Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

2019 Edition
| Editors: Alain Marciano, Giovanni Battista Ramello

Liability and Information

  • Florian BaumannEmail author
  • Tim Friehe
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_687


The allocation of information is of paramount importance for the efficacy of liability law as an instrument to address externalities. This entry discusses several possible repercussions of imperfect information, such as inefficient caretaking resulting from the injurer’s imperfect information about the standard of care under negligence or distorted decisions about buying liability insurance. In addition, the contribution presents results from the literature on the incentives to acquire information about risk induced by liability law. Decision makers usually have the opportunity to improve their state of knowledge at a cost, and liability law will impact on the incentives to actually do so and to possibly share this information. Starting from Shavell (1992), we discuss – inter alia – literature analyzing the incentive for accurate harm assessment and the use of hindsight information in court, the effects of disclosure rules, or adjustments in due-care standards to further the generation of information in a process of learning-by-doing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Bajtelsmit V, Thistle P (2015) Liability, insurance, and the incentive to obtain information about risk. Geneva Risk and Insur Rev 40:171–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumann F, Friehe T (2016) Learning-by-doing in torts: Liability and information about accident technology. Econ Lett 138:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ben-Shahar O (1998) Should product liability be based on hindsight? J Law Econ Org 14:325–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chemarin S, Orset C (2011) Innovation and information acquisition under time inconsistency and uncertainty. Geneva Risk and Insur Rev 36:132–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Craswell R, Calfee J (1986) Deterrence and uncertain legal standards. J Law Econ Org 2:279–303Google Scholar
  6. Crocker KJ, Doherty N (2000) Why people buy liability insurance under the rule of simple negligence. In: Baye MR (ed) Industrial organization (advances in applied microeconomics), vol 9. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 133–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dari-Mattiacci G, Franzoni LA (2014) Innovative negligence rules. American Law Econ Rev 16:333–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dari-Mattiacci G, Garoupa N (2009) Least-cost avoidance: the tragedy of common safety. J Law Econ Org 25:235–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Daughety A, Reinganum J (2013) Economic analysis of products liability: theory. In: Arlen JH (ed) Research handbook on the economics of torts. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar
  10. Endres A (1989) Liability and information. J Inst Theor Econ 145:249–274Google Scholar
  11. Endres A, Bertram R (2006) The development of care technology under liability law. Int Rev Law Econ 26:503–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feess E, Wohlschlegel A (2006) Liability and information transmission: the advantage of negligence based rules. Econ Lett 92:63–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kaplow, L., and S. Shavell, 1996. Accuracy in the Assessment of Damages. Journal of Law and Economics 39, 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Miceli TJ, Segerson K, Wang S (2015) Products liability when consumers vary in their susceptibility to harm and may misperceive risk. Contemp Econ Policy 33:468–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Parchomosky G, Stein A (2008) Torts and innovation. Mich Law Rev 107:285–315Google Scholar
  16. Polinsky AM, Shavell S (2012) Mandatory versus voluntary disclosure of product risks. J Law Econ Org 28:360–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shavell S (1987) Economics analysis of accident law. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shavell S (1992) Liability and the incentive to obtain information about risk. J Leg Stud 21:259–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shavell S (2000) On the social function and the regulation of liability insurance. Geneva Pap Risk Insur 25:166–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Skogh G (1998) Development risks, strict liability, and the insurability of industrial hazards. Geneva Pap Risk Insur 23:247–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wagner WE (2004) Commons ignorance: the failure of environmental law to produce needed information on health and the environment. Duke Law J 53:1619–1745Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Advanced Studies in Law and Economics (CASTLE)University of BonnBonnGermany
  2. 2.Public Economics GroupPhilipps-University MarburgMarburgGermany