Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

2019 Edition
| Editors: Alain Marciano, Giovanni Battista Ramello


  • Alicia García-HerreraEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_179


Since the second half of the twentieth century, the variations in the exchange system of goods and services have allowed the expansion of integrated distribution networks, based on franchise or other distribution agreements. Franchise offers specific benefits to the firms, reducing transaction costs. Manufacturers and suppliers may have access to new markets, raising capital, sharing risks and saving costs, but maintaining the control of the franchisees’ behaviour through the terms of the contract. Franchising is also attractive to franchisees, because of the backing of a successful and recognized system and the ongoing support of the brand to the entrepreneur. However, certain practices, like resale maintenance or price discrimination, territorial restrictions or refusal to supply (among others) may restrict competition among firms by establishing barriers to entry, and consequently they have been controlled by antitrust law. In the internal relationship, the unequal allocation of rights, with the attribution of broad powers to franchisors, including termination at will, favours the opportunistic behaviour of both parties. The legal approach has considered the vulnerability of the franchisee and the unequal bargaining power between the parties by imposing pre-contractual disclosures rules and regulating the termination. In front of these views, economic analysis has criticised the state interventionism in franchising. Both perspectives, opposite, should be considered in order to have an adequate comprehension of the reality inherent to franchise contracts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Arruñada B, Garicano L, Vázquez L (2001) Contractual allocation of decision rights and incentives: the case of automobile distribution. J Law Econ Org 17:257–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arruñada B, Garicano L, Vázquez L (2005) Completing contracts ex-post: how car manufacturers manage car dealers. Rev Law Econ 1:149–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arruñada B, Vázquez L, Zanarone G (2009) Institutional constraints on organizations: the case of Spanish car dealerships. Manag Decis Econ 30:15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beales H, Muris TJ (1995) The foundations of franchise regulation: issues and evidence. J Corp Financ Contract Organ Gov 2:157–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhattacharya S, Lafontaine F (1995) Double-sided moral hazard and the nature of the share contracts. Rand J Econ 26:761–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blass A, Carlton D (2001) The choice of organizational form in gasoline retailing and the lost of laws that limit that choice. J Law Econ 44:511–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brickley JS, Dark FH (1987) The choice of organizational form: the case of franchising. J Financ Econ 18(2), 401–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brickley JS, Dark FH, Weisbach M (1991) The economic effects on franchise termination laws. J Law Econ 34:101–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brickley JA, Misra S, VAN Horn L (2006) Contract duration: evidence from franchising. J Law Econ 49:173–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caves RE, Murphy WF II (1976) Franchising: firms, markets and intangible assets. South Econ J 42:572–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dnes AW (1993) A case-study analysis of franchise contracts. J leg Stud 22:367–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dnes AW (1996) The economic analysis of franchise contracts. J Inst Theor Econ 152:297–324Google Scholar
  13. Dnes AW (2009) Franchise contracts, opportunism and the quality of law. Entrep Bus Law J 3:258–274Google Scholar
  14. García-Herrera A, Llorca Vivero R (2010) How time influences franchise contracts: the Spanish case. Eur J Law Econ 30:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guriev S, Kvassov D (2005) Contracting on time. Am Econ Rev 95:1369–1385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Joskow P (1987) Contract duration and relationship-specific investments: empirical evidence from coal markets. Am Econ Rev 77:168–185Google Scholar
  17. Klein B (1995) The economics of franchise contracts. J Corp Fin 2:9–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Klick J, Kobayashi B, Ribstein L (2008–2009) Federalism, variation and state regulation on franchise termination. Entrep Bus Law J 3:355–380Google Scholar
  19. Lafontaine F, Scott Morton F (2010) State franchise laws, dealer terminations, and the auto crisis. J Econ Perspect 24:233–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lafontaine F, Shaw KL (1999) The dynamics of franchise contracts. J Polit Econ 107:1041–1080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lafontaine F, Slade ME (2007) Vertical integration and firm boundaries: the evidence. J Econ Lit 45:631–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mathewson GF, Winter RA (1985) The economics of franchise contracts. J Law Econ 28:503–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mathewson GF, Winter RA (1994) Territorial rights in franchise contracts. Econ Inq 32:181–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rey P, Stiglitz J (1995) The role of exclusive territories in producer’s competition. Rand J Econ 26:431–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shane SC (1996) Hybrid organizational arrangements and their implications for firm growth and survival: a study of new franchisors. Acad Manage J 39:216–234Google Scholar
  26. Shane SC (1998) Making new franchise systems work. Strateg Manag J 19:697–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smith RL (1982) Franchise regulation: an economic analysis of state restrictions on automobile distribution. J Law Econ 26:431–451Google Scholar
  28. Zanarone G (2009) Vertical restraints and the law: evidence from automobile franchising. J Law Econ 52:691–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zanerone (2012) Contract adaptation under legal constraints. J Law Econ Org 29:799–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Blair RG, Lafontaine F (2010) The economics of franchising. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Board S (2011) Relational contracts and the value of loyalty. Am Econ Rev 101:3349–3367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Killion W (2008) The modern myth of the vulnerable franchisee: the case for a more balanced view of the franchisor-franchisee relationship. Fr Law J 28:23–33Google Scholar
  4. Lafontaine F, Blair R (2008–2009) The evolution of franchising and franchise contracts: evidence from the United States. Entrep Bus Law J 3:381–434Google Scholar
  5. Martinek M (1992) Moderne Vertragstypen, vol II. Verlag CH Beck, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  6. Martinek M (1987) Franchising. v. Decker, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  7. Martinek M, Flohr E (2011) European distribution law: A commentary, Hart Publishing, Oxford (Hart, R & Parker, J, publishers)Google Scholar
  8. Martinek M, Semler FJ, Flohr E (2015) Handbuch des Vertriebsrechts, 4th edn. CH Beck, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  9. Peters L (2000) The draft Unidroit Model Franchise Disclosure Law and the move towards national legislation. Uniform Law Rev 5(4):717–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sertsios G (2013) Bonding through investments: evidence from franchising. J Law Econ Org 31(1):187–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Vertical Restraints in the Internet Economy (2013) Meeting of working group of competition law. Available at www.bundeskartellamt.de

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de ValenciaValenciaSpain