Advertisement

Physical Examination of the Hip and Pelvis

  • Hal D. Martin
  • Ian J. Palmer
  • Munif A. Hatem
Reference work entry

Abstract

The clinical examination of the hip is a five-layer comprehensive assessment of the hip joint. In order to appreciate this achievement of symphonic function, it is important to understand the balance and interrelationship that each layer has upon the other in both a static and dynamic fashion. Optimally, the hip will be recognized early as the source of the complaint which is dependent upon a consistent method of interpreting the history and clinical examination of the hip. The standardized physical examination produces a fixed background, on which to produce the shadow of hip pathology and allowing for a five-layer comprehensive diagnosis.

Keywords

Kinematic Chain Femoroacetabular Impingement Femoral Anteversion Contracture Test Tensor Fascia Lata 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Draovitch P, Edelstein J, Kelly BT. The layer concept: utilization in determining the pain generators, pathology and how structure determines treatment. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2012;5:1–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Martin HD, Savage A, Braly BA, Palmer IJ, Beall DP, Kelly B. The function of the hip capsular ligaments: a quantitative report. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:188–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Martin HD, Hatem M, Kivlan BR, Martin RL. The function of the ligamentum teres in limiting hip rotation. Arthroscopy. 2014 (in review).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bedi A, Dolan M, Leunig M, Kelly BT. Static and dynamic mechanical causes of hip pain. Arthroscopy. 2011;27:235–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Birmingham PM, Kelly BT, Jacobs R, McGrady L, Wang M. The effect of dynamic femoroacetabular impingement on pubic symphysis motion: a cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:1113–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hammoud S, Bedi A, Magennis E, Meyers WC, Kelly BT. High incidence of athletic pubalgia symptoms in professional athletes with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(10):1388–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Verrall GM, Slavotinek JP, Barnes PG, Esterman A, Oakeshott RD, Spriggins AJ. Hip joint range of motion restriction precedes athletic chronic groin injury. J Sci Med Sport. 2007;10:463–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Powers CM. The influence of abnormal hip mechanics on knee injury: a biomechanical perspective. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40:42–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    DeAngelis NA, Busconi BD. Assessment and differential diagnosis of the painful hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;406(1):11–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kujala UM, Kaprio J, Sarna S. Osteoarthritis of weight bearing joints of lower limbs in former elite male athletes. Br Med J. 1994;308:231–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:737–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Byrd JW, Jones KS. Prospective analysis of hip arthroscopy with 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2000;16:578–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Martin RL, Mohtadi NG, Safran MR, Leunig M, Martin HD, McCarthy J, Guanche CA, Kelly BT, Byrd JW, Clohisy JC, Philippon MJ, Sekiya JK. Differences in physician and patient ratings of items used to assess hip disorders. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:1508–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mohtadi NG, Griffin DR, Pedersen ME, Chan D, Safran MR, Parsons N, Sekiya JK, Kelly BT, Werle JR, Leunig M, McCarthy JC, Martin HD, Byrd JW, Philippon MJ, Martin RL, Guanche CA, Clohisy JC, Sampson TG, Kocher MS, Larson CM. The development and validation of a self-administered quality-of-life outcome measure for young, active patients with symptomatic hip disease: the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33). Arthroscopy. 2012;28:595–605. quiz 606–510 e591.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Griffin DR, Parsons N, Mohtadi NG, Safran MR. A short version of the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) for use in routine clinical practice. Arthroscopy. 2012;28:611–6. quiz 616–618.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ware Jr JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ware Jr J, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Clohisy JC, Keeney JA, Schoenecker PL. Preliminary assessment and treatment guidelines for hip disorders in young adults. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:168–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Martin HD, Kelly BT, Leunig M, Philippon MJ, Clohisy JC, Martin RL, Sekiya JK, Pietrobon R, Mohtadi NG, Sampson TG, Safran MR. The pattern and technique in the clinical evaluation of the adult hip: the common physical examination tests of hip specialists. Arthroscopy. 2010;26:161–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Martin HD, Palmer IJ. History and physical examination of the hip: the basics. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2013;6:219–25.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cibere J, Thorne A, Bellamy N, Greidanus N, Chalmers A, Mahomed N, Shojania K, Kopec J, Esdaile JM. Reliability of the hip examination in osteoarthritis: effect of standardization. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59:373–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Martin HD. Clinical examination of the hip. Operat Tech Orthop. 2005;15:177–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Byrd JW. Operative hip arthroscopy. New York: Springer; 2005. p. 78–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Perry J. Gait analysis normal and pathological function. Thorofare: SLACK; 1992.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, Leunig M, Notzli H, Siebenrock KA. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:112–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McCarthy JC, Busconi BD, Owens BD. Assessment of the painful hip. In: McCarthy JC, editor. Early hip disorders. New York: Springer; 2003. p. 3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Philippon M, Zehms C, Briggs K, Manchester D, Kuppersmith D. Hip instability in the athlete. Operat Tech Sport Med. 2007;15:189–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Martin RL, Palmer I, Martin HD. Ligamentum teres: a functional description and potential clinical relevance. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20:1209–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Audenaert EA, Peeters I, Vigneron L, Baelde N, Pattyn C. Hip morphological characteristics and range of internal rotation in femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:1329–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Martin HD, Kivlan BR, Palmer IJ, Martin RL. Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for sciatic nerve entrapment in the gluteal region. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013; [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Szadek KM, van der Wurff P, van Tulder MW, Zuurmond WW, Perez RS. Diagnostic validity of criteria for sacroiliac joint pain: a systematic review. J Pain. 2009. 10(4):354–68.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hal D. Martin
    • 1
  • Ian J. Palmer
    • 1
  • Munif A. Hatem
    • 1
  1. 1.Baylor University Medical Center, Hip Preservation CenterDallasUSA

Personalised recommendations