sammut, Geoffrey I. Webb

Privacy-Related Aspects and Techniques

  • Stan Matwin
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7687-1_668

Synonyms

Definition

The privacy-preserving aspects and techniques of machine learning cover the family of methods and architectures developed to protect the privacy of people whose data are used by machine learning (ML) algorithms. This field, also known as privacy-preserving data mining (PPDM), addresses the issues of data privacy in ML and data mining. Most existing methods and approaches are intended to hide the original data from the learning algorithm, while there is emerging interest in methods ensuring that the learned model does not reveal private information. Another research direction contemplates methods in which several parties bring their data into the model-building process without mutually revealing their own data.

Motivation and Background

The key concept for any discussion of the privacy aspects of data mining is the definition of privacy. After Alan Westin, we understand privacy as the ability “of individuals to determine for...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Recommended Reading

  1. Agrawal D, Aggarwal CC (2001) On the design and quantification of privacy preserving data mining algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on principles of database systems. ACM, Santa BarbaraGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal R, Srikant R (2000) Privacy-preserving data mining. ACM SIGMOD Rec. 29(Part 2):439–450Google Scholar
  3. Atzori M, Bonchi F, Giannotti F, Pedreschi D (2005) k-Anonymous patterns. In: Proceedings of the ninth European conference on principles and practice of knowledge discovery in databases (PKDD 05), PortoGoogle Scholar
  4. Barth A, Datta A, Mitchell JC, Nissenbaum H (2006) Privacy and contextual integrity: framework and applications. IEEE Symp Secur Priv 184–198Google Scholar
  5. Clifton CW (2005) What is privacy? Critical steps for privacy-preserving data mining, workshop on privacy and security aspects of data miningGoogle Scholar
  6. Directive (1995) Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. Off J Eur Commun 38(L281):0031–0050Google Scholar
  7. Domingo-Ferrer J, Sebé F, Solanas A (2008) An anonymity model achievable via microaggregation. In: VLDB workshop on secure data management, Auckland. Springer, pp 209–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Du W, Zhan Z (2003) Using randomized response techniques for privacy-preserving data mining. In: Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, Washington, DC, vol 510Google Scholar
  9. Evfimievski A, Srikant R, Agrawal R, Gehrke J (2002) Privacy preserving mining of association rules. In: Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, Edmonton, pp 217–228Google Scholar
  10. Felty A, Matwin S (2002) Privacy-oriented data mining by proof checking. In: Sixth European conference on principles of data mining and knowledge discovery, Helsink, vol 2431, pp 138–149zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Friedman A, Schuster A, Wolff R (2006) k-anonymous decision tree induction. In: PKDD 2006, Berlin, pp 151–162Google Scholar
  12. Health UDo, Services H (eds) (2003) Summary of HIPAA privacy rule. US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  13. Gianotti F, Pedreschi D (2008) Mobility, data mining and privacy: geographic knowledge discovery. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Iyengar VS (2002) Transforming data to satisfy privacy constraints. In: Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, Edmonton, pp 279–288Google Scholar
  15. Jiang W, Atzori M (2006) Secure distributed k-Anonymous pattern mining. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on data mining, Hong Kong. IEEE Computer SocietyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kantarcioglu M, Clifton C (2004) Privacy-preserving distributed mining of association rules on horizontally partitioned data. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 16:1026–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kargupta H, Datta S, Wang Q (2003) On the privacy preserving properties of random data perturbation techniques. In: Third IEEE international conference on data mining (ICDM 2003), Melbourne, pp 99–106Google Scholar
  18. Machanavajjhala A, Kifer D, Gehrke J, Venkitasubramaniam M (2007) L-diversity: privacy beyond k-anonymity. ACM Trans Knowl Discov Data 1:3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Malin BA (2005) An evaluation of the current state of genomic data privacy protection technology and a roadmap for the future. J Am Med Inf Assoc 12:28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moor J (2004) Towards a theory of privacy in the information age. In: Bynum T, Rodgerson S (eds) Computer ethics and professional responsibility. Blackwell, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  21. Ninghui L, Tiancheng L, Venkatasubramanian S (2007) t-closeness: privacy beyond k-anonymity and l-diversity. In: IEEE 23rd international conference on data engineering (ICDE 2007), Istanbul, pp 106–115Google Scholar
  22. Oliveira SRM, Zaïane OR, Saygin Y (2004) Secure association rule sharing. In: Proceedings of the eighth PAKDD and advances in knowledge discovery and data mining, Sydney, pp 74–850Google Scholar
  23. Paillier P (1999) The 26th international conference on privacy and personal data protection, advances in cryptography (EUROCRYPT’99), Prague, pp 23–38Google Scholar
  24. Rossi G (2004) Privacy as quality in modern economy. In: The 26th international conference on privacy and personal data protection, WroclawGoogle Scholar
  25. Subramaniam H, Wright RN, Yang Z (2004) Experimental analysis of privacy-preserving statistics computation. In: Proceedings of the VLDB workshop on secure data management, Toronto, pp 55–66Google Scholar
  26. Sweeney L (2001) Computational disclosure control: a primer on data privacy protection. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Deptartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Vaidya J, Clifton C (2002) Privacy preserving association rule mining in vertically partitioned data. In: Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, Edmonton, pp 639–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vaidya J, Clifton C, Kantarcioglu M, Patterson AS (2008) Privacy-preserving decision trees over vertically partitioned data. ACM Trans Knowl Discov Data 2:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vaidya J, Zhu YM, Clifton CW (2006) Privacy preserving data mining. Springer, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Website of the GeoPKDD Project (2006)Google Scholar
  31. Westin A (1967) Privacy and freedom. Atheneum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Yao A (1986) How to generate and exchange secrets. In: 27th FOCS, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhan J, Matwin S, Chang L (2007) Privacy-preserving collaborative association rule mining. J Netw Comput Appl 30:1216–1227zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhan JZ, Matwin S (2004) Privacy-prteserving data mining in electronic surveys. In: ICEB 2004, Beijing, pp 1179–1185Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stan Matwin
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of OttawaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Polish Academy of SciencesWarsawPoland