References
Bartolucci AA, Tendera M, Howard G (2011) Meta-analysis of multiple primary prevention trials of cardiovascular events using aspirin. Am J Cardiol 107(12):1976–1801
Bravais A (1846) Analyse mathamatique sur les probabilities des erreurs de situation d’un point. Mem par Divers Savans 9:255–332
Cancer.org sites (2016) http://www.cancer.org/cancer/ovariancancer/detailedguide/ovarian-cancer-survival-rates. Accessed 15 Aug 2016
Chase JM, Knight TM (2013) Scale-dependent effect sizes of ecological drivers on biodiversity: why standardized sampling is not enough. Ecol Lett 16:17–26
Chen H, Cohen P, Chen S (2010) How big is a big odds ratio: interpreting the magnitude of odds ratios in epidemiological studies. Commun Stat-Simul Comput 39(4):860–864. doi:10.1080/03610911003650383
Cliff N (1996). Ordinal methods for behavioral data analysis. Routledge, Hove, UK
CNN (2016) http://www.cnn.com/election/primaries/polls/in/Rep
Cohen J (1962) The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: a review. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 65:145–153
Cohen J (1969) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic, New York
Cohen J (1977) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic, New York
Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, Revised edn. Academic, New York
Cowles M (1989) Statistics in psychology: an historical perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale
Cramér H (1946) The two-dimensional case, Chapter 21. In: Mathematical methods of statistics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, p 282. ISBN 0-691-08004-6
Dey R (2011) Inference for the K-sample problem based on precedence probabilities. Doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University: Manhattan
Ellis P (2010) The essential guide to effect sizes: statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ISBN 9780521194235
Fritz CO, Morris PE (2012) Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation. J Exp Psychol Gen 141(1):2–18
Galton F (1888) Co-relations and their measurement. Proc R Soc Lond 45:135–145
Glass G (1976) Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educ Res 5(10):3–8
Hays WL (1963) Statistics for psychologists. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York
Hedges LV (1981) Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. J Educ Stat 6(2):106–128
Huberty CJ (2002) A history of effect size indices. Educ Psychol Meas 62(2):227–240
Ivarsson A, Andersen MB, Johnson U, Linwall M (2013) To adjust or not adjust: nonparametric effect sizes, confidence intervals and real-world meaning. Psychol Sport Exerc 14:97–102
Pearson K (1900) On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling. Phil Mag Ser 5 50(302):157–175. doi:10.1080/14786440009463897
Pepe MS (2003) The statistical evaluation of medical tests for classification and prediction. Oxford University Press, New York. ISBN 0-19-856582-8
Rice ME, Harris GT (2005) Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law Hum Behav 29(5):615–620
Rosenthal R, Rosnow RL, Rubin DB (1999) Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: a correlational approach. Cambridge University Press, New York
Ruscio J, Mullen T (2012) Confidence intervals for the probability of superiority effect size measure and the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve. Multivar Behav Res 47(2):201–223
Stigler SM (1986) The history of statistics. Belknap, Cambridge, MA
Sullivan GM, Feinn R (2012) Using effect size – or why the p value is not enough. J Grad Med Educ 4(3):279–282. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1
Teasdale N, Bard C, La Rue J, Fleury M (1993) On the cognitive penetrability of posture control. Exp Aging Res 19:1–13
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media LLC
About this entry
Cite this entry
Dey, R., Mulekar, M.S. (2017). Effect Size as a Measure of Difference Between Two Populations. In: Alhajj, R., Rokne, J. (eds) Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7163-9_110195-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7163-9_110195-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7163-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7163-9
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Computer SciencesReference Module Computer Science and Engineering