Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience

2015 Edition
| Editors: Dieter Jaeger, Ranu Jung

Invertebrate Sensory Systems: Overview

  • Fabrizio Gabbiani
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6675-8_482

Detailed Description

Invertebrate neurobiology has long been at the forefront of computational neuroscience, starting with the mathematical model of the biophysical basis of the action potential by Hodgkin and Huxley in the squid giant axon almost 50 years ago (Hogdkin and Huxley 1952). Many invertebrate systems are highly suitable for detailed modeling because of their relatively compact size and the fact that their neurons can often be uniquely identified. This feature allows the formulation of precise descriptions of their behaviors and simplifies the interpretation of experimental results. Yet, as Hodgkin and Huxley’s seminal analysis of action potential mechanisms has proved, invertebrate models possess characteristics similar to those of vertebrates and the computational principles derived from either type of nervous systems have been found universally applicable, even if details of the mechanistic implementations differ.

This entry of the Encyclopedia focuses on the sensory...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Barlow HB (1961) Possible principles underlying the transformation of sensory messages. In: Rosenblith W (ed) Sensory communication. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 217–234, Chapter 13Google Scholar
  2. Hassenstein B, Reichardt W (1956) Systemtheoretische Analyse der Zeit-Reihenfolgen- und Vorzeichenauswertung bei der Bewegungsperzeption des Rüsselkäfers Chlorophanus. Z Naturforsch 11b:513–524Google Scholar
  3. Hogdkin AL, Huxley AF (1952) A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol 117:500–544Google Scholar
  4. Oláh S, Füle M, Komlósi G, Varga C, Báldi R, Barzó P, Tamás G (2009) Regulation of cortical microcircuits by unitary GABA-mediated volume transmission. Nature 461:1278–1281PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. van Santen JPH, Sperling G (1985) Elaborated Reichardt detectors. J Opt Soc Am A 2:300–321PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeuroscienceBaylor College of MedicineHoustonUSA