Skip to main content

Analogies and Analogical Reasoning in Invention

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship

Synonyms

Analogy; Creativity; Invention

The Concepts “Analogy” and “Invention”

Analogy

An analogy is usually considered as a structural mapping between a source (base) and a target domain. To establish an analogy, common substructures of the two domains are identified and mapped to each other, resulting in an analogical relation. The establishment of an analogy is usually governed by certain constraints, like systematicity, structural consistency, or a one-to-one restriction on possible mappings, although there is no general accepted set of such principles. Analogy-making can also be regarded as the establishment of a generalization, identifying an abstract core that consists of the common structures of both domains and ignores surface appearance and domain peculiarities (cf. Fig. 1). Analogies are usually not judged right or wrong; rather, they can be more or less plausible, based on the degree of structural coherence that they exhibit, possibly depending on the context and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Altshuller G. Creativity as an exact science. New York: Gordon & Breach; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argand J-R. Philosophie mathématique. Essai sur une manière de représenter les quantités imaginaires, dans les constructions géométriques. Ann Mat Pura Appl. 1813;4:133–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besold TR, Kühnberger K-U, Plaza E. Analogy, amalgams, and concept blending. In: Langley P, editor. Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference on Advances in Cognitive Systems (ACS); 2015 May 28–31; Atlanta: CogSys.org. 2015; 23. Available from: http://www.cogsys.org/papers/ACS2015/poster23.pdf. Accessed 29 Oct 2016.

  • Burki L, Cavalluci D. Measuring the results of creative acts in R & D: literature review and perspectives. In: Cavalluci D, de Guio R, Cascini G, editors. Building innovation pipelines through computer-aided innovation, CAI 2011. Heidelberg: Springer; 2011. p. 163–77.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky N. Syntactic structure. The Hague: Mouton; 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Do EY, Gross MD. Drawing analogies: finding visual references by sketching. Proceedings, Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture, 1995 National Conference; Seattle; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner D. Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cogn Sci. 1983;7:155–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel AK. Design, analogy and creativity. IEEE Exp. 1997;12(3):62–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holyoak KJ, Thagard P. Mental leaps: analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummel JE, Holyoak KJ. Relational reasoning in a neurally-plausible cognitive architecture: an overview of the LISA project. Cogn Stud Bull Jpn Cogn Sci Soc. 2003;10:58–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokinov B, Petrov AA. Integrating memory and reasoning in analogy-making: the AMBR model. In: Gentner D, Holyoak KJ, Kokinov B, editors. The analogical mind: perspectives from cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2001. p. 59–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff G, Núñez R. Where mathematics comes from: how the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez M, Besold TR, Abdel-Fattah A, Gust H, Schmidt M, Krumnack U, Kühnberger K-U. Theory blending as a framework for creativity in systems for general intelligence. In: Wang P, Goertzel B, editors. Theoretical foundations of artificial general intelligence. New York: Springer; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGraw GE. Letter spirit (part one): emergent high-level perception of grid letters using fluid concepts [PhD thesis]. Indiana University; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polya G. Mathematics and plausible reasoning: induction and analogy in mathematics. Princeton University Press: Princeton; 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt M, Krumnack U, Gust H, Kühnberger K-U. Heuristic-driven theory projection: an overview. In: Prade H, Richard G, editors. Computational approaches to analogical reasoning: current trends. Berlin: Springer; 2014. p. 163–94.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schoen D. Displacement of concepts. New York: Humanities Press; 1963.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulf Krumnack .

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Krumnack, U., Kühnberger, KU., Schwering, A., Besold, T.R. (2017). Analogies and Analogical Reasoning in Invention. In: Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6616-1_128-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6616-1_128-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6616-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6616-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics