Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

Living Edition
| Editors: Alain Marciano, Giovanni Battista Ramello

Consensus

  • Pavel KucharEmail author
Living reference work entry

Later version available View entry history

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_30-1

Definition

Consensus is a conventional source of justified beliefs. In modern democratic societies, rational consensus, formed by means of free and open discussion, is a criterion of political legitimacy.

Introduction

Modern democracy as a form of government is a unique phenomenon, existing for only a short period of time in the history of our civilization. In this contribution, the role of consensus in directing the course of modern democracies is addressed. Public choice scholars have extensively studied the problem of amalgamating individual beliefs into aggregate social estimates for the purposes of legitimizing political authority. The aggregation of individual beliefs, however, is a specific example of a general question about the creation and use of knowledge. How does the process of consensus formation affect the accuracy and reliability of our knowledge? Without understanding how the division of labor brings together scientific communities and without understanding how these...

Keywords

Expert Consensus Justify Belief Scientific Consensus Prediction Market Public Deliberation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Berggren N, Jordahl H, Stern C (2009) The political opinions of Swedish social scientists. Finnish Econ Pap 22(2):75–88Google Scholar
  2. Blaug M (1992) The methodology of economics, or, how economists explain. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bohman J (1999) Democracy as inquiry, inquiry as democratic: pragmatism, social science, and the cognitive division of labor. Am J Polit Sci 43(2):590–607. doi:10.2307/2991808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brittan S (1973) Is there an economic consensus?: an attitude survey. Macmillan, London, Retrieved from http://www.getcited.org/pub/101449120
  5. Brock WA, Durlauf SN (1999) A formal model of theory choice in science. Econ Theor 14(1):113–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caplan B. (2007) The Myth of the rational voter: why democracies choose bad policies. Princeton: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  7. David PA (1998) Communication norms and the collective cognitive performance of “invisible colleges.” In: Creation and transfer of knowledge. Springer, pp 115–163. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-662-03738-6_7
  8. Frey BS (2003) Publishing as prostitution? – choosing between one’s own ideas and academic success. Public Choice 116(1–2):205–223. doi:10.1023/A:1024208701874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frey BS, Pommerehne WW, Schneider F, Gilbert G (1984) Consensus and dissension among economists: an empirical inquiry. Am Econ Rev 74(5):986–994. doi:10.2307/557Google Scholar
  10. Gauchat G (2012) Politicization of science in the public sphere a study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. Am Sociol Rev 77(2):167–187. doi:10.1177/0003122412438225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gordon R, Dahl GB (2013) Views among economists: professional consensus or point-counterpoint? Am Econ Rev 103(3):629–635. doi:10.1257/aer.103.3.629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hanson R (2013) Shall we vote on values, but bet on beliefs? J Polit Philos 21(2):151–178. doi:10.1111/jopp.12008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kahan DM, Jenkins-Smith H, Braman D (2011) Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. J Risk Res 14(2):147–174. doi:10.1080/13669877.2010.511246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kitcher P (1990) The division of cognitive labor. J Philos 87(1):5–22. doi:10.2307/2026796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kitcher P (2002) Contrasting conceptions of social epistemology. In: Brad Wray K (ed) Knowledge and inquiry: readings in epistemology. Broadview Press, PeterboroughGoogle Scholar
  16. Klein DB, Davis WL, Hedengren D (2013) Economics professors’ voting, policy views, favorite economists, and frequent lack of consensus. Econ J Watch 10(1):116–125Google Scholar
  17. May A, McGarvey MG, Whaples R (2013) Are disagreements among male and female economists marginal at best?: a survey of AEA members and their views on economic policy. Contemp Econ Policy. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/coep.12004/full
  18. Mayer T (1993) Truth versus precision in economics. E. Elgar, Aldershot/BrookfieldGoogle Scholar
  19. Mill JS (1859) On liberty. In: Essays on politics and society, vol XVIII. University of Toronto Press, Toronto. Retrieved from http://oll.libertyfund.org/index.php?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php&title=233&search=%22collision+of+adverse+opinions%22&chapter=16554&layout=html#a_799799
  20. Polanyi M (1962) The republic of science: its political and economic theory. Minerva 38(1):1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Polanyi M (1974) Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Chicago: University Of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  22. Šťastný D (2010) The economics of economics: Why economists aren’t as important as garbagemen (but they might be). Turin: Instituto Bruno Leoni, Prague: CEVRO Institute and Wolters KluwerGoogle Scholar
  23. Sunstein CR (2002) Conformity and dissent. Law School, the University of Chicago. Retrieved from http://www.law.uchicago.edu/files/files/34.crs_.conformity.pdf
  24. Vanberg VJ (2010) The “science-as-market” analogy: a constitutional economics perspective. Const Polit Econ 21(1):28–49. doi:10.1007/s10602-008-9061-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wolfers J, Zitzewitz E (2004) Prediction markets. J Econ Perspect 18(2):107–126. doi:10.2307/3216893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zamora Bonilla JP (2008) The elementary economics of scientific consensus. Theor Rev Teoría Hist Fundam Cienc 14(3):461–488Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Guanajuato, Department of Economics and FinanceDCEA-Campus Marfil, Fracc. IEl EstabloMexico