Skip to main content

Green Innovation

Synonyms

Eco-efficiency; Eco-innovation; Environmental innovation

Key Concepts and Definition of Terms

Green innovation comprises all type of innovations that contribute to the creation of key products, services, or processes to reduce the harm, impact, and deterioration of the environment at the same time that optimizes the use of natural resources. Such type of innovation develops a critical role these days because it channels an appropriate use of the natural resources to improve the human well-being. Moreover, the creation and incorporation of changes in products and production processes could contribute to sustainable development.

The concept of green innovation is grounded as a development of other synonyms or related constructs (i.e., environmental innovation, eco-innovation, eco-efficiency), which have been frequently used indistinctly in the literature. Following Kemp and Pearson (2007) eco-innovation involves constructing, assimilating, or exploiting a product, service,...

Keywords

  • Competitive Advantage
  • Green Product
  • Supply Chain Networking
  • Organizational Capability
  • Green Innovation

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Aguilera-Caracuel J, Ortiz-de-Mandojana N. Green innovation and financial performance an institutional approach. Organ Environ. 2013;26(4):365–85.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Albort-Morant G, Leal-Millán A, Cepeda-Carrión G. The antecedents of green innovation performance: a model of learning and capabilities. J Bus Res. 2016; doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.052. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azzone G, Noci G. Seeing ecology and green innovations as a source of change. J Organ Chang Manag. 1998;11(2):94–111.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag. 1991;17(1):99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang CH. The influence of corporate environmental ethics on competitive advantage: the mediation role of green innovation. J Bus Ethics. 2011;104(3):361–70.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YS. The driver of green innovation and green image – green core competence. J Bus Ethics. 2008;81(3):531–43.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CJ, Huang JW. Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance – the mediating role of knowledge management capacity. J Bus Res. 2009;62(1):104–14.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YS, Lai SB, Wen CT. The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. J Bus Ethics. 2006;67(4):331–9.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YS, Chang CH, Wu FS. Origins of green innovations: the differences between proactive and reactive green innovations. Manag Decis. 2012;50(3):368–98.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YS, Chang CH, Lin YH. The determinants of green radical and incremental innovation performance: green shared vision, green absorptive capacity, and green organizational ambidexterity. Sustainability. 2014;6(11):7787–806.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chiou TY, Chan HK, Lettice F, Chung SH. The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev. 2011;47(6):822–36.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dresner S. Principles of sustainability. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant RM. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strateg Manag J. 1996;17(S2):109–22.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hart SL. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Acad Manag Rev. 1995;20(4):986–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp R, Pearson P. Final report of the MEI project measuring eco innovation. UM Merit Maastricht. 2007. Retrieved from http://www.merit.unu.edu/MEI/deliverables/MEI%20D15%20Final%20report%20about%20measuring%20eco-innovation.pdf

  • Kemp R, Arundel A, Smith K. Survey indicators for environmental innovation. Paper presented to conference “Towards Environmental Innovation Systems” in Garmisch-Partenkirchen; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klassen RD, Whybark DC. Environmental management in operations: the selection of environmental technologies. Decision Sci. 1999;30(3):601–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leal-Millán A, Roldán JL, Leal-Rodríguez AL, Ortega-Gutiérrez J. IT and relationship learning in networks as drivers of green innovation and customer capital: evidence from the automobile sector. J Knowl Manag. 2016;20(3):444–64.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Leal-Millán A, Albort-Morant G, Leal-Rodríguez AL, Ariza-Montes A. Relationship learning strategy as a mechanism of network and the effectiveness of green innovation, Chapter 6. In: Peris-Otiz M, Ferreira JJ, editors. Cooperation and networks in small business strategy. Springer International Publishing; 2017. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leal-Rodríguez AL, Roldán JL, Ariza-Montes A, Leal-Millán A. From potential absorptive capacity to innovation outcomes in project teams: the conditional mediating role of the realized absorptive capacity in a relational learning context. Int J Proj Manag. 2014;32:894–907.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Martelo-Landroguez S, Cegarra-Navarro JG. Linking knowledge corridors to customer value through knowledge processes. J Knowl Manag. 2014;18(2):342–65.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I. The knowledge-creating company. Harv Bus Rev. 1991;69(6):96–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor GC, Leifer R, Paulson AS, Peters LS. Grabbing lighting: building a capability for breakthrough innovation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME, Van der Linde C. Green and competitive. Harv Bus Rev. 1995;73(5):120–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherry R, Stubberud HA. Green innovation in Germany: a comparison by business size. J Int Bus Res. 2013;12(1):47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manag J. 1997;18(7):509–33.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng ML, Wang R, Chiu AS, Geng Y, Lin YH. Improving performance of green innovation practices under uncertainty. J Clean Prod. 2013;40:71–82.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Walley N, Whitehead B. It’s not easy being green. Harv Bus Rev. 1994;72(3):46–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong SKS. The influence of green product competitiveness on the success of green product innovation. Empirical evidence from the Chinese electrical and electronics industry. Eur J Innov Manag. 2012;15(4):468–90.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Zacharia ZG, Nix NW, Lusch RF. Capabilities that enhance outcomes of an episodic supply chain collaboration. J Oper Manag. 2011;29:591–603.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra S, George G. Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad Manag Rev. 2002;27:185–203.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Leal-Millán .

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Leal-Millán, A., Leal-Rodríguez, A.L., Albort-Morant, G. (2017). Green Innovation. In: Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6616-1_200021-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6616-1_200021-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6616-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6616-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social Sciences