Molecular Life Sciences

Living Edition
| Editors: Robert D. Wells, Judith S. Bond, Judith Klinman, Bettie Sue Siler Masters, Ellis Bell

Conservative Site-Specific Recombination

Living reference work entry



Conservative site-specific recombination is a process that enables genetic recombination between DNA molecules that contain short DNA sequences, which are bound by specific recombinase proteins. These recombinase proteins belong to one of two families of proteins, the tyrosine recombinases and the serine recombinases. Both recombinase families form covalent bonds between the enzyme and the DNA backbone. Following isomerization, the DNA backbone is rejoined in a process that does not require ATP or metal cofactors. The outcomes of site-specific recombination can include DNA integration, deletion, or inversion. Site-specific recombinases perform a variety of biological functions including integration of bacteriophage DNA into a host genome, resolution of dimer DNA molecules, recombination of antibiotic resistance gene cassettes, and alteration of gene expression. Site-specific recombinases are also actively used as tools in the biotech...


Gene Cassette Recombination Site Integrase Gene Synaptic Complex Tyrosine Recombinases 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access


  1. Boocock MR, Rice PA (2013) A proposed mechanism for IS607-family serine transposases. Mob DNA 4:24PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyd EF, Almagro-Moreno S, Parent MA (2009) Genomic islands are dynamic, ancient integrative elements in bacterial evolution. Trends Microbiol 17:47–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cambray G, Guerout AM, Mazel D (2010) Integrons. Annu Rev Genet 44:141–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cambray G, Sanchez-Alberola N, Campoy S, Guerin E, Da Re S, Gonzalez-Zorn B, Ploy MC, Barbe J, Mazel D, Erill I (2011) Prevalence of SOS-mediated control of integron integrase expression as an adaptive trait of chromosomal and mobile integrons. Mob DNA 2:6PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Craig NL (2002) Mobile DNA II. ASM Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  6. Ghosh K, Lau CK, Gupta K, Van Duyne GD (2005) Preferential synapsis of loxP sites drives ordered strand exchange in Cre-loxP site-specific recombination. Nat Chem Biol 1:275–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grindley ND, Whiteson KL, Rice PA (2006) Mechanisms of site-specific recombination. Annu Rev Biochem 75:567–605PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hacker J, Kaper JB (2000) Pathogenicity islands and the evolution of microbes. Annu Rev Microbiol 54:641–679PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ma CH, Rowley PA, Macieszak A, Guga P, Jayaram M (2009) Active site electrostatics protect genome integrity by blocking abortive hydrolysis during DNA recombination. EMBO J 28:1745–1756PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Tropp BE (2012) Molecular biology: genes to proteins, 4th edn. Jones & Bartlett Learning, SudburyGoogle Scholar
  11. Van Duyne GD, Rutherford K (2013) Large serine recombinase domain structure and attachment site binding. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 48:476–491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Yang W (2010) Topoisomerases and site-specific recombinases: similarities in structure and mechanism. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 45:520–534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Molecular Control and Genetics Section, Gene Regulation and Chromosome Biology LaboratoryNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of HealthFrederickUSA
  2. 2.Department of MicrobiologyCornell UniversityIthacaUSA