Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Introduction to Static and Dynamic Overload of Hip Pathology

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Hip Arthroscopy and Hip Joint Preservation Surgery

  • 2932 Accesses

Abstract

Diagnosis and management of hip pain in the absence of osteoarthritic changes is challenging for the orthopedic surgeon and requires a thorough understanding of the various static and dynamic mechanical factors that affect the hip joint. Dynamic factors occur as a result of abnormal contact between the femoral head and acetabular rim throughout the hip arc of motion, whereas static factors occur while a patient is standing or in an axially loaded position and undergoes asymmetric or increased loading between the femoral head and acetabulum. When considering surgical treatment for these patients, one must appreciate that compensatory motion due to altered hip mechanics can cause specific injury patterns and pain. This chapter aims to clearly describe the static and dynamic factors associated with mechanical hip pain and the importance of addressing all concomitant pathology to develop a thoughtful and effective treatment plan for this patient population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 599.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bedi A, Kelly BT. Femoroacetabular impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95A(1):82–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bedi A, Kelly BT, Khanduja V. Arthroscopic hip preservation surgery: current concepts and perspective. Bone Joint J. 2013;95B(1):10–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Knesek MJ, Skendzel JG, Kelly BT, Bedi A. Approach to the patient evaluation using static and dynamic hip pathomechanics. Oper Tech Sports Med. 2012;20(4):260–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dolan MM, Heyworth BE, Bedi A, Duke G, Kelly BT. CT reveals a high incidence of osseous abnormalities in hips with labral tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(3):831–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bedi A, Dolan M, Leunig M, Kelly BT. Static and dynamic mechanical causes of hip pain. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(2):235–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Clohisy JC, Knaus ER, Hunt DM, Lesher JM, Harris-Hayes M, Prather H. Clinical presentation of patients with symptomatic anterior hip impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(3):638–44.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M, Ganz R. Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage – femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87B(7):1012–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Leunig M, Beck M, Kalhor M, Kim YJ, Werlen S, Ganz R. Fibrocystic changes at anterosuperior femoral neck: prevalence in hips with femoroacetabular impingement. Radiology. 2005;236(1):237–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ganz R, Leunig M, Leunig-Ganz K, Harris WH. The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip – an integrated mechanical concept. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(2):264–72.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nepple JJ, Zebala LP, Clohisy JC. Labral disease associated with femoroacetabular impingement: do we need to correct the structural deformity? J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(6):114–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Larson CM, Giveans MR. Arthroscopic debridement versus refixation of the acetabular labrum associated with femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy. 2009;25(4):369–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Larson CM, Giveans MR, Stone RM. Arthroscopic debridement versus refixation of the acetabular labrum associated with femoroacetabular impingement mean 3.5-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(5):1015–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Allen D, Beaule PE, Ramadan O, Doucette S. Prevalence of associated deformities and hip pain in patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91B(5):589–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnston TL, Schenker ML, Briggs KK, Philippon MJ. Relationship between offset angle alpha and hip chondral injury in femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(6):669–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kelly BT, Bedi A, Robertson CM, Dela Torre K, Giveans MR, Larson CM. Alterations in internal rotation and alpha angles are associated with arthroscopic cam decompression in the hip. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(5):1107–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mardones R, Lara J, Donndorff A, et al. Surgical correction of “cam-type” femoroacetabular impingement: a cadaveric comparison of open versus arthroscopic debridement. Arthroscopy. 2009;25(2):175–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ezoe M, Naito M, Inoue T. The prevalence of acetabular retroversion among various disorders of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88A(2):372–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, Leunig M, Notzli H, Siebenrock KA. Femoroacetabular impingement – a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:112–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ito K, Minka-Ii MA, Leunig M, Werlen S, Ganz R. Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect – a MRI-based quantitative anatomical study of the femoral head-neck offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83B(2):171–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Byrd JWT, Jones KS. Arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement: minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(10):1379–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zumstein M, Hahn F, Sukthankar A, Sussmann PS, Dora C. How accurately can the acetabular rim be trimmed in hip arthroscopy for pincer-type femoral acetabular impingement: a cadaveric investigation. Arthroscopy. 2009;25(2):164–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hetsroni I, Larson CM, Dela Torre K, Zbeda RM, Magennis E, Kelly BT. Anterior inferior iliac spine deformity as an extra-articular source for hip impingement: a series of 10 patients treated with arthroscopic decompression. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(11):1644–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hetsroni I, Poultsides L, Bedi A, Larson CM, Kelly BT. Anterior inferior iliac spine morphology correlates with hip range of motion: a classification system and dynamic model. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(8):2497–503.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Laborie LB, Lehmann TG, Engester IO, Eastwood DM, Engester LB, Rosendahl K. Prevalence of radiographic findings thought to be associated with femoroacetabular impingement in a population-based cohort of 2081 healthy young adults. Radiology. 2011;260(2):494–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nepple JJ, Brophy RH, Matava MJ, Wright RW, Clohisy JC. Radiographic findings of femoroacetabular impingement in National Football League Combine athletes undergoing radiographs for previous hip or groin pain. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(10):1396–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. de Bruin F, Reijnierse M, Farhang-Razi V, Bloem JL. Radiographic signs associated with femoroacetabular impingement occur with high prevalence at all ages in a hospital population. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(11):3131–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jamali AA, Mladenov K, Meyer DC, et al. Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs to assess acetabular retroversion: high validity of the “cross-over-sign”. J Orthop Res. 2007;25(6):758–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kakaty DK, Fischer AF, Hosalkar HS, Siebenrock KA, Tannast M. The ischial spine sign does pelvic tilt and rotation matter? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(3):769–74.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Leunig M, Nho SJ, Turchetto L, Ganz R. Protrusio acetabuli: new insights and experience with joint preservation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(9):2241–50.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Maquet P, Anh TV. On the forces exerted on the hip during gait. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1981;99(1):53–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Matsuda DK. Protrusio acetabuli: contraindication or indication for hip arthroscopy? And the case for arthroscopic treatment of global pincer impingement. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(6):882–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Turgeon TR, Phillips W, Kantor SR, Santore RF. The role of acetabular and femoral osteotomies in reconstructive surgery of the hip and beyond. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;(441):188–99.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Beck M, Leunig M, Parvizi J, Boutier V, Wyss D, Ganz R. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement Part II. Midterm results of surgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;418:67–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Philippon MJ, Stubbs AJ, Schenker ML, Maxwell RB, Ganz R, Leunig M. Arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement – osteoplasty technique and literature review. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(9):1571–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Eijer H, Podeszwa DA, Ganz R, Leunig M. Evaluation and treatment of young adults with femoroacetabular impingement secondary to Perthes’ disease. Hip Int. 2006;16(4):273–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wenger DR, Kishan S, Pring ME. Impingement and childhood hip disease. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2006;15(4):233–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tanzer M, Noiseux N. Osseous abnormalities and early osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:170–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Macnicol MF, Makris D. Distal transfer of the greater trochanter. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73(5):838–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Taneja AK, Bredella MA, Torriani M. Ischiofemoral impingement. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2013;21(1):65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lee S, Kim I, Lee SM, Lee J. Ischiofemoral impingement syndrome. Ann Rehabil Med. 2013;37(1):143–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sussman WI, Han E, Schuenke MD. Quantitative assessment of the ischiofemoral space and evidence of degenerative changes in the quadratus femoris muscle. Surg Radiol Anat. 2013;35(4):273–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Tosun O, Cay N, Bozkurt M, Arslan H. Ischiofemoral impingement in an 11-year-old girl. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2012;18(6):571–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Askling CM, Koulouris G, Saartok T, Werner S, Best TM. Total proximal hamstring ruptures: clinical and MRI aspects including guidelines for postoperative rehabilitation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(3):515–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ali AM, Whitwell D, Ostlere SJ. Case report: imaging and surgical treatment of a snapping hip due to ischiofemoral impingement. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40(5):653–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Dezateux C, Rosendahl K. Developmental dysplasia of the hip. Lancet. 2007;369(9572):1541–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hipp JA, Sugano N, Millis MB, Murphy SB. Planning acetabular redirection osteotomies based on joint contact pressures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;364:134–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Mavcic B, Iglic A, Kralj-Iglic V, Brand RA, Vengust R. Cumulative hip contact stress predicts osteoarthritis in DDH. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(4):884–91.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Millis MB, Murphy SB. Use of computed tomographic reconstruction in planning osteotomies of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;274:154–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Russell ME, Shivanna KH, Grosland NM, Pedersen DR. Cartilage contact pressure elevations in dysplastic hips: a chronic overload model. J Orthop Surg Res. 2006;1:6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Jager M, Wild A, Westhoff B, Krauspe RD. Femoroacetabular impingement caused by a femoral osseous head-neck bump deformity: clinical, radiological, and experimental results. J Orthop Sci. 2004;9(3):256–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Clohisy JC, Keeney JA, Schoenecker PL. Preliminary assessment and treatment guidelines for hip disorders in young adults. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:168–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Schoenecker PL, Clohisy JC, Millis MB, Wenger DR. Surgical management of the problematic hip in adolescent and young adult patients. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19(5):275–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Clohisy JC, Schutz AL, John LS, Schoenecker PL, Wright RW. Periacetabular osteotomy: a systematic literature review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(8):2041–52.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Clohisy JC, St John LC, Nunley RM, Schutz AL, Schoenecker PL. Combined periacetabular and femoral osteotomies for severe hip deformities. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(9):2221–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Hsieh PH, Huang KC, Lee PC, Chang YH. Comparison of periacetabular osteotomy and total hip replacement in the same patient: a two- to ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91B(7):883–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Millis MB, Murphy SB. The Boston experience. Periacetabular osteotomy and anterior arthrotomy via an abductor-sparing surgical approach. Orthopade. 1998;27(11):751–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Nehme A, Trousdale R, Tannous Z, Maalouf G, Puget J, Telmont N. Developmental dysplasia of the hip: is acetabular retroversion a crucial factor? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95(7):511–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Peters CL, Erickson JA, Hines JL. Early results of the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy: the learning curve at an academic medical center. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88A(9):1920–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Clohisy JC, Nunley RM, Carlisle JC, Schoenecker PL. Incidence and characteristics of femoral deformities in the dysplastic hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(1):128–34.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Ejnisman L, Philippon MJ, Lertwanich P, et al. Relationship between femoral anteversion and findings in hips with femoroacetabular impingement. Orthopedics. 2013;36(3):E293–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Tayton E. Femoral anteversion – a necessary angle or an evolutionary vestige? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89B(10):1283–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Akiyama M, Nakashima Y, Fujii M, et al. Femoral anteversion is correlated with acetabular version and coverage in Asian women with anterior and global deficient subgroups of hip dysplasia: a CT study. Skeletal Radiol. 2012;41(11):1411–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Atecs Y, Omeroglu H. Varus derotational osteotomy for persistent dysplasia in CDH. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78B(5):853.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Guenther KP, Thielemann F, Hartmann A, Bernstein P. Combined hip-dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement. Diagnosis and simultaneous surgical treatment. Orthopade. 2008;37(6):577–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Audenaert EA, Peeters I, Vigneron L, Baelde N, Pattyn C. Hip morphological characteristics and range of internal rotation in femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(6):1329–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Fabricant PD, Bedi A, De La Torre K, Kelly BT. Clinical outcomes after arthroscopic psoas lengthening: the effect of femoral version. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(7):965–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Siebenrock KA, Steppacher SD, Haefeli PC, Schwab JM, Tannast M. Valgus hip with high antetorsion causes pain through posterior extraarticular FAI. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(12):3774–80.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Larson CM, Pierce BR, Giveans MR. Treatment of athletes with symptomatic intra-articular hip pathology and athletic pubalgia/sports hernia: a case series. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(6):768–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, 2912 Taubman 1150 W. Medical Ctr Dr., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA

    Michael Knesek & Asheesh Bedi

  2. Summit Orthopedics, Woodbury, MN, USA

    Jack Skendzel

Authors
  1. Michael Knesek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jack Skendzel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Asheesh Bedi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Knesek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA

    Shane J. Nho

  2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland

    Michael Leunig

  3. Minnesota Orthopedic Sports Medicine Institute, Twin Cities Orthopedics - Edina, Edina, Minnesota, USA

    Christopher M. Larson

  4. Department of Orthopaedics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

    Asheesh Bedi

  5. Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service and Center for Hip Preservation Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA

    Bryan T. Kelly

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Knesek, M., Skendzel, J., Bedi, A. (2015). Introduction to Static and Dynamic Overload of Hip Pathology. In: Nho, S., Leunig, M., Larson, C., Bedi, A., Kelly, B. (eds) Hip Arthroscopy and Hip Joint Preservation Surgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6965-0_46

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6965-0_46

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6964-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6965-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation