Molecular Life Sciences

Living Edition
| Editors: Robert D. Wells, Judith S. Bond, Judith Klinman, Bettie Sue Siler Masters, Ellis Bell

Regulation of Genetic Element Mobility

Living reference work entry


Mobilization of genetic elements is typically a highly regulated process. Mobile elements must be active enough to maintain presence within a host, yet not move so frequently that they harm the host. Mobilization can be coordinated with cellular metabolism and timed to coincide with specific cellular events. Expression of recombinase genes is a key step for the activation of mobility; however, there are additional factors that modulate recombinase activity. The formation of nucleoprotein complexes that are capable of DNA strand exchange is also a key event that is heavily regulated. Once a functional nucleoprotein complex is formed, each intermediate step in the recombination process often increases the stability of the complex, driving reactions toward completion. The process of target DNA selection is also regulated in certain genetic elements. Transposons move between sites that lack DNA homology, and some can select specific sites within the target DNA to insert into....


Mobile Element Transposase Gene Nucleoprotein Complex Recombinase Gene Target Immunity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access


  1. Barabas O, Ronning DR, Guynet C, Hickman AB, Ton-Hoang B, Chandler M, Dyda F (2008) Mechanism of IS200/IS605 family DNA transposases: activation and transposon-directed target site selection. Cell 132:208–220PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baranov PV, Fayet O, Hendrix RW, Atkins JF (2006) Recoding in bacteriophages and bacterial IS elements. Trends Genet 22:174–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bire S, Casteret S, Arnaoty A, Piegu B, Lecomte T, Bigot Y (2013) Transposase concentration controls transposition activity: myth or reality? Gene 530:165–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonen L, Vogel J (2001) The ins and outs of group II introns. Trends Genet 17:322–331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cambray G, Guerout AM, Mazel D (2010) Integrons. Annu Rev Genet 44:141–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Craig NL (1997) Target site selection in transposition. Annu Rev Biochem 66:437–474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grindley ND, Whiteson KL, Rice PA (2006) Mechanisms of site-specific recombination. Annu Rev Biochem 75:567–605PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gueguen E, Rousseau P, Duval-Valentin G, Chandler M (2005) The transpososome: control of transposition at the level of catalysis. Trends Microbiol 13:543–549PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kleckner N, Chalmers RM, Kwon D, Sakai J, Bolland S (1996) Tn10 and IS10 transposition and chromosome rearrangements: mechanism and regulation in vivo and in vitro. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 204:49–82PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lipkow K, Buisine N, Lampe DJ, Chalmers R (2004) Early intermediates of mariner transposition: catalysis without synapsis of the transposon ends suggests a novel architecture of the synaptic complex. Mol Cell Biol 24:8301–8311PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lohe AR, Timmons C, Beerman I, Lozovskaya ER, Hartl DL (2000) Self-inflicted wounds, template-directed gap repair and a recombination hotspot. Effects of the mariner transposase. Genetics 154:647–656PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Merkulov GV, Lawler JF Jr, Eby Y, Boeke JD (2001) Ty1 proteolytic cleavage sites are required for transposition: all sites are not created equal. J Virol 75:638–644PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nagy Z, Chandler M (2004) Regulation of transposition in bacteria. Res Microbiol 155:387–398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Peters JE, Craig NL (2001) Tn7: smarter than we thought. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2:806–814PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Reznikoff WS (1993) The Tn5 transposon. Annu Rev Microbiol 47:945–963PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Reznikoff WS (2003) Tn5 as a model for understanding DNA transposition. Mol Microbiol 47:1199–1206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Weinreich MD, Reznikoff WS (1992) Fis plays a role in Tn5 and IS50 transposition. J Bacteriol 174:4530–4537PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Molecular Control and Genetics Section, Gene Regulation and Chromosome Biology LaboratoryNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of HealthFrederickUSA
  2. 2.Department of MicrobiologyCornell UniversityIthacaUSA