Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hydrogen Production

Handbook of Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation

Abstract

Hydrogen (H2) is mainly used in chemical industry currently. In the near future, it will also become a significant fuel due to advantages of reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, enhanced energy security, and increased energy efficiency. To meet future demand, sufficient H2 production in an environmentally and economically benign manner is the major challenge. This chapter provides an overview of H2 production pathways from fossil hydrocarbons, renewable resources (mainly biomass), and water. And high-purity H2 production by the novel CO2 sorption-enhanced gasification is highlighted. The current research activities, recent breakthrough, and challenges of various H2 production technologies are all presented.

Fossil hydrocarbons account for 96 % of total H2 production in the world. Steam methane reforming, oil reforming, and coal gasification are the most common methods, and all technologies have been commercially available. However, H2 produced from fossil fuel is nonrenewable and results in significant CO2 emissions, which will limit its utilization.

H2 produced from biomass is renewable and CO2 neutral. Biomass thermochemical processes such as pyrolysis and gasification have been widely investigated and will probably be economically competitive with steam methane reforming. However, research on biomass biological processes such as photolysis, dark fermentation, photo-fermentation, etc., is in laboratory scale and the practical applications still need to be demonstrated.

H2 from water splitting is also attractive because water is widely available and very convenient to use. However, water splitting technologies, including electrolysis, thermolysis, and photoelectrolysis, are more expensive than using large-scale fuel-processing technologies and large improvement in system efficiency is necessary.

CO2 sorption-enhanced gasification is the core unit of zero emission systems. It has been thermodynamically and experimentally demonstrated to produce H2 with purity over 90 % from both fossil hydrocarbons and biomass. The major challenge is that the reactivity of CO2 sorbents decays through multi-calcination–carbonation cycles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abanades JC, Alvarez D (2003) Conversion limits in the reaction of CO2 with lime. Energy Fuel 17(2):308–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argun H, Kargi F (2011) Bio-hydrogen production by different operational modes of dark and photo-fermentation: an overview. Int J Hydrog Energy 36(13):7443–7459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arstad B, Prostak J, Blom R (2012) Continuous hydrogen production by sorption enhanced steam methane reforming (SE-SMR) in a circulating fluidized bed reactor: sorbent to catalyst ratio dependencies. Chem Eng J 189–190:413–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey R (2001) Projects in development Kentucky pioneer energy lima energy. Gasification Technologies

    Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramanian B et al (1999) Hydrogen from methane in a single-step process. Chem Eng Sci 54(15–16):3543–3552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barelli L et al (2008) Hydrogen production through sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming and membrane technology: a review. Energy 33(4):554–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker R (1974) The reactivity of calcium oxide towards carbon dioxide and its use for energy storage. J Appl Chem Biotech 24(4–5):221–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benemann JR (1998) Process analysis and economics of biophotolysis of water. IEA Hydrogen Program, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Brun-Tsekhovoi A et al (1988) The process of catalytic steam-reforming of hydrocarbons in the presence of carbon dioxide acceptor. In: Hydrogen energy progress VII, Proceedings of the 7th world hydrogen energy conference

    Google Scholar 

  • Calzavara Y et al (2005) Evaluation of biomass gasification in supercritical water process for hydrogen production. Energy Convers Manag 46(4):615–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collot A-G (2006) Matching gasification technologies to coal properties. Int J Coal Geol 65(3–4):191–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado J, Aznar MP, Corella J (1996) Calcined dolomite, magnesite, and calcite for cleaning hot gas from a fluidized bed biomass gasifier with steam: life and usefulness. Ind Eng Chem Res 35(10):3637–3643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirbas MF (2006) Hydrogen from various biomass species via pyrolysis and steam gasification processes. Energy Sources Part A 28(3):245–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Carlo A et al (2010) Numerical investigation of sorption enhanced steam methane reforming process using computational fluid dynamics eulerian–eulerian code. Ind Eng Chem Res 49(4):1561–1576

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ewan BCR, Allen RWK (2005) A figure of merit assessment of the routes to hydrogen. Int J Hydrog Energy 30(8):809–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan LS, Li FX, Ramkumar S (2008) Utilization of chemical looping strategy in coal gasification processes. Particuology 6(3):131–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fc D, Yf Y (2006) Hydrogen production and storage technologies. Chemical Industry Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez JR, Abanades JC, Murillo R (2012) Modeling of sorption enhanced steam methane reforming in an adiabatic fixed bed reactor. Chem Eng Sci 84:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florin NH, Harris AT (2008) Enhanced hydrogen production from biomass with in situ carbon dioxide capture using calcium oxide sorbents. Chem Eng Sci 63(2):287–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto S et al (2007) A kinetic study of in situ CO2 removal gasification of woody biomass for hydrogen production. Biomass Bioenergy 31(8):556–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funk JE (2001) Thermochemical hydrogen production: past and present. Int J Hydrog Energy 26(3):185–190

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gao L (2009) A study of the reaction chemistry in the production of hydrogen from coal using a novel process concept. Imperial College London

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia LA et al (2000) Catalytic steam reforming of bio-oils for the production of hydrogen: effects of catalyst composition. Appl Catal A Gen 201(2):225–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcıa-Ibañez P, Cabanillas A, Sánchez JM (2004) Gasification of leached orujillo (olive oil waste) in a pilot plant circulating fluidised bed reactor. Preliminary results. Biomass Bioenergy 27(2):183–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorin E, Retallick WB (1963) Method for the production of hydrogen. US Patents. p. 3,108,857

    Google Scholar 

  • Guan J et al (2007) Thermodynamic analysis of a biomass anaerobic gasification process for hydrogen production with sufficient CaO. Renew Energy 32(15):2502–2515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo Y, Fang W, Lin R (2005) Zhejiang daxue xuebao (gongxue ban). J Zhejiang Univ (Eng Sci) 39:538–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo LJ et al (2007) Hydrogen production by biomass gasification in supercritical water: a systematic experimental and analytical study. Catal Today 129(3–4):275–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo Y et al (2010) Review of catalytic supercritical water gasification for hydrogen production from biomass. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14(1):334–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallenbeck PC, Benemann JR (2002) Biological hydrogen production; fundamentals and limiting processes. Int J Hydrog Energy 27(11–12):1185–1193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han J, Kim H (2008) The reduction and control technology of tar during biomass gasification/pyrolysis: an overview. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 12(2):397–416

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Han L et al (2010) Influence of CaO additives on wheat-straw pyrolysis as determined by TG-FTIR analysis. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 88(2):199–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han L et al (2013) H2 rich gas production via pressurized fluidized bed gasification of sawdust with in situ CO2 capture. Appl Energy 109:36–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanaoka T et al (2005) Hydrogen production from woody biomass by steam gasification using a CO2 sorbent. Biomass Bioenergy 28(1):63–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison DP (2008) Sorption-enhanced hydrogen production: a review. Ind Eng Chem Res 47(17):6486–6501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holladay JD, Wang Y, Jones E (2004) Review of developments in portable hydrogen production using microreactor technology. Chem Rev 104(10):4767–4790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holladay JD et al (2009) An overview of hydrogen production technologies. Catal Today 139(4):244–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hufton J et al (2000) Sorption enhanced reaction process (SERP) for the production of hydrogen. In: Proceedings of the 2000 US DOE hydrogen program review

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes RW et al (2004) Improved long-term conversion of limestone-derived sorbents for in situ capture of CO2 in a fluidized bed combustor. Ind Eng Chem Res 43(18):5529–5539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hydrogen FC (2005) Infrastructure technologies program: multi-year research, development and demonstration plan. US Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen JP, Halmøy E (2009) Reactor modeling of sorption enhanced steam methane reforming. Energy Procedia 1(1):725–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen K (2007) Sorption enhanced steam methane reforming- reactor configurations and sorbent development. In: The third international workshop on in-situ CO2 removal

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen K et al (2006) Sorption-enhanced steam reforming of methane in a fluidized bed reactor with dolomite as -acceptor. Chem Eng Sci 61(4):1195–1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung GY et al (2002) Hydrogen production by a new chemoheterotrophic bacterium Citrobacter sp. Y19. Int J Hydrog Energy 27(6):601–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalinci Y, Hepbasli A, Dincer I (2009) Biomass-based hydrogen production: a review and analysis. Int J Hydrog Energy 34(21):8799–8817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerby RL, Ludden PW, Roberts GP (1995) Carbon monoxide-dependent growth of Rhodospirillum rubrum. J Bacteriol 177(8):2241–2244

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppatz S et al (2009) H2 rich product gas by steam gasification of biomass with in situ CO2 absorption in a dual fluidized bed system of 8 MW fuel input. Fuel Process Technol 90(7–8):914–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krummenacher JJ, West KN, Schmidt LD (2003) Catalytic partial oxidation of higher hydrocarbons at millisecond contact times: decane, hexadecane, and diesel fuel. J Catal 215(2):332–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar RV, Cole JA, Lyon RK (1999) Unmixed reforming: an advanced steam reforming process. In: Preprints of symposia, 218th. ACS national meeting

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuramoto K et al (2003) Repetitive carbonation–calcination reactions of Ca-based sorbents for efficient CO2 sorption at elevated temperatures and pressures. Ind Eng Chem Res 42(5):975–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin DB, Chahine R (2010) Challenges for renewable hydrogen production from biomass. Int J Hydrog Energy 35(10):4962–4969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z-S, Cai N-S (2007) Modeling of multiple cycles for sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming and sorbent regeneration in fixed bed reactor. Energy Fuel 21(5):2909–2918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Licht S (2005) Solar water splitting to generate hydrogen fuel – a photothermal electrochemical analysis. Int J Hydrog Energy 30(5):459–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin SY et al (2001) Hydrogen production from hydrocarbon by integration of water-carbon reaction and carbon dioxide removal (HyPr-RING method). Energy Fuel 15(2):339–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loo SV, Koppejan J (2008) The handbook of biomass combustion and co-firing. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahishi MR, Goswami DY (2007) An experimental study of hydrogen production by gasification of biomass in the presence of a sorbent. Int J Hydrog Energy 32(14):2803–2808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manovic V, Anthony EJ (2007) Steam reactivation of spent CaO-based sorbent for multiple CO2 capture cycles. Environ Sci Technol 41(4):1420–1425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markov SA et al (1997) Photoproduction of hydrogen by cyanobacteria under partial vacuum in batch culture or in a photobioreactor. Int J Hydrog Energy 22(5):521–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne TA, Abatzoglou N, Evans RJ (1998) Biomass gasifier“ tars”: their nature, formation, and conversion. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Minowa T, Zhen F, Ogi T (1998) Cellulose decomposition in hot-compressed water with alkali or nickel catalyst. J Supercrit Fluids 13(1–3):253–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mok WSL, Antal MJ (1992) Uncatalyzed solvolysis of whole biomass hemicellulose by hot compressed liquid water. Ind Eng Chem Res 31(4):1157–1161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nawaz M, Ruby J (2001) Zero emission coal alliance project conceptual design and economics. In: 26th international technical conference on coal utilization & fuel systems, (The Clearwater Conference)

    Google Scholar 

  • Norbeck JM et al (1996a) Hydrogen fuel for surface transportation, vol 160. SAE, Warrendale

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norbeck J et al (1996b) Hydrogen fuel for surface transportation. Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ochoa-Fernández E et al (2007) Process design simulation of H2 production by sorption enhanced steam methane reforming: evaluation of potential CO2 acceptors. Green Chem 9(6):654–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padró CEG, Putsche V (1999) Survey of the economics of hydrogen technologies. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeifer C, Puchner B, Hofbauer H (2009) Comparison of dual fluidized bed steam gasification of biomass with and without selective transport of CO2. Chem Eng Sci 64(23):5073–5083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qinhui W et al (2003) New near-zero emissions coal utilization technology with combined gasification and combustion. Power Eng 23(5):2711–2715

    Google Scholar 

  • Reijers HTJ et al (2009a) Modeling study of the sorption-enhanced reaction process for CO2 capture. I model development and validation. Ind Eng Chem Res 48(15):6966–6974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reijers HTJ et al (2009b) Modeling study of the sorption-enhanced reaction process for CO2 capture. II. Application to steam-methane reforming. Ind Eng Chem Res 48(15):6975–6982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resende FLP, Savage PE (2010) Effect of metals on supercritical water gasification of cellulose and lignin. Ind Eng Chem Res 49(6):2694–2700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizeq R, Lyon R, Zamansky V (2001) Fuel-flexible AGC technology for H2, power, and sequestration-ready CO2. In: The proceedings of the 26th international technical conference on coal utilization & fuel systems, Clearwater

    Google Scholar 

  • Rong N et al (2013) Steam hydration reactivation of CaO-based sorbent in cyclic carbonation/calcination for CO2 capture. Energy Fuel 27:5332

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostrup-Nielsen JR (1984) Catalytic steam reforming. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shafirovich E, Varma A (2009) Underground coal gasification: a brief review of current status. Ind Eng Chem Res 48(17):7865–7875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen Y, Yoshikawa K (2013) Recent progresses in catalytic tar elimination during biomass gasification or pyrolysis – a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 21:371–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simell PA et al (1997) Catalytic decomposition of gasification gas tar with benzene as the model compound. Ind Eng Chem Res 36(1):42–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solieman AAA et al (2009) Calcium oxide for CO2 capture: operational window and efficiency penalty in sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 3(4):393–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solsvik J, Jakobsen HA (2011) A numerical study of a two property catalyst/sorbent pellet design for the sorption-enhanced steam–methane reforming process: modeling complexity and parameter sensitivity study. Chem Eng J 178:407–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spritzer MH, Hong GT (2003) Supercritical water partial oxidation. In: Proceedings of the 2002 US DOE hydrogen program review. NREL/CP-570-30535

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton D, Kelleher B, Ross JRH (2001) Review of literature on catalysts for biomass gasification. Fuel Process Technol 73(3):155–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TeGrottehuis W, King D, Brooks K (2002) Optimizing microchannel reactors by trading-off equilibrium and reaction kinetics through temperature management. In: 6th international conference on microreaction technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Troshina O et al (2002) Production of H2 by the unicellular cyanobacterium Gloeocapsa alpicola CALU 743 during fermentation. Int J Hydrog Energy 27(11–12):1283–1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner J et al (2008) Renewable hydrogen production. Int J Energy Res 32(5):379–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ueno Y, Otsuka S, Morimoto M (1996) Hydrogen production from industrial wastewater by anaerobic microflora in chemostat culture. J Ferment Bioeng 82(2):194–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utgikar V, Thiesen T (2006) Life cycle assessment of high temperature electrolysis for hydrogen production via nuclear energy. Int J Hydrog Energy 31(7):939–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z et al (2006) Thermodynamic equilibrium analysis of hydrogen production by coal based on Coal/CaO/H2O gasification system. Int J Hydrog Energy 31(7):945–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Chao Z, Jakobsen H (2011) Numerical study of hydrogen production by the sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming process with online CO2 capture as operated in fluidized bed reactors. Clean Techn Environ Policy 13(4):559–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q et al (2014) Enhanced hydrogen-rich gas production from steam gasification of coal in a pressurized fluidized bed with CaO as a CO2 sorbent. Int J Hydrog Energy 39:5781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei LG et al (2008) Hydrogen production in steam gasification of biomass with CaO as a CO2 absorbent. Energy Fuel 22(3):1997–2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm DJ et al (2001) Syngas production for gas-to-liquids applications: technologies, issues and outlook. Fuel Process Technol 71(1–3):139–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams R (1933) Hydrogen production. US Patents. p. 1,938,20

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfrum EJ, et al (2003) Biological water gas shift development. DOE hydrogen, fuel cell, and infrastructure technologies program review

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu C et al (2010) Recent advances in catalysts for hot-gas removal of tar and NH3 from biomass gasification. Fuel 89(8):1784–1795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang H et al (2006) Pyrolysis of palm oil wastes for enhanced production of hydrogen rich gases. Fuel Process Technol 87(10):935–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeboah Y et al (2002) Hydrogen from biomass for urban transportation. In: Proceedings of the US DOE hydrogen program review

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu D, Aihara M, Antal MJ (1993) Hydrogen production by steam reforming glucose in supercritical water. Energy Fuel 7(5):574–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziock H-J, Lackner KS, Harrison DP (2001) Zero emission coal power, a new concept. In: Proceedings of the first national conference on carbon sequestration

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Thermal Power Engineering, Zhejiang University, Zheda Road 38, 310027, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

    Qinhui Wang

Authors
  1. Qinhui Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qinhui Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Mississippi Dept. Chemical Engineering, University, Mississippi, USA

    Wei-Yin Chen

  2. Advanced Manufacturing Research Inst. Functional Assembly Technology Group, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science & Technology (AIST), Nagoya, Japan

    Toshio Suzuki

  3. und Technische Biowissenschaften, TU Wien Inst. Verfahrenstechnik, Umwelttechnik, Wien, Austria

    Maximilian Lackner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Wang, Q. (2015). Hydrogen Production. In: Chen, WY., Suzuki, T., Lackner, M. (eds) Handbook of Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6431-0_29-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6431-0_29-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6431-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Chemistry and Mat. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Chemistry, Materials and Physics

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Hydrogen Production
    Published:
    04 May 2021

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6431-0_29-3

  2. Original

    Hydrogen Production
    Published:
    05 August 2015

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6431-0_29-2

Search

Navigation