Light–Shadow Interactions in Italian Medieval Churches
In the relationship between architecture and the sky, it is possible to identify three different design issues. The first regards the alignment of buildings with visible points on the horizon that coincide with the rising or setting of a celestial body (sun, planets, stars, or moon) on particular dates during the astronomical year (or liturgical year for sacred buildings). The second is the relationship between planimetric design and the design of the elevations. We are all familiar today with several “light effects”, which sometimes have almost hierophanic characteristics that, on certain days of the year, were used to engross, captivate, and amaze the spectator. Contrary to the first two issues, the third comes after the design and building stages and concerns the question of decorative elements. It is reasonable to believe that many years after the works were terminated, certain wall finishings were chosen over others, such as painted frescoes or statues. Whoever did this was fully aware, thanks to direct observation, that such decoration would be struck by a single ray of light on a specific day. This chapter examines light-shadow interactions in some Italian medieval churches.
KeywordsLight Effect Summer Solstice Entrance Door Decorative Element Julian Calendar
- Incerti M (2001) Solar geometry in Italian Cistercian architecture. Archeoastronomy: Journal of Astronomy in Culture 16:3–23Google Scholar
- Incerti M (2006) Architecture and the Universe. Representation as a study tool. Disegnare Idas Images 32:82–91Google Scholar
- Incerti M (2009) The room of the months of the Palace Schifanoia (Ferrara 1469–70). In: Rubiño-MartÚn JA, Belmonte JA, Prada F, Alberdi A (eds) Cosmology across cultures. ASP conference series 409, Astronomical Society of the Pacific, San Francisco, pp 220–227Google Scholar
- Incerti M (2010) The Baptistery of Parma, Italy. In: Ruggles CLN, Cotte M (eds) Heritage sites of astronomy and archaeoastronomy in the context of the UNESCO World Heritage Convention. ICOMOS–IAU, Paris, pp 180–184Google Scholar