Surgical Technique: In-Situ Pinning of Unstable Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis

Reference work entry


An unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is one typically associated with prodromal hip pain and/or limp for days or weeks followed an acute event resulting in the patient’s inability to bear weight. The patient will present with severe fracture-like pain. An AP pelvic radiograph is the only radiograph needed to diagnose an unstable SCFE, but a lateral radiograph of the contralateral hip is mandatory to screen for a contralateral SCFE if not obvious on the AP radiograph. Unstable SCFE has been associated with a high rate of avascular necrosis (AVN) and slip progression with in situ pinning of the epiphysis. Biomechanical data from animal models suggests that double-screw fixation is superior to single-screw fixation, but the mechanical superiority must be weighed against the potential complications of a second screw. The author’s preferred technique is to accept the reduction obtained from positioning the patient on the operative table, perform double-screw fixation of the femoral epiphysis with 6.5 mm fully threaded cannulated screws, and decompress the hip capsule. Clinical data suggests that this technique offers superior results (lower rate of AVN and chondrolysis) compared to previous studies.


Slip Capital Femoral Epiphysis Cannulated Screw Positional Reduction Unstable Slip Capital Femoral Epiphysis Open Arthrotomy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Chung SM, Batterman SC, Brighton CT. Shear strength of the human femoral capital epiphyseal plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58(1):94–103.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gelberman RH, et al. The association of femoral retroversion with slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68(7):1000–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mirkopulos N, Weiner DS, Askew M. The evolving slope of the proximal femoral growth plate relationship to slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1988;8(3):268–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Podeszwa DA, et al. Increased acetabular depth may influence physeal stability in slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(7):2151–5.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zupanc O, et al. Shear stress in epiphyseal growth plate is a risk factor for slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008;28(4):444–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Loder RT, Wittenberg B, DeSilva G. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis associated with endocrine disorders. J Pediatr Orthop. 1995;15(3):349–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Loder RT, et al. Acute slipped capital femoral epiphysis: the importance of physeal stability. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75(8):1134–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Loder RT. What is the cause of avascular necrosis in unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis and what can be done to lower the rate? J Pediatr Orthop. 2013;33 Suppl 1:S88–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sankar WN, et al. The unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis: risk factors for osteonecrosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2010;30(6):544–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ziebarth K, et al. Clinical stability of slipped capital femoral epiphysis does not correlate with intraoperative stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(8):2274–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stasikelis PJ, et al. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Prediction of contralateral involvement. J Bone Joint Surg. 1996;78(8 (Print)):1149–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zide JR, Popejoy D, Birch JG. Revised modified Oxford bone score: a simpler system for prediction of contralateral involvement in slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2011;31(2):159–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Popejoy D, Emara K, Birch J. Prediction of contralateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis using the modified Oxford bone age score. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012;32(3):290–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sanders JO, et al. Progressive slippage after pinning for slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2002;22(2):239–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Karol LA, et al. Single versus double screw fixation for treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a biomechanical analysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1992;12(6):741–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kibiloski LJ, et al. Biomechanical analysis of single- versus double-screw fixation in slipped capital femoral epiphysis at physiological load levels. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994;14(5):627–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Segal LS, Jacobson JA, Saunders MM. Biomechanical analysis of in situ single versus double screw fixation in a nonreduced slipped capital femoral epiphysis model. J Pediatr Orthop. 2006;26(4):479–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kishan S, et al. Biomechanical stability of single-screw versus two-screw fixation of an unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis model: effect of screw position in the femoral neck. J Pediatr Orthop. 2006;26(5):601–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Herrera-Soto JA, et al. Increased intracapsular pressures after unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008;28(7):723–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Goodwin RC, et al. Screw head impingement after in situ fixation in moderate and severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007;27(3):319–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chen RC, et al. Urgent reduction, fixation, and arthrotomy for unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009;29(7):687–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallasUSA
  2. 2.Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for ChildrenDallasUSA

Personalised recommendations