Abstract
Within the economics and law fields, many decisions must be based on what is reported by another person, who can deceive the decision maker by lying. Thus, discovering if our interlocutor is sincere or not is crucial in order to make good decisions. Research highlighted that the spontaneous strategies that we use to identify possible lies are often misleading. Our moods and personality, together with the level of trust between speakers, are all factors that can influence the detection of lies. However, the ability to discover lies may increase with appropriate training and experience of dealing with people in contexts where the probability of being deceived is quite high. Regardless of our actual skill in discovering lies, our attitude toward lying can influence the decision-making process. For example, when we are aware of the possibility that a lie occurs, a suspicious attitude can lead to a wrong judgment. Similarly, perceiving an alleged lie, whether it is real or not, can prompt the use of emotional heuristics linked to the perceived feelings of antipathy, anxiety, or anger. This can lead to decisions aimed at creating disadvantages for the partner. Under these circumstances, it is necessary to take into account the variety of human behavior, not relying on stereotypes to identify a lie. Being used to interact in particular contexts where the risk of being deceived is high may definitely help to sharpen the ability to find out who is lying to us, increasing the likelihood of taking rational choices based on reliable cues.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Antal A, Terney D, Poreisz C, Paulus W (2007) Towards unravelling task-related modulations of neuroplastic changes induced in the human motor cortex. Eur J Neurosci 26:2687–2691
Baldi PL, Iannello P, Riva S, Antonietti A (2013) Socially biased decisions are associated to individual differences in cognitive reflection. Stud Psychol 55:265–271
Bembich S, Clarici A, Vecchiet C, Baldassi G, Cont G, Demarini S (2014) Differences in time course activation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex associated with low or high risk choices in a gambling task. Front Hum Neurosci 24(8):464
Caldwell S (2000) Romantic deception – the six signs he’s lying. Adams Media Corp., Holbrook
Camden C, Motley MX, Wilson A (1984) White lies in interpersonal communication: a taxonomy and preliminary investigation of social motivations. West J Speech Commun 48:309–325
Colombo B, Rodella C, Riva S, Antonietti A (2013) The effects of lies on economic decision making. An eye-tracking study. Res Psychol Behav Sci 1(3):38–47
DePaulo BM (1994) Spotting lies: can humans learn to do better? Psychol Sci 3(3):83–86
DePaulo BM, Kashy DA (1998) Everyday lies in close and casual relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol 74:63–79
DePaulo BM, Pfeifer RL (1986) On-the-job experience and skill at detecting deception. J Appl Soc Psychol 16:249–267
DePaulo BM, Kashy DA, Kirkendol SE, Wyer MM, Epstein JA (1996) Lying in everyday life. J Pers Soc Psychol 70:979–995
Ding WN, Sun JH, Sun YW, Chen X, Zhou Y, Zhuang ZG, Li L, Zhang Y, Xu JR, Du YS (2014) Trait impulsivity and impaired prefrontal impulse inhibition function in adolescents with internet gaming addiction revealed by a Go/No-Go fMRI study. Behav Brain Funct 30:10–20
Ekman P (2009) Telling lies: clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage. WW Norton, New York
Ekman P, Frank MG (1993) Lies that fail. In: Lewis M, Saarni C (eds) Lying and deception in everyday life. Guilford Press, New York, pp 184–200
Ekman P, O’Sullivan M (1991) Who can catch a liar? Am Psychol 46:913–920
Ekman P, O’Sullivan M, Frank MG (1999) A few can catch a liar. Psychol Sci 10(3):263–266
Etcoff NL, Ekman P, Magee JJ, Frank MG (2000) Lie detection and language comprehension. Nature 405(6783):139–139
Grice HP (1989) Studies in the way of words. Harvard University Press, Boston
Hample D (1980) Purposes and effects of lying. South Speech Commun J 46:33–47
Hartwig M, Bond CF Jr (2011) Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments. Psychol Bull 137:643–659
Hsee CK, Rottenstreich Y, Xiao Z (2005) When is more better? On the relationship between magnitude and subjective value. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 24:234–237
Iannello P, Antonietti A (2008) Reciprocity in financial decision making: intuitive and analytical mind-reading strategies. Int Rev Econ 55:167–184
Iannello P, Colombo B, Antonietti A (2014) Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques in the study of intuition. In: Sinclair M (ed) Handbook of research methods on intuition. Edward Elgar, Northampton, pp 130–143
Iannello P, Balconi M, Antonietti A (2014) Analytical versus intuitive decision making modulates trust in e-commerce. Neuropsychol Trends 16:31–49
Jensen LA, Arnett JJ, Feldman SS, Cauffman E (2004) The right to do wrong: lying to parents among adolescents and emerging adults. J Youth Adolesc 33:101–112
Kahneman D (1994) New Challenges to the Rationality Assumption. J Inst Theor Econ, 150(1):18–44
Kraut RE, Poe D (1980) Behavioral roots of person perception; the deception judgments of customs inspectors and laypersons. J Pers Soc Psychol 39:784–796
Kuo HI, Bikson M, Datta A, Minhas P, Paulus W, Kuo MF, Nitsche MA (2013) Comparing cortical plasticity induced by conventional and high-definition 4 × 1 ring tDCS: a neurophysiological study. Brain Stimul 6:644–648
Lang N, Siebner HR, Ernst D, Nitsche MA, Paulus W, Lemon RN, Rothwell JC (2004) Preconditioning with transcranial direct current stimulation sensitizes the motor cortex to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation and controls the direction of after-effects. Biol Psychiatry 56:634–639
Lee I, Byeon JS (2014) Learning-dependent changes in the neuronal correlates of response inhibition in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus. Exp Neurobiol 23:178–189
McCornack SA, Levine TR (1990) When lies are uncovered: Emotional and relational outcomes of discovered deception. Communication Monographs 57:119–138
Nitsche MA, Paulus W (2001) Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology 57:1899–1901
O’Sullivan M (2009) Why most people parse palters, fibs, lies, whoppers, and other deceptions poorly. In: Harrington B (ed) Deception: from ancient empires to internet dating. Stanford University Press, Berkeley, pp 74–91
Powell K (2003) Economy of the mind. PLoS Biol 3:312–315
Riva S, Monti M, Iannello P, Pravettoni G, Schulz PJ, Antonietti A (2014) A preliminary mixed-method investigation of trust and hidden signals in medical consultations. PLosONE 9(3):e90941. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090941
Rosenthal R, DePaulo BM (1979) Sex differences in eavesdropping on nonverbal cues. J Pers Soc Psychol 37:273–285
Schwarz N (2002) Feeling as information: moods influence judgments and processing strategies. In: Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D (eds) Heuristics and biases: the psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 534–547
Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, McGregor DG (2002) The affect heuristic. In: Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D (eds) Heuristics and bias: the psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 397–420
Stanovich KE, West RF (2000) Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate? Behav Brain Sci 23:645–665
Toris C, DePaulo BM (1984) Effects of actual deception and suspiciousness of deception on interpersonal perceptions. J Pers Soc Psychol 47:1063–1073
Turner RE, Edgley C, Olmstead G (1975) Information control in conversations: honesty is not always the best policy. Kans J Sociol 11:69–89
Vrij A, Semin GR (1996) Lie experts’ beliefs about nonverbal indicators of deception. J Nonverbal Behav 20:65–80
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Antonietti, A., Colombo, B., Rodella, C. (2019). Lies and Decision Making. In: Marciano, A., Ramello, G.B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_582
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_582
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7752-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7753-2
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences