Skip to main content

Induction

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining
  • 133 Accesses

Definition

Induction is the process of inferring a general rule from a collection of observed instances. Sometimes it is used more generally to refer to any inference from premises to conclusion where the truth of the conclusion does not follow deductively from the premises, but where the premises provide evidence for the conclusion. In this more general sense, induction includes abduction where facts rather than rules are inferred. (The word “induction” also denotes a different, entirely deductive form of argument used in mathematics.)

Theory

Hume’s Problem of Induction

The problem of induction was famously set out by the great Scottish empiricist philosopher David Hume (1711–1776), although he did not actually use the word “induction” in this context. With characteristic bluntness, he argued that:

there can be no demonstrative arguments to prove that those instances of which we have had no experience resemble those of which we have had experience (Hume 1739, Part 3, Section 6).

...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Recommended Reading

  • Bacchus F, Grove A, Halpern JY, Koller D (1996) From statistical knowledge bases to degrees of belief. Artif Intell 87(1–2):75–143

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Carnap R (1950) Logical foundations of probability. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cussens J (1996) Deduction, induction and probabilistic support. Synthese 108(1):1–10

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Howson C, Urbach P (1989) Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach. Open Court, La Salle

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume D (1739) A treatise of human nature, book one (Anonymously published)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume D (1740) An abstract of a treatise of human nature. (Anonymously published as a pamphlet). Printed for C. Borbet, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos I (1970) Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In: Lakatos I, Musgrave A (eds) Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 91–196

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Popper KR (1959) The logic of scientific discovery. Hutchinson, London (Translation of Logik der Forschung, 1934)

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper KR, Miller D (1984) The impossibility of inductive probability. Nature 310:434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper KR, Miller D (1987) Why probabilistic support is not inductive. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 321: 569–591

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert DH (1992) On the connection between in-sample testing and generalization error. Complex Syst 6: 47–94

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Cussens, J. (2017). Induction. In: Sammut, C., Webb, G.I. (eds) Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7687-1_388

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics