Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience

Living Edition
| Editors: Dieter Jaeger, Ranu Jung

Recurrent Brain-Computer Interfaces

  • Andrew JacksonEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7320-6_706-1



A recurrent brain-computer interface (or rBCI) exchanges information directly with the nervous system in a bidirectional manner, bypassing sensory and motor modalities. These devices can both sense neural activity (usually by amplifying and processing electrical potentials) and influence it (by electrical or other stimulation methods). Applications include neuroprostheses to replace lost function and neuromodulation devices to renormalize function following neurological injury or disease.

Detailed Description


The earliest recurrent brain-computer interface was the “stimoceiver” built and used by the Spanish physiologist Jose Delgado (Delgado et al. 1968; Horgan 2005) at Yale University. He believed that this wireless device, which combined electrical recording and stimulation of the brain, could be used for treatment of neurological conditions including...


Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Deep Brain Stimulation Action Potential Discharge Hebbian Plasticity Physiological Connection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Berger TW, Ahuja A, Courellis SH, Deadwyler SA, Erinjippurath G, Gerhardt GA, Gholmieh G, Granacki JJ, Hampson R, Hsaio MC, LaCoss J, Marmarelis VZ, Nasiatka P, Srinivasan V, Song D, Tanguay AR, Wills J (2005) Restoring lost cognitive function. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 24:30–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Craggs MD (1975) Cortical control of motor prostheses: using the cord-transected baboon as the primate model for human paraplegia. Adv Neurol 10:91–101PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Delgado JM, Mark V, Sweet W, Ervin F, Weiss G, Bach-Y-Rita G, Hagiwara R (1968) Intracerebral radio stimulation and recording in completely free patients. J Nerv Ment Dis 147:329–340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Horgan J (2005) The forgotten era of brain chips. Sci Am 293:66–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jackson A, Mavoori J, Fetz EE (2006) Long-term motor cortex plasticity induced by an electronic neural implant. Nature 444:56–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jackson A, Zimmermann JB (2012) Neural interfaces for the brain and spinal cord-restoring motor function. Nat Rev Neurol 8:690–699PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Marceglia S, Rossi L, Foffani G, Bianchi A, Cerutti S, Priori A (2007) Basal ganglia local field potentials: applications in the development of new deep brain stimulation devices for movement disorders. Expert Rev Med Devices 4:605–614PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Morrell MJ (2011) Responsive cortical stimulation for the treatment of medically intractable partial epilepsy. Neurology 77:1295–1304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. O’Doherty JE, Lebedev MA, Ifft PJ, Zhuang KZ, Shokur S, Bleuler H, Nicolelis MA (2011) Active tactile exploration using a brain-machine-brain interface. Nature 479:228–231PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rouse AG, Stanslaski SR, Cong P, Jensen RM, Afshar P, Ullestad D, Gupta R, Molnar GF, Moran DW, Denison TJ (2011) A chronic generalized bi-directional brain-machine interface. J Neural Eng 8:036018PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Witt A, Palmigiano A, Neef A, El Hady A, Wolf F, Battaglia D (2013) Controlling the oscillation phase through precisely timed closed-loop optogenetic stimulation: a computational study. Front Neural Circuit 7:49CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of NeuroscienceNewcastle UniversityNewcastle-upon-TyneUK