Encyclopedia of Signaling Molecules

Living Edition
| Editors: Sangdun Choi

Eotaxins (CCL11, CCL24, CCL26)

  • Timothy John Williams
  • James Edward Pease
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6438-9_101627-1


Horseshoe Crab CCR3 Antagonist Motif Chemokine Eosinophil Migration Bone Marrow Eosinophil 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Eotaxin-1 : C-C motif chemokine 11; CCL11; Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 11; Eosinophil chemotactic protein; Eotaxin; SCYA11; Small-inducible cytokine subfamily A (Cys-Cys), member 11 (eotaxin); Small-inducible cytokine A11

Eotaxin-2 : C-C motif chemokine 24; CCL24; Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 24; CK-beta-6; Ckb-6; Eosinophil chemotactic protein 2; MPIF-2; MPIF2; Myeloid progenitor inhibitory factor 2; SCYA24; Small-inducible cytokine subfamily A (Cys-Cys), member 24; Small-inducible cytokine A24

Eotaxin-3 : C-C motif chemokine ligand 26; CCL26; IMAC; MIP-4a; MIP-4alpha; SCYA26; TSC-1

Historical Background

Eosinophils are a subpopulation of granulocytes in the blood, identified by their bilobed nucleus and distinctive cytoplasmic granules staining pink with eosin. Eosinophils or related cells are found in mammals and also in other animals including birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish, and insects. Eosinophil-like cells are also present in invertebrates such as the horseshoe crab and sea cucumber. Eosinophils are part of our host defense system, especially to parasitic helminths, and localized tissue eosinophilia is associated with worm infections. There is also evidence that eosinophils can have a role in fungal and viral infections. Of clinical importance, tissue eosinophilia is a characteristic feature of allergy and asthma, which are thought to represent an aberrant response to otherwise innocuous molecules in the environment. Eosinophils produce an arsenal of cytotoxic molecules in their role in combating parasites. These same molecules can also cause tissue injury and dysfunction in allergy and asthma. Hence, eosinophils have become a major therapeutic target with a focus on the signaling molecules mediating their recruitment in allergy and asthma. Current clinical evidence suggests that eosinophils have a strong association with airway remodeling and disease exacerbations in severe asthma. The attraction of eosinophils as a therapeutic target is that their numbers can be reduced to low numbers (e.g., by corticosteroids) without overt effects on host defense to common pathogens, such as bacteria. This is in contrast to neutrophils, where interference with recruitment severely compromises survival in the face of assault by pathogens in the environment.

The eosinophil was identified by the German scientist, Paul Ehrlich, in 1879. Ehrlich stained blood cells and tissues with aniline dyes and discovered neutrophils, basophils, lymphocytes, mast cells, and eosinophils by their differential staining characteristics. The highly basic cytosolic granules in a small subpopulation of blood cells stained pink with the acid dye eosin, hence “eosinophils.” Ehrlich observed high numbers of eosinophils in the sputum of asthmatic patients and realized that there was a close relationship between eosinophilia and the severity of asthma. Significantly, he proposed the existence of a “material which attracts eosinophils.” He also postulated that eosinophils and neutrophils possessed different “chemotactic irritability” and that eosinophils only migrate to sites where a “specific stimulating substance” is present (Gleich 2013).

The “specific substance” became the subject of many investigations, and several large and small molecules were found to have eosinophil chemoattractant activity, but none of these could account for the selective eosinophil recruitment that can occur in allergic reactions. A breakthrough occurred in 1994 with the description of a small protein produced in vivo with potent and selective chemoattractant activity for eosinophils (Jose et al. 1994). Bronchoalveolar washings were collected from allergen-challenged sensitized guinea pigs in vivo and tested in the skin of unsensitized bioassay guinea pigs, also in vivo. The bioassay animals were preinjected intravenously with radiolabeled eosinophils, and the accumulation of these cells provided a highly sensitive and selective measurement of eosinophil chemoattractant activity in the fluid. Purification and sequencing revealed a CC chemokine which was named “eotaxin,” condensed from eosinophil chemotaxin. The sequence of eotaxin was used to identify the molecule in several species including mouse (Rothenberg et al. 1995) and human (Ponath et al. 1996). Subsequently, chemokines with similar activity but low sequence similarity were discovered and termed eotaxin-2/CCL24 and eotaxin-3/CCL26 (Forssmann et al. 1997; Shinkai et al. 1999). The original eotaxin molecule is now usually referred to as eotaxin-1/CCL11.

Cell-Cell Signaling from Tissue Cells to Circulating Blood Eosinophils

Th2 lymphocytes regulate eosinophil recruitment in allergic reactions. However, immunostaining of tissues in human asthma and animal models revealed that eotaxins are secreted by a variety of tissue cells including epithelial cells, macrophages, endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, and eosinophils themselves. In vitro experiments showed that cytokines produced by Th2 cells, particularly IL-4 and IL-13, switched on the production of eotaxins by tissue cells. Eotaxins signal to eosinophils selectively via the chemokine receptor CCR3 that is highly expressed by these cells and certain other cells, such as basophils. Eotaxins act on CCR3 on eosinophils within venules and induce their adhesion to the luminal surface of the endothelium by interactions between α4β1 integrin and VCAM. This is followed by migration of the cells through endothelial junctions, the perivascular basement membrane, and then into the tissues (Figure 1).
Fig. 1

Dendritic cells (DC) present inhaled allergen to Th2 cells, resulting in the generation of the cytokines IL-4 and IL-13. These cytokines act upon bronchial epithelial cells and other tissue cells to stimulate the production of eotaxins (shaded triangle). CCR3 on the surface of eosinophils (Eo) detects eotaxins and induces firm adhesion of the cells to the vascular endothelium. Eosinophils subsequently migrate through the endothelium into the tissue.

The Th2 cytokine IL-5 has been regarded as chemotactic for eosinophils. The IL-5 receptor is highly expressed on eosinophils, and the cytokine is critically important in eosinophilopoiesis in the bone marrow. IL-5 induces eosinophil migration in Boyden chamber assays in vitro, but this is independent of a chemotactic gradient and is caused by increased random migration or chemokinesis. Experiments in vivo have shown IL-5 to be poor in mediating eosinophil migration into tissues but very effective in releasing the cells from the bone marrow by inducing migration of the cells into sinusoids (Collins et al. 1995). Further evidence was obtained that IL-5 is produced in the sensitized lung on exposure to allergen and travels as a circulating signal in the blood to the bone marrow where it releases mature eosinophils (Humbles et al. 1997). As eosinophil numbers in the blood are normally low, this system ensures efficient recruitment to tissues in response to locally generated eotaxins. Circulating eotaxins can also cause the release of bone marrow eosinophils and synergize with IL-5 to induce this effect by combining chemotactic (eotaxins) and chemokinetic (IL-5) actions (Palframan et al. 1998).

The Eotaxin Receptor CCR3

Several groups simultaneously identified CCR3 as the cell surface receptor for the eotaxins. A member of the class A family of G protein-coupled receptors, CCR3 binds all three eotaxins along with at least another six chemokines with varying potency (CCL5, CCL7, CCL8, CCL13, CCL15, and CCL28) making it one of the most promiscuous chemokine receptors. Quite how CCR3 can interact productively with so many different chemokines is not completely understood, although the highly acidic second extracellular loop containing the EELFEET amino acid motif is likely involved in electrostatic interactions with the predominantly basic chemokines. The interaction of eotaxin-1 with regions of CCR3 has been studied by the use of chimeric receptor constructs (Pease et al. 1998), NMR (Mayer and Stone 2001), and small-molecule agonists which mimic the actions of eotaxin-1 (Wise et al. 2007a). Collectively, the work supports a two-step model of CCR3 activation in which the core of eotaxin-1 interacts with the receptor N-terminus (tethering the ligand to the receptor), and subsequent interactions with the extracellular (Wise et al. 2007b) loops orientate the chemokine such that the N-terminus of eotaxin-1 can insert into an intrahelical pocket inducing receptor activation.

Therapeutic Potential

CCR3 antagonists have been developed by several companies. Flow cytometry was employed to measure functional responses of human eosinophils to chemokines (the “GAFS” shape change assay). This showed that a subpopulation of donors had eosinophils that responded to both CCR3 and CCR1 agonists. The GAFS technique was used in the first publication demonstrating a CCR3 antagonist, one that could also antagonize CCR1 (Sabroe et al. 2000). A small molecule CCR3 antagonist was tested in clinical trials in asthma patients but did not demonstrate efficacy (Neighbour et al. 2014). To date, no CCR3 antagonists have reached the market (Pease and Horuk 2014). A potent therapeutic antibody (CAT-213, iCo-008, bertilimumab) that neutralizes eotaxin-1 was developed by Cambridge Antibody Technology (now Medimmune UK) (Main et al. 2006). The antibody has been licensed to iCo Therapeutics and to Immune Pharmaceuticals, for testing in clinical trials.

The eotaxins have been evaluated as therapeutic targets in asthma and in allergic diseases in general (for review see: Ahmadi et al. 2016). They are also used as biomarkers in clinical trials. Eotaxins are thought to be important in diseases of the gastrointestinal tract (Abonia and Rothenberg 2012), and trials are planned in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Unexpectedly, eotaxins are implicated in diseases, independently of their action on eosinophils. CCR3 is expressed on endothelial cells in vessels overgrowing the macula in age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Locally produced eotaxins are thought to mediate angiogenesis in the retina in AMD (Takeda et al. 2009). Bertilimumab is being evaluated for the treatment of AMD and other eye diseases. Early studies showed that CCR3 is expressed by microglia in the brain. CCR3 can act as a co-receptor for HIV infection, leading to the suggestion that CCR3 may be involved in the later stages of HIV infection where the brain becomes affected. In support of this, it was shown that HIV can infect microglia in vitro and that this can be suppressed by eotaxin-1 or an antibody to CCR3 (He et al. 1997). Interestingly, there is more recent evidence of a role for circulating eotaxin-1 in neurodegenerative diseases. Villeda et al. 2011 carried out cross-circulation studies between old and young mice. They concluded that circulating levels of eotaxin-1 rise during aging and that this suppresses neurogenesis and impairs cognitive function (Villeda et al. 2011). Increasing levels of eotaxin-1 with age were also observed in human plasma and cerebral spinal fluid, raising interesting possibilities for future therapy. This potentially important emerging field is the subject of a recent review, where the evidence for underlying mechanisms is discussed (Huber et al. 2016).


To conclude, the discovery of the eotaxin family of chemokines proved Ehrlich’s postulate correct, namely that a “material” exists which selectively recruits eosinophils. Targeting the eotaxins or their specific receptor CCR3 in a disease setting has to date proved challenging as with other chemokines, although the involvement of the eotaxins in additional disease areas may drive further progress.




We thank Asthma UK and the Wellcome Trust for supporting our research.


  1. Abonia JP, Rothenberg ME. Eosinophilic esophagitis: rapidly advancing insights. Annu Rev Med. 2012;63(1):421–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmadi Z, Hassanshahi G, Khorramdelazad H, Zainodini N, Koochakzadeh L. An overlook to the characteristics and roles played by Eotaxin Network in the pathophysiology of food allergies: allergic asthma and atopic dermatitis. Inflammation. 2016;39(3):1253–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Collins PD, Marleau S, Griffiths-Johnson DA, Jose PJ, Williams TJ. Cooperation between interleukin-5 and the chemokine eotaxin to induce eosinophil accumulation in vivo. J Exp Med. 1995;182(4):1169–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Forssmann U, Uguccioni M, Loetscher P, Dahinden CA, Langen H, Thelen M, et al. Eotaxin-2, a novel CC chemokine that is selective for the chemokine receptor CCR3, and acts like eotaxin on human eosinophil and basophil leukocytes. J Exp Med. 1997;185(12):2171–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Gleich GJ. Historical overview and perspective on the role of the eosinophil in health and disease. In: Lee JJ, Rosenberg HF, editors. Eosinophils in health and disease. London: Elsevier; 2013.Google Scholar
  6. He J, Chen Y, Farzan M, Choe H, Gartner S, Busciglio J et al. CCR3 and CCR5 are co-receptors fro HIV-1 infection of microglia Nature 1997;385(6617):645–9.Google Scholar
  7. Huber AK, Giles DA, Segal BM, Irani DN. An emerging role for eotaxins in neurodegenerative disease. Clin Immunol. 2016 (in press).Google Scholar
  8. Humbles AA, Conroy DM, Marleau S, Rankin SM, Palframan RT, Proudfoot AE, et al. Kinetics of eotaxin generation and its relationship to eosinophil accumulation in allergic airways disease: analysis in a guinea pig model in vivo. J Exp Med. 1997;186(4):601–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Jose PJ, Griffiths-Johnson DA, Collins PD, Walsh DT, Moqbel R, Totty NF, et al. Eotaxin: a potent eosinophil chemoattractant cytokine detected in a guinea pig model of allergic airways inflammation. J Exp Med. 1994;179(3):881–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Main S, Handy R, Wilton J, Smith S, Williams L, Fou LD, et al. A potent human anti-eotaxin1 antibody, CAT-213: isolation by phage display and in vitro and in vivo efficacy. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006;319(3):1395–404.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mayer MR, Stone MJ. Identification of receptor binding and activation determinants in the N-terminal and N-loop regions of the CC chemokine eotaxin. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(17):13911–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Neighbour H, Boulet LP, Lemiere C, Sehmi R, Leigh R, Sousa AR, et al. Safety and efficacy of an oral CCR3 antagonist in patients with asthma and eosinophilic bronchitis: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Clin Exp Allergy. 2014;44(4):508–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Palframan RT, Collins PD, Williams TJ, Rankin SM. Eotaxin induces a rapid release of eosinophils and their progenitors from the bone marrow. Blood. 1998;91(7):2240–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Pease JE, Horuk R. Recent progress in the development of antagonists to the chemokine receptors CCR3 and CCR4. Expert Opin Drug Discovery. 2014;9(5):467–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pease JE, Wang J, Ponath PD, Murphy PM. The N-terminal extracellular segments of the chemokine receptors CCR1 and CCR3 are determinants for MIP-1alpha and eotaxin binding, respectively, but a second domain is essential for efficient receptor activation. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(32):19972–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ponath PD, Qin S, Ringler DJ, Clark-Lewis I, Wang J, Kassam N, et al. Cloning of the human eosinophil chemoattractant, eotaxin. Expression, receptor binding, and functional properties suggest a mechanism for the selective recruitment of eosinophils. J Clin Invest. 1996;97(3):604–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Rothenberg ME, Luster AD, Leder P. Murine eotaxin: an eosinophil chemoattractant inducible in endothelial cells and in interleukin 4-induced tumor suppression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92(19):8960–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Sabroe I, Peck MJ, Van Keulen BJ, Jorritsma A, Simmons G, Clapham PR, et al. A small molecule antagonist of chemokine receptors CCR1 and CCR3. Potent inhibition of eosinophil function and CCR3-mediated HIV-1 entry. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(34):25985–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Shinkai A, Yoshisue H, Koike M, Shoji E, Nakagawa S, Saito A, et al. A novel human CC chemokine, eotaxin-3, which is expressed in IL-4-stimulated vascular endothelial cells, exhibits potent activity toward eosinophils. J Immunol. 1999;163(3):1602–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Takeda A, Baffi JZ, Kleinman ME, Cho WG, Nozaki M, Yamada K, et al. CCR3 is a target for age-related macular degeneration diagnosis and therapy. Nature. 2009;460(7252):225–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Villeda SA, Luo J, Mosher KI, Zou B, Britschgi M, Bieri G, et al. The ageing systemic milieu negatively regulates neurogenesis and cognitive function. Nature. 2011;477(7362):90–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Wise EL, Duchesnes C, da Fonseca PCA, Allen RA, Williams TJ, Pease JE. Small molecule receptor agonists and antagonists of CCR3 provide insight into mechanisms of chemokine receptor activation. J Biol Chem ASBMB. 2007a;282(38):27935–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wise EL, Duchesnes C, da Fonseca PCA, Allen RA, Williams TJ, Pease JE. Small antagonists of CCR3 provide insight into mechanisms of chemokine receptor activation. J Biol Chem ASBMB. 2007b;282(38):27935–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Heart and Lung InstituteImperial College LondonLondonUK