Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

Living Edition
| Editors: Alain Marciano, Giovanni Battista Ramello

Merit Goods

  • Valérie Clément
  • Nathalie Moureau
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_663-1

Merit goods are a category of goods, introduced in the debate by Musgrave (1957), which individuals tend to under- or over-consume because their preferences are “irrational” or “defective.” This leads individuals to make suboptimal choices, which are detrimental to their well-being. Now, if they exist, merit goods must be produced by the government that must so to speak force individuals to consume the correct amount of these goods. In other words, the government must behave paternalistically.

The concept of merit goods was a precursor to the debates on paternalism within welfare economics. In particular, the interpretation of the merit goods concept through the meta-preferences approach helps in legitimizing legal intervention and achieving a more efficient regulation.

When Musgrave introduced the term “merit goods” (originally called merit wants), it was in an attempt to create a normative definition for government functions. Nevertheless, only three of the functions he studied in...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Brennan G, Lomasky L (1983) Institutional aspects of ‘merit goods’ analysis. Finanzarchiv 41(2):183–206Google Scholar
  2. Buchanan JM, Tullock G (1962) The calculus of consent: logical foundations of constitutional democracy. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Calabresi G (2016) The future of law and economics. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  4. Elster J (1979) Ulysses and the sirens: studies in rationality and irrationality. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Etzioni A (1986) The case for a multiple utility conception. Econ Philos 2(2):159–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fiorito R, Kollintzas T (2004) Public goods merit goods and the relation between private and government consumption. Eur Econ Rev 48:1367–1398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frankfurt HG (1971) Freedom of the will and the concept of a person. J Philos 68(1):5–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. George D (1998) Coping rationally with unpreferred preferences. East Econ J 24(2):181–194Google Scholar
  9. Harsanyi J (1955) Cardinal welfare individualistic ethics and interpersonal comparisons of utility. J Polit Econ 63(4):309–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Head JG (1966) On merit goods. Finanzarchiv 25(1):1–29Google Scholar
  11. Head JG (1969) Merit goods revisited. Finanzarchiv 28(2):214–225Google Scholar
  12. Hirschman AO (1984) Against parsimony: three easy ways of complicating some categories of economic discourse. Am Econ Rev 74(2):89–96Google Scholar
  13. Jeffrey R (1974) Preferences among preferences. J Philos 71(13):377–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jones P, Cullis J (2002) Merit want status and motivation: the knight meets the selfloving butcher brewer and baker. Public Financ Rev 30(2):83–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kirchgässner G (2017) Soft paternalism merit goods and normative individualism. Eur J Law Econ 43(1):125–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McLure CE (1968) Merit wants: a normative empty box. Finanzarchiv 27(2):474–483Google Scholar
  17. Musgrave RA (1957) A multiple theory of budget determination. Finanzarchiv 17(3):333–343Google Scholar
  18. Musgrave RA (1959) The theory of public finance: a study in public economic. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Musgrave RA (1969) Provision for social goods. In: Margolis J, Guitton H (eds) Public economics. McMillan, London, pp 124–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Musgrave RA (1987) Merit goods. In: Eatwell J, Milgate M, Neuman P (eds) The New Palgrave: a dictionary of economics. Macmillan, London, pp 452–453Google Scholar
  21. Pazner EA (1972) Merit wants and the theory of taxation. Public Financ 27(4):460–472Google Scholar
  22. Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  23. Roskamp KW (1975) Public goods merit goods private goods Pareto optimum and social optimum. Public Financ 30(1):61–69Google Scholar
  24. Salanié F, Treich N (2009) Regulation in Happyville. Econ J 119(537):665–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schelling TC (1984) Self-command in practice in policy and in a theory of rational choice. Am Econ Rev 74(2):1–11Google Scholar
  26. Sen AK (1977) Rational fools: a critique of the behavioural foundations of economic theory. Philos Public Aff 6(4):317–344Google Scholar
  27. Sunstein CR, Thaler RH (2003) Libertarian paternalism is not an oxymoron. University Chicago Law Rev 70(4):1159–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2008) Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press, New HeavenGoogle Scholar
  29. Ver Eecke W (2001) The concept of a merit good: the ethical dimension in economic theory and the history of economic thought or the transformation of economics into socio economics. J Socio-Econ 27(1):133–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wenzel HD, Wiegard W (1981) Merit goods and second-best taxation. Public Financ 36(1):125–139Google Scholar
  31. West EG, MacKee M (1983) De gustibus Est disputandum the phenomenon of merit wants revisited. Am Econ Rev 7(5):1110–1121Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MRE, EA 7491Université de MontpellierMontpellierFrance
  2. 2.ARTdev, UMR 5281Université Paul ValéryMontpellierFrance