Molecular Life Sciences

Living Edition
| Editors: Robert D. Wells, Judith S. Bond, Judith Klinman, Bettie Sue Siler Masters, Ellis Bell


Living reference work entry


Transposons are mobile genetic elements that can move between different DNA molecules or within an individual DNA molecule. The donor and target DNA molecules do not require any sequence homology for mobilization to occur. Transposons are often characterized by the biochemical strategy used to carry out DNA breaking and joining reactions. Recombinase families include the DDE-, HUH-, DEDD-type and serine transposases. Transposons may be removed from a donor DNA entirely by being “cut out,” or they may be left in place while a copy of the element is “copied out.” During insertion, the element may be either “pasted in,” moved entirely into the recipient molecule, or they may be “copied in.” Transposons that are copied out as RNA are referred to as retrotransposons, whereas transposons that move exclusively as a DNA molecule and do not require an RNA intermediate are simply referred to as DNA transposons. The assembly and coordination of all of the components involved in...


Transposase Gene Nucleoprotein Complex Strand Cleavage Transposition Reaction Transposase Protein 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access


  1. Boocock MR, Rice PA (2013) A proposed mechanism for IS607-family serine transposases. Mob DNA 4:24PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Buchner JM, Robertson AE, Poynter DJ, Denniston SS, Karls AC (2005) Piv site-specific invertase requires a DEDD motif analogous to the catalytic center of the RuvC Holliday junction resolvases. J Bacteriol 187:3431–3437PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Chalmers RM, Kleckner N (1996) IS10/Tn10 transposition efficiently accommodates diverse transposon end configurations. EMBO J 15:5112–5122PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Chandler M, de la Cruz F, Dyda F, Hickman AB, Moncalian G, Ton-Hoang B (2013) Breaking and joining single-stranded DNA: the HUH endonuclease superfamily. Nat Rev Microbiol 11:525–538PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Craig NL (2002) Mobile DNA II. ASM Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  6. Curcio MJ, Derbyshire KM (2003) The outs and ins of transposition: from mu to kangaroo. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4:865–877PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Darmon E, Leach DR (2014) Bacterial genome instability. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 78:1–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dyda F, Chandler M, Hickman AB (2012) The emerging diversity of transpososome architectures. Q Rev Biophys 45:493–521PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gueguen E, Rousseau P, Duval-Valentin G, Chandler M (2005) The transpososome: control of transposition at the level of catalysis. Trends Microbiol 13:543–549PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lazarow K, Doll ML, Kunze R (2013) Molecular biology of maize Ac/Ds elements: an overview. Methods Mol Biol 1057:59–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McClintock B (1950) The origin and behavior of mutable loci in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 36:344–355Google Scholar
  12. Nagy Z, Chandler M (2004) Regulation of transposition in bacteria. Res Microbiol 155:387–398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Prosseda G, Latella MC, Casalino M, Nicoletti M, Michienzi S, Colonna B (2006) Plasticity of the P junc promoter of ISEc11, a new insertion sequence of the IS1111 family. J Bacteriol 188:4681–4689PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Reznikoff WS (1993) The Tn5 transposon. Annu Rev Microbiol 47:945–963PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Siguier P, Gourbeyre E, Chandler M (2014) Bacterial insertion sequences: their genomic impact and diversity. FEMS Microbiol Rev doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12067. [Epub ahead of print] 1–28Google Scholar
  16. Tropp BE (2012) Molecular biology: genes to proteins, 4th edn. Jones & Bartlett Learning, SudburyGoogle Scholar
  17. Turlan C, Chandler M (2000) Playing second fiddle: second-strand processing and liberation of transposable elements from donor DNA. Trends Microbiol 8:268–274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Molecular Control and Genetics Section, Gene Regulation and Chromosome Biology LaboratoryNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of HealthFrederickUSA
  2. 2.Department of MicrobiologyCornell UniversityIthacaUSA