Skip to main content

Implementation Science and Comparative Effectiveness Research

Part of the Health Services Research book series (HEALTHSR)

Abstract

The resurgence of interest in comparative effectiveness research (CER) in the last decade has trained a bright spotlight on ensuring that clinical findings obtained from CER are implemented and disseminated to routine practice so that all patients and populations benefit. The focus on implementation science as part of CER reflects the collective realization that findings from clinical studies have not uniformly resulted in changes in the practices of health care providers or patients, nor have they always yielded improvements in health outcomes. Implementation science, as defined by the journal that bears its name is, “the scientific study of methods to promote the systematic uptake of proven clinical treatments, practices, organizational and management interventions into routine practice, and hence to improve health” “Implementation Science About Implementation Science.” The field has evolved as a multidisciplinary science, drawing principles from the behavioral and social sciences, process engineering, economics, and traditional health services research. Parallel to this evolution, new methodologies and evaluation approaches have emerged to track the processes, organizational contexts, and other elements which contribute to the successful implementation of CER findings. Embedding implementation research into CER starts with strong multidisciplinary teams – from institutional leadership to frontline care providers – to bridge the gap between research and operations; and then depends on organizational receptivity, appropriate infrastructure, and project-specific researcher-clinician partnerships. Governmental agencies around the world are already using forms of implementation science to inform health care; in the United States, the 2010 passage of health care reform legislation offers an unprecedented opportunity to make implementation science part and parcel of clinical practice.

This chapter brings together a brief history of implementation science and CER with a discussion of the current political and economic context, an overview of the major funders in this space, and the myriad evaluation frameworks and other conceptual models for the successful uptake of evidence into practice. Readers will also find a treatment of the ethics associated with research in this field, and a consideration of the state of the research workforce, followed by recommendations for the future.

Keywords

  • Knowledge Translation
  • Implementation Research
  • Comparative Effectiveness Research
  • Implementation Science
  • Comparative Effectiveness Research Study

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  • Aarons GA, Hurlburt M, Horwitz SM. Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2010;38(1):4–23.

    CrossRef  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bonham AC, Solomon MZ. Moving comparative effectiveness research into practice: implementation science and the role of academic medicine. Health Aff. 2010;29(10):1901–5.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell DF, Chatman J, O’Reilly 3rd CA, Ormiston M, Lapiz M. Implementing strategic change in a health care system: the importance of leadership and change readiness. Health Care Manage Rev. 2008;33(2):124–33.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers D. Foreword. In: Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK, editors. Dissemination and implementation research in health. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. vii.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIHR. About knowledge translation. Last modified 2014. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/29418.html. Accessed 26 July 2013.

  • CIHR. Knowledge to action: a knowledge translation casebook. 2008. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/38764.html. Accessed 26 July 2013.

  • CMS. Center for medicare and medicaid innovation – health care innovation awards. http://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/Health Care-Innovation-Awards/. Accessed 26 July 2013.

  • CMS. National healthcare expenditures fact sheet. Last modified in 2014. http://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/NHE-Fact-Sheet.html. Accessed 26 July 2013.

  • Colditz GA, Wolin KY, Gehlert S. Applying what we know to accelerate cancer prevention. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4(127):127rv4.

    CrossRef  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Damschroder L, Aron D, Keith R, Kirsh S, Alexander J, Lowery J. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50.

    CrossRef  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon-Woods M, Bosk C, Aveling E, Goeschel C, Pronovost P. Explaining Michigan: Developing an Ex Post Theory of a Quality Improvement Program. Milbank Q. 2011;89(2):167–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emanuel E, Wendler D, Grady C. What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA. 2000;283:2701–11.

    CAS  CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faden R, Beauchamp TL, Kass NE. Learning health care systems and justice. Hastings Center Report, 2011; July–August: 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein AC, Glasgow RE. A practical, robust implementation and sustainability model (PRISM) for integrating research findings into practice. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008;34(4):228–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon MP, Sanchez E, Pons JM. From recommendation to action: psychosocial factors influencing physician intention to use Health Technology Assessment (HTA) recommendations. Implement Sci. 2006;1:8.

    CrossRef  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322–7.

    CAS  CrossRef  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581–629.

    CrossRef  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Implementation Science About Implementation Science. Implementation science “About this Journal”. http://www.implementationscience.com/about. Accessed 26 July 2013.

  • Institute of Medicine (IOM). Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalfoglou AL, Boenning DA, Korn D, Institute of Medicine. Exploring the map of clinical research for the coming decade: symposium summary, Clinical Research Roundtable, December 2000. Washington, DC: Board on Health Sciences Policy, Institute of Medicine; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kass N, Faden R, Tunis S. Addressing low-risk comparative effectiveness research in proposed changes to U.S. federal regulations governing research. JAMA. 2012;307(15):1589–90.

    CAS  CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kitson A, Rycroft-Malone J, Harvey G, McCormack B, Seers K, Titchen A. Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges. Implement Sci. 2008;3:1. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitson A, Strauss SE. The knowledge-to-action cycle: identifying the gaps. Can Med Assoc J. 2010;182(2):E73–7.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, Institute of Medicine. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroenke K, Kapoor W, Helfand M, Meltzer DO, McDonald MA, Selker H. Training and career development for comparative effectiveness research workforce development: CTSA Consortium Strategic Goal Committee on comparative effectiveness research workgroup on workforce development. Clin Transl Sci. 2010;3(5):258–62.

    CrossRef  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Largent E, Joffe S, Miller F. Can research and caer be ethically integrated? Hastings Center Rep. 2011;41(4):37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee DH, Vielemeyer O. Analysis of overall level of evidence behind Infectious Diseases Society of America practice guidelines. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(1):18–22.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lenfant C. Shattuck lecture–clinical research to clinical practice–lost in translation? N Engl J Med. 2003;349(9):868–74.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2635–45.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meissner HI, Glasgow RE, Vinson CA, Chambers D, Brownson RC, Green LW, Ammerman AS, Weiner BJ, Mittman B. The U.S. training institute for dissemination and implementation research in health. Implement Sci. 2013;8:12. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-12.

    CrossRef  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mittman BS. Implementation science in health care. In: Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK, editors. Dissemination and implementation research in health. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 400–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. The CTSA program at NIH: opportunities for advancing clinical and translational research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • NHLBI. Facts about ALLHAT: new findings about drugs to lower high blood pressure and cholesterol. http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/allhat/facts.htm. Accessed 24 July 2013.

  • NICE. How to put NICE guidance into practice. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2005, Interim.

    Google Scholar 

  • NIH. Center for scientific review. Dissemination and implementation research in health study section. http://public.csr.nih.gov/StudySections/IntegratedReviewGroups/HDMIRG/DIRH/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed 24 July 2013.

  • NIH. Dissemination and implementation science. The National Library of Medicine. Last modified 2015. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/hsrinfo/implementation_science.html. Accessed 26 July 2013.

  • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 111–148. 2010 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1185–9511.

    Google Scholar 

  • PCORI. National priorities for research and research Agenda. Washington, DC: Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute; 2012. http://www.pcori.org/assets/PCORI-National-Priorities-and-Research-Agenda-2012-05-21-FINAL1.pdf. Accessed 24 July 2013.

  • Proctor EK, Knudsen KJ, Fedoravicius N, Hovmand P, Rosen A, Perron B. Implementation of evidence-based practice in community behavioral health: agency director perspectives. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2007;34(5):479–88.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(26):2725–32.

    CAS  CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riley WT, Glasgow RE, Etheredge L, Abernethy AP. Rapid, responsive, relevant (R3) research: a call for a rapid learning health research enterprise. Clin Transl Med. 2013;2(1):10.

    CrossRef  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rycroft-Malone J, Kitson A, Harvey G, et al. Ingredients for change: revisiting a conceptual framework. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11(2):174–80.

    CAS  CrossRef  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schillinger D. An introduction to effectiveness, dissemination and implementation research. In: Fleisher P, Goldstein E, editors. From the series: UCSF Clinical and Translational Science Institute (CTSI) resource manuals and guides to community-engaged research. Published by Clinical Translational Science Institute Community Engagement Program, University of California San Francisco. 2010. http://ctsi.ucsf.edu/files/CE/edi_introguide.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2013.

  • Scott IA, Glasziou PP. Improving the effectiveness of clinical medicine: the need for better science. Med J Aust. 2012;196(5):304–8.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Selker H, Grossman C, Adams A, Goldmann D, Dezii C, Meyer G, Roger V, Savitz L, Platt R. The common rule and continuous improvement in health care: a learning health system perspective. Unpublished discussion paper posted on Institute of Medicine website. 2011. http://www.iom.edu/Global/Perspectives/2012/CommonRule.aspx. Accessed 31 July 2013.

  • Selker H, Leslie L, Wasser J, Plaut A, Wilson I, Griffith J. Tufts CTSI: Comparative Effectiveness Research as a Conceptual Framework for a Focus on Impact. Clin Transl Sci. 2011;3(2):56–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrank W. The center for medicare and medicaid innovation’s blueprint for rapid-cycle evaluation of new care and payment models. Health Aff. 2013;32(4):807–12.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stafford RS, Bartholomew LK, Cushman WC, Cutler JA, Davis BR, Dawson G, Einhorn PT, Furberg CD, Piller LB, Pressel SL, Whelton PK, ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Impact of the ALLHAT/JNC7 Dissemination Project on thiazide-type diuretic use. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(10):851–8.

    CrossRef  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stetler C, Damschroder L, Helfrich C, Hagedorn H. A Guide for applying a revised version of the PARIHS framework for implementation. Implement Sci. 2011;6:99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone EG, Morton SC, Hulscher ME, et al. Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(9):641–51.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sung NS, Crowley Jr WF, Genel M, et al. Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. JAMA. 2003;289(10):1278–87.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tricoci P, Allen JM, Kramer JM, Califf RM, Smith Jr SC. Scientific evidence underlying the ACC/AHA clinical practice guidelines. JAMA. 2009;301(8):831–41.

    CAS  CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • VHA. QUERI implementation guide, vol 2012. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington AE, Lipstein SH. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute–promoting better information, decisions, and health. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(15):e31.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss AP. Measuring the impact of medical research: moving from outputs to outcomes. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164(2):206–14.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woolf SH. The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA. 2008;299:211–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woolf SH, Johnson RE. The break-even point: when medical advances are less important than improving the fidelity with which they are delivered. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3(6):545–52.

    CrossRef  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zerhouni EA. Translational and clinical science–time for a new vision. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(15):1621–3.

    CAS  CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ann C. Bonham .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Bonham, A.C., Solomon, M.Z., Mittman, B., Ommaya, A.K., Berlin, A. (2015). Implementation Science and Comparative Effectiveness Research. In: Levy, A., Sobolev, B. (eds) Comparative Effectiveness Research in Health Services. Health Services Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7586-7_11-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7586-7_11-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7586-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine