The term “syncretism” has had different denotations and connotations over time. In current usage in anthropology and religious studies, it generally refers to a mixing of elements from different religious systems or traditions. From the perspective of many religious leaders, such a mixing is often viewed as a negative process, as an abandoning of true religion. From the perspective of many anthropologists, psychologists, and professionals of other academic disciplines, religious syncretism may assist in a positive acculturation process, whereby elements of different systems emerge in a new format allowing an integration of ideas and behaviors. It is important to bear in mind that whatever example of syncretism is in focus, it always takes place in a psychocultural and sociopolitical context, and therefore, the psychological effects of such need to include those levels of analysis. Though a central historical concept, globalization as well as the challenges of voluntary and forced...
Bibliography
Bastide, R. (1978). The African religions of Brazil, toward a sociology of the interpenetration of civilizations. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bauman, Z. (1998). Postmodern religion? In P. Heelas (Ed.), Religion, modernity and postmodernity. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Bayly, S. (1989). Saints, Goddesses, and kings: Muslims and Christians in South Indian society, 1700–1900. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Burger, H. (1966). Syncretism: An acculturative accelerator. Human Organization, 25(2), 103–115.
DeMarinis, V. (2003). Pastoral care, existential health and existential epidemiology: A Swedish postmodern case study. Stockholm: Verbum Press.
Droogers, A. (1989). Syncretism: The problem of definition, the definition of the problem. In J. D. Gort, H. M. Vroom, R. Fernhout, & A. Wessels (Eds.), Dialogue and syncretism, an interdisciplinary approach. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans & Rodopi.
Greenfield, S., & Droogers, A. (Eds.). (2001). Reinventing religions: Syncretism and transformation in Africa and the Americas. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Hayden, R. (2002). Antagonistic tolerance: Competitive sharing of religious sites in South Asia and the Balkins. Current Anthropology, 43, 205–231.
Inglehart, R. (1996). Globalization and postmodern values. The Washington Quarterly, 23, 215–228.
Marsella, A., & Yamada, A. (2000). Culture and mental health: An introduction and overview of foundations, concepts and issues. In I. Cúellar & F. A. Paniagua (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural health: Assessment and treatment of diverse populations. San Diego: Academic.
Shaw, R., & Stewart, C. (1994). Introduction: Problematizing syncretism. In S. Stewart & R. Shaw (Eds.), Syncretism/anti-syncretism, the politics of religious synthesis. London: Routledge.
Van der Veer, P. (1994). Syncretism, multiculturalism and the discourse of tolerance. In S. Stewart & R. Shaw (Eds.), Syncretism/anti-syncretism, the politics of religious synthesis. London: Routledge.
Werbner, R. (1994). Afterward. In S. Stewart & R. Shaw (Eds.), Syncretism/anti-syncretism, the politics of religious synthesis. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this entry
Cite this entry
DeMarinis, V. (2014). Syncretism. In: Leeming, D.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6086-2_679
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6086-2_679
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6085-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6086-2
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science