Skip to main content

Coase Theorem

Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

Definition

Assuming the property rights are well defined and that the costs of transacting are zero, parties to an externality will resolve the dispute efficiently, and the outcome will be unaffected by to which party rights are initially assigned.

Introduction

The Coase theorem was derived from the negotiation result laid out by Ronald Coase in his 1960 article, “The Problem of Social Cost” (1960), after having first been articulated in his discussion of the allocation of broadcast frequencies a year earlier (Coase 1959). The theorem, so named by George Stigler (1966, p. 113), has been stated in a variety of ways by the thousands of authors who have invoked it over the last five decades, but the essentials are as follows: Assuming the property rights are well defined and that the costs of transacting are zero, parties to an externality will resolve the dispute efficiently, and the outcome will be unaffected by to which party rights are initially assigned. In short, rights matter, but...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen DW (1990) What are transaction costs? Res Law Econ 14:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase RH (1959) The federal communications commission. J Law Econ 2(1):1–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase RH (1960) The problem of social cost. J Law Econ 3:1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz H (1964) The exchange and enforcement of property rights. J Law Econ 7:11–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1990) Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. J Pol Econ 98(6):1325–1348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medema SG, Zerbe RO Jr (2000) The Coase theorem. In: Boudewijn BBA, Geest GD (eds) The encyclopedia of law and economics. Edward Elgar, Aldershot, pp 836–892

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishan EJ (1971) The postwar literature on externalities: an interpretive essay. J Econ Lit 9(1):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler GJ (1966) The theory of price. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Ayres I, Talley E (1995) Solomonic bargaining: dividing a legal entitlement to facilitate coasean trade. Yale Law J 104(5):1027–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan JM (1973) The Coase theorem and the theory of the state. Nat Resour J 13:579–594

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabresi G (1991) The pointlessness of pareto: carrying Coase further. Yale Law J 100:1211–1237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calabresi G, Melamed AD (1972) Property rules, liability rules and inalienability: one view of the cathedral. Harv Law Rev 85(6):1089–1128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase RH (1988) Notes on the problem of social cost. In: The firm, the market, and the law. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 157–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooter R (1982) The cost of Coase. J Leg Stud 11(1):1–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz H (1972) When does the rule of liability matter? J Leg Stud 1(1):13–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellickson RC (1986) Of Coase and cattle: dispute resolution among neighbors in Shasta County. Stanford Law Rev 38(3):623–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farber DA (1997) Parody lost/pragmatism regained: the ironic history of the Coase theorem. Va Law Rev 83:397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halteman J (2005) Externalities and the Coase theorem: a diagrammatic presentation. J Econ Educ 36(4):385–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman E, Spitzer ML (1982) The Coase theorem: some experimental tests. J Law Econ 25(1):73–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medema SG (1994) Ronald H Coase. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Medema SG (1999) Legal fiction: the place of the Coase theorem in law and economics. Econ Philos 15(2):209–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medema SG (2009) The hesitant hand: taming self-interest in the history of economic ideas. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Parisi F (2003) Political Coase theorem. Public Choice 115(1/2):1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner RA, Parisi F (2013) The Coase theorem, vol 2. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels WJ (1974) The Coase theorem and the study of law and economics. Nat Resour J 14:1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher D (1998) The Coase theorem is tautological, incoherent or wrong. Econ Lett 61(1):3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven G. Medema .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Medema, S.G. (2013). Coase Theorem. In: Backhaus, J. (eds) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_29-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_29-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7883-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Coase Theorem
    Published:
    12 January 2021

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_29-2

  2. Forensic Science
    Published:
    20 September 2014

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_11-1

  3. Original

    Coase Theorem
    Published:
    24 June 2014

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_29-1