Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

2019 Edition
| Editors: Alain Marciano, Giovanni Battista Ramello

Energy Governance: EU-Russia Gas Exchanges

  • C. LocatelliEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_690


Strong and lasting interdependencies exist between EU and Russia concerning natural gas exchanges. They imply some questions about energy security from both parties. One could have expected the setting up of more or less institutionalized governance structures – as an institutional system of rules – allowing the management of risks and externalities linked to this interdependence.

On both sides there is a willingness to cooperate. However, to date, the institutional gap between the supply and demand of the cooperation is a constraint to define a governance structure. The question is to know if international standards based on rules generated by the EU are consistent with Russia’s institutional environment. The competitive logic and the regulation on which the EU energy policy is founded conflict with the institutional specificities of the Russian economy. This contradiction explains the failure in the European strategy of external governance with Russia. The “gas conflicts”...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Amable B (2016) Institutional complementarities in the dynamic comparative analysis capitalism. J Inst Econ 12(1):79–103Google Scholar
  2. Andersen S, Sitter N (2016) The external reach of the EU regulatory state: Norway, Russia and the security of natural gas supplies. In: Peters I (ed) The European Union’s foreign policy in comparative perspective beyond the ‘actorness and power’ debate. Routledge, Contemporary European Studies, Oxford, pp 80–97Google Scholar
  3. Aoki M (2001) Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis MIT Press, Cambridge; London, 560 pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boussena S, Locatelli C (2013) Energy institutional and organisational changes in EU and Russia: revisiting gas relations. Energy Policy 55:180–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boussena S, Locatelli C (2016) Guerre des prix ou instrumentalisation de l’incertitude sur les prix: quelle stratégie pour un fournisseur dominant sur le marché gazier européen ? Cahier de recherche EDDEN, 1Google Scholar
  6. Cherp A, Jewell J (2014) The concept of energy security: beyond the four As. Energy Policy 75:415–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Damro C (2012) Market power in Europe. J Eur Publ Policy 19(5):682–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Escribano G (2015) Fragmented energy governance and the provision of global public goods. Global Pol 6(2):97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Godzimirski J (2015) Russia-EU energy relations : from complementarity to distrust? In: Godzimirski J (ed) EU Leadership in energy and environmental governance: global and local challenges and responses. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 89–112Google Scholar
  10. Goldtheau A, Sitter N (2015) Soft power with a hard edge: EU policy tools and energy security. Rev Int Polit Econ 22(5):941–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haghighi S (2007) Energy security: the external legal relations of the European Union with major oil- and gas-supplying countries. Hart, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Hausner J (1995) Imperative vs interactive strategy of systemic change in central and Eastern Europe. Rev Int Polit Econ 2:249–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Keating M (2012) Re-thinking EU Energy Security: The Utility of Global Best practices for Successful Transnational Energy Governance. in Kuzemko C, Belyi A, Goldthau A, Keating M. (eds) Dynamics of Energy Governance in Europe and Russia (Palgrave MacMillan), pp. 86–105Google Scholar
  14. Kratochvil P, Tichy L (2013) EU and Russian discourse on energy relations. Energy Policy 56:391–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kustova I (2016) A treaty à la carte? Some reflections on the modernization of the energy charter process. J World Energy Law Bus 9:357–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lavanex S (2004) EU external governance in ‘wider Europe’. J Eur Publ Policy 11(4):681–700Google Scholar
  17. Lavanex S, Schimmelfenning F (2009) EU rules beyond EU borders: theorizing external governance in European politics. J Eur Public Policy 791–818Google Scholar
  18. Locatelli C (2014) The Russian gas industry: challenges to the ‘Gazprom model’? Post Communist Econ 26(1):53–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Locatelli C, Finon D (2003) Les limites à l'introduction des institutions de marché dans un secteur de rente. Histoire des représentations du marché: Xe colloque, Grenoble, Association Charles Gide pour l'étude de la pensée économique, 25–27 septembreGoogle Scholar
  20. Murell P (ed) (2001) Assessing the value of law in transition economies. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  21. Newmann A, Posner E (2015) Putting the EU in its place: policy strategies and the global regulatory context. J Eur Publ Policy 22(9):1316–1335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Roland G (2000) Transition and economics: politics, markets, and firms. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Romanova T (2014) Russian energy in the EU market: bolstered institutions and their effects. Energy Policy 74:44–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stiglitz J (1999) Whither reform? Ten years of the transition. In Pleskovic B, Stiglitz J (eds) World Bank annual bank conference in development economics, pp 27–56Google Scholar
  25. Walde T (2008) Renegotiating acquired rights in the oil and gas industries: industry and political cycles meet the rule of law. J World Energy Law Bus 1(1):55–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Williamson O (1985) The economic institutions of capitalism: firms, markets, relational contracting. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Yang Z, Zhang R, Zhang Z (2016) An exploration of a strategic competition model for the European Union natural gas market. Energy Econ 57:236–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GAEL, CNRS, Grenoble, INP, INRAUniversity of Grenoble-AlpesGrenobleFrance