Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Transportation Technologies for Sustainability pp 422–437Cite as

Driving Under Reduced Visibility Conditions for Older Adults

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:

  • 2475 Accesses

Definition of the Subject and Its Importance

An important and consistent finding regarding driving safety is that accident risk increases for older driver populations [1–3]. Evans [2] systematically examined data from the FARS (Fatality Analysis Reporting System) and found steady increases in accident fatalities and rate of severe crashes for older drivers who were older than 60. This increased accident rate occurred for both men and women and was independent of miles driven.

For many people, driving gives us a sense of independence. This becomes even more important for older population to maintain the quality of life. Unfortunately, natural age-related functional deteriorations cause decreased driving performance and increased crash risks. There are an increasing number of older adults on the road today compared to 10 years ago [4], and the older driver population will continue to increase in the next few decades. Thus, it is important to understand older adults’ driving behaviors...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   749.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

Contrast sensitivity:

The ability to distinguish different levels of luminance for a given display.

Bibliography

  1. Langford J, Koppel S (2006) Epidemiology of older driver crashes – identifying older driver risk factors and exposure patterns. Transp Res F Traffic Psychol Behav 9:309–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Evans L (2004) Traffic safety. Science Serving Society, Bloomfield Hills, p 179

    Google Scholar 

  3. Owsley C, Ball K, Sloane ME, Roenker DL, Bruni JR (1991) Visual/cognitive correlates of vehicle accidents in older drivers. Psychol Aging 6:403–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2008) Traffic safety fact – 2007 data (NHTSA’s national center for statistics and analysis. Publication No.DOT HS 810 992). Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  5. Owsley C, McGwin G Jr, Phillips JM, McNeal SF, Stalvey BT (2004) Impact of an educational program on the safety of high-risk, visually impaired, older drivers. Am J Prev Med 26:222–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wood JM, Owens DA (2005) Standard measures of visual acuity do not predict drivers’ recognition performance under day or night conditions. Optom Vis Sci 82:698–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ball K, Owsley C, Beard B (1990) Clinical visual perimetry underestimates peripheral field problems in older adults. Clin Vis Sci 5:113–125

    Google Scholar 

  8. McGwin G, Chapman V, Owsley C (2000) Visual risk factors for driving difficulty among older driver. Accid Anal Prev 32(6):735–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Glass JM (2007) Visual function and cognitive aging: differential role of contrast sensitivity in verbal versus spatial tasks. Psychol Aging 22:233–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schachar RA (2006) Effect of change in central lens thickness and lens shape on age-related decline in accommodation. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:1897–1898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Richards OW (1977) Effects of luminance and contrast on visual acuity, ages 16 to 90 years. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 54:178–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Derefeldt G, Lennerstrand G, Lundh B (1979) Age variations in normal human contrast sensitivity. Acta Ophthalmol 57:679–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Owsley C, Sekuer R, Siemsen D (1983) Contrast sensitivity throughout adulthood. Vis Res 23:689–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McFarland RA, Domey RG, Warren AB, Ward DC (1960) Dark adaptation as a function of age: I. A statistical analysis. J Gerontol 15:149–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Domey RG, McFarland RA, Chadwick E (1960) Dark adaptation as a function of age and time. II. A derivation. J Gerontol 15:267–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chapanis A (1950) Relationships between age, visual acuity and color vision. Hum Biol 22:1–33

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kahn HA, Leibowitz HM, Ganley JP, Kini MM, Colton T, Nickerson RS et al (1977) The Framingham Eye Study I. Outline and major prevalence findings. Am J Epidemiol 106:17–32

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sekuler R, Hutman LP, Owsley CJ (1980) Human aging and spatial vision. Science 209:1255–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Long GM, Crambert RF (1990) The nature and basis of age-related changes in dynamic visual acuity. Psychol Aging 5:138–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Trick GL, Silverman SE (1991) Visual sensitivity to motion: age-related changes and deficits in senile dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neurology 41:1437–1440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gilmore GC, Wenk HE, Naylor LA, Stuve TA (1992) Motion perception and aging. Psychol Aging 7:654–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Andersen GJ, Atchley P (1995) Age-related differences in the detection of three dimensional surfaces from optic flow. Psychol Aging 10:650–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Betts LR, Taylor CP, Sekuler AB, Bennett PJ (2005) Aging reduces center-surround antagonism in visual motion processing. Neuron 45:361–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bennett PJ, Sekuler R, Sekuler AB (2007) The effects of aging on motion detection and direction identification. Vis Res 47:799–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Andersen GJ, Cisneros J, Atchley P, Saidpour A (1999) Speed, size, and edge-rate information for the detection of collision events. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25:256–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Andersen GJ, Enriquez A (2006) Aging and the detection of observer and moving object collisions. Psychol Aging 21:74–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Norman FJ, Clayton AM, Shular CF, Thompson SR (2004) Aging and the perception of depth and shape from motion parallax. Psychol Aging 19:506–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Norman FJ, Crabtree CE, Hermann D (2006) Aging and the perception of 3-D shape from kinetic patterns of binocular disparity. Percept Psychophys 68:94–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Folk CL, Hoyer WJ (1992) Aging and shifts of visual spatial attention. Psychol Aging 7:453–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kramer AF, Hahn S, Irwin DE, Theeuwes J (1999) Attentional capture and aging: Implications for visual search performance and oculomotor control. Psychol Aging 14:135–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hartley AA, Little DM (1999) Age-related differences and similarities in dual-task interference. J Exp Psychol 128:416–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Scialfa CT, Thomas DM, Joffe KM (1994) Age differences in the useful field of view: An eye movement analysis. Optom Vis Sci 71:736–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sekuler AB, Bennett PJ, Mamelak M (2000) Effects of aging on the useful field of view. Exp Aging Res 26:103–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Owsley C, Sloane ME (1990) Vision and aging. In: Nebes RD, Corkin S (eds) Handbook of neuropsychology, vol 4. Elsevier Science, New York, pp 229–249

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hoffman L, McDowd JM, Atchely P, Dubinsky R (2005) The role of visual attention in predicting driving impairment in older adults. Psychol Aging 20:610–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Salthouse TA, Somberg BL (1982) Time-accuracy relationships in young and old adults. J Gerontol 37:49–53

    Google Scholar 

  37. Salthouse TA, Somberg BL (1982) Isolating the age deficit in speeded performance. J Gerontol 37:59–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Michon JA (1989) Explanatory pitfalls and rule-based driver models. Accid Anal Prev 21(4):341–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Cutting JE (1996) Wayfinding from multiple sources of local information in retinal flow. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 22(5):1299–1313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wilkniss SM, Jones MG, Korol DL, Gold PE, Manning CA (1997) Age-related differences in an ecologically based study of route learning. Psychol Aging 12(2):372–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. DeLucia PR, Mather RD (2006) Motion extrapolation of car-following scenes in younger and older drivers. J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 48(4):666–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Macuga KL, Beall AC, Kelly JW, Smith RS, Loomis JM (2007) Changing lanes: inertial cues and explicit path information facilitate steering performance when visual feedback is removed. Exp Brain Res 178:141–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Chandler RE, Herman R, Montroll EW (1958) Traffic dynamics: studies in car following. Oper Res 6:165–184

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. Brackstone M, McDonald M (1999) Car-following: a historical review. Transp Res Rec F 2:181–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Andersen GJ, Sauer CW (2007) Optical information for car following: the driving by visual angle (DVA) model. Hum Factors 49:878–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Andersen GJ, Sauer CW (2005) Visual information for car following by drivers: the role of scene information. Transp Res Rec F 1899:104–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Ni R, Kang J, Andersen GJ (2010) Age-related declines in car following performance under simulated fog conditions. Accid Anal Prev 42(3):818–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Bian Z, Andersen GJ (2008) Aging and the perceptual organization of 3-D scenes. Psychol Aging 23:342–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Scialfa CT, Guzy LT, Leibowitz HW, Garvey PM et al (1991) Age differences in estimating vehicle velocity. Psychol Aging 6(1):60–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Massie DL, Campbell KL, Williams AF (1995) Traffic accident involvement rates by driver age and gender. Accid Anal Prev 27:73–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Stutts JC, Martell C (1992) Older driver population and crash involvement trends 1974–1988. Accid Anal Prev 24:317–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. McGwin G, Brown DB (1999) Characteristics of traffic crashes among young, middle-aged and older drivers. Accid Anal Prev 31:181–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Kang JJ, Ni R, Andersen GJ (2008) The effects of reduced visibility from fog on car following performance. J Transp Res Board 2069:9–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Broughton KLM, Switzer F, Scott D (2007) Car following decisions under three visibility conditions and two speeds tested with a driving simulator. Accid Anal Prev 39:106–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Andersen GJ, Braunstein ML (1998) The perception of depth and slant from texture in 3D scenes. Perception 27:1087–1106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Larish JF, Flach JM (1990) Sources of information useful for perception of speed of rectilinear motion. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 16:295–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Andersen GJ, Cisneros J, Saidpour A, Atchley P (2000) Age-related differences in collision detection during deceleration. Psychol Aging 15:241–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Andersen GJ, Sauer CW (2004) Optical information for collision detection during deceleration. In: Hecht H, Kaiser M (eds) Theories of time to contact, advances in psychology series, North Holland. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 93–108

    Google Scholar 

  59. DeLucia PR, Bleckley MK, Meyer LE, Bush JM (2003) Judgments about collisions in younger and older drivers. Transp Res part F Traffic Psychol Behav 6:63–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Al-Ghamdi AS (2007) Experimental evaluation of fog warning system. Accid Anal Prev 39:1065–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Bian Z, Ni R, Guindon A, Andersen GJ (2009) Aging and the detection of collision events in fog. In: Proceedings of the fifth international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training and vehicle design, pp 69–75

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ni R, Andersen GJ (2008) Detection of collision events on curved trajectories. Percept Psychophys 70(7):1314–1324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Green DM, Swets JA (1966) Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  64. Pelli DG, Robson JG, Wilkins AJ (1988) Designing a new letter chart for measuring contrast sensitivity. Clin Vis Neurosci 2:187–199

    Google Scholar 

  65. Braunstein ML, Andersen GJ, Rouse MW, Tittle JS (1986) Recovering viewer-centered depth from disparity, occlusion, and velocity gradients. Percept Psychophys 40:216–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Gibson T (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  67. Gibson T (1966) The senses considered as perceptual systems. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  68. Warren WH, Morris M, Kalish M (1988) Perception of translational heading from optical flow. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 14:646–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Warren WH, Mestre DR, Blackwell AW, Morris MW (1991) Perception of circular heading from optical flow. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 17:28–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Andersen GJ, Braunstein ML (1985) Induced self-motion in central vision. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 11:122–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Nguyen B, Zhuo Y, Ni R (2011) Aging and the steering control under reduced visibility conditions. In: Proceedings of the sixth international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training and vehicle design (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Andersen GJ, Ni R (2008) Aging and visual processing: declines in spatial not temporal integration. Vis Res 48:109–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Ni R, Andersen GJ, Rizzo M (2005) Age related decrements in steering control: the effects of landmark and optical flow information. In: Proceedings of the third international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training and vehicle design, pp 144–150

    Google Scholar 

  74. Ni R, Bian Z, Andersen GJ (2009) Age-related differences in using optical flow and landmark information for steering control. In: Proceedings of the IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium, 2009, pp 691–694

    Google Scholar 

  75. Ni R, Andersen GJ (2006) Age related performance in driving: steering and collision detection, vision in vehicles 11. Dublin, Ireland

    Google Scholar 

  76. Barlow HB (1953) Summation and inhibition in the frog's retina. J Physiol 119:69–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Brown HA, Allison DD, Samonds JM, Bonds AB (2003) Nonlocal origin of response suppression from stimulation outside the classical receptive field in area 17 of the cat. Vis Neurosci 20:85–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Das A, Gilbert CD (1999) Topography of contectural modulations mediated by short-range interactions in primary visual cortex. Nature 399:655–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Stettler DD, Das A, Bennett J, Gilbert CD (2000) Lateral connectivity and contextual interactions in macaque primary visual cortex. Neuron 36:739–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Bullier J, Hupe JM, James AC, Girard P (2001) The role of feedback connections in shaping the responses of visual cortical neurons. Prog Brain Res 134:193–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Moore T, Armstrong KM (2003) Selective gating of visual signals by microstimulation of frontal cortex. Nature 421:370–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Roberts MJ, Zinke W, Guio K, Robertson R, McDonald JS, Thiele A (2005) Acetylcholine kinetically controls spatial integration in Marmoset primary visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 93:2062–2072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Ledgeway T, Hess RF (2002) Rules for combining the outputs of local motion detectors to define simple contours. Vis Res 42:653–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Field DJ, Hayes A, Hess RF (1993) Contour integration by the human visual system: evidence for a local ‘association field’. Vis Res 33:173–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Kovacs I (1996) Gestalten of today: early processing of visual contours and surfaces. Behav Brain Res 82:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Aspell JE, Wattam-Bell J, Braddick O (2006) Interaction of spatial and temporal integration in global form processing. Vis Res 46:2834–2841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Bair W, Movshon JA (2004) Adaptive temporal integration in direction-selection neurons in Macaque visual cortex. J Neurosci 24:7305–7323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Shadlen MN, Movshon JA (1999) Synchrony unbound: a critical evaluation of the temporal binding hypothesis. Neuron 24:67–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Baker CL, Braddick OJ (1985) Temporal properties of the short-range process in apparent motion. Perception 14:181–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Andersen GJ, Cortese JM (1989) 2-D contour perception resulting from kinetic occlusion. Percept Psychophysic 46:49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Kellman PJ, Shipley TF (1992) Perceiving objects across gaps in space and time. Curr Dir Cogn Sci 1:193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Lee S-H, Blake R (1999) Visual form created solely from temporal structure. Science 284:1165–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Blake R, Lee S-H (2005) The role of temporal structure in human vision. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev 4:21–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Thorton WJL, Raz N (2006) Aging and the role of working memory resources in visuospatial attention. Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 13:36–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Greenwood PM, Parasuraman R (2004) The scaling in visual search and its modification in healthy aging. Percept Psychophys 66:3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Andersen GJ, Ni R, Bower JD, Watanabe T (2010) Perceptual learning, aging, and improved visual performance in early stages of visual processing. J Vis 10(13):4, 1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Richards E, Bennett PJ, Sekuler AB (2006) Age related differences in learning with the useful field of view. Vis Res 46:4217–4231

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS, 67260, USA

    Dr. Rui Ni

Authors
  1. Dr. Rui Ni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rui Ni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA

    Mehrdad Ehsani

  2. Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Fei-Yue Wang

  3. Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA

    Gary L. Brosch

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Ni, R. (2013). Driving Under Reduced Visibility Conditions for Older Adults . In: Ehsani, M., Wang, FY., Brosch, G.L. (eds) Transportation Technologies for Sustainability. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5844-9_476

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation