Transportation Technologies for Sustainability

2013 Edition
| Editors: Mehrdad Ehsani, Fei-Yue Wang, Gary L. Brosch

Driving Under Reduced Visibility Conditions for Older Adults

Reference work entry

Definition of the Subject and Its Importance

An important and consistent finding regarding driving safety is that accident risk increases for older driver populations [1, 2, 3]. Evans [2] systematically examined data from the FARS (Fatality Analysis Reporting System) and found steady increases in accident fatalities and rate of severe crashes for older drivers who were older than 60. This increased accident rate occurred for both men and women and was independent of miles driven.

For many people, driving gives us a sense of independence. This becomes even more important for older population to maintain the quality of life. Unfortunately, natural age-related functional deteriorations cause decreased driving performance and increased crash risks. There are an increasing number of older adults on the road today compared to 10 years ago [4], and the older driver population will continue to increase in the next few decades. Thus, it is important to understand older adults’ driving...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. 1.
    Langford J, Koppel S (2006) Epidemiology of older driver crashes – identifying older driver risk factors and exposure patterns. Transp Res F Traffic Psychol Behav 9:309–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Evans L (2004) Traffic safety. Science Serving Society, Bloomfield Hills, p 179Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Owsley C, Ball K, Sloane ME, Roenker DL, Bruni JR (1991) Visual/cognitive correlates of vehicle accidents in older drivers. Psychol Aging 6:403–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2008) Traffic safety fact – 2007 data (NHTSA’s national center for statistics and analysis. Publication No.DOT HS 810 992). Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Owsley C, McGwin G Jr, Phillips JM, McNeal SF, Stalvey BT (2004) Impact of an educational program on the safety of high-risk, visually impaired, older drivers. Am J Prev Med 26:222–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wood JM, Owens DA (2005) Standard measures of visual acuity do not predict drivers’ recognition performance under day or night conditions. Optom Vis Sci 82:698–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ball K, Owsley C, Beard B (1990) Clinical visual perimetry underestimates peripheral field problems in older adults. Clin Vis Sci 5:113–125Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McGwin G, Chapman V, Owsley C (2000) Visual risk factors for driving difficulty among older driver. Accid Anal Prev 32(6):735–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Glass JM (2007) Visual function and cognitive aging: differential role of contrast sensitivity in verbal versus spatial tasks. Psychol Aging 22:233–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schachar RA (2006) Effect of change in central lens thickness and lens shape on age-related decline in accommodation. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:1897–1898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Richards OW (1977) Effects of luminance and contrast on visual acuity, ages 16 to 90 years. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 54:178–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Derefeldt G, Lennerstrand G, Lundh B (1979) Age variations in normal human contrast sensitivity. Acta Ophthalmol 57:679–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Owsley C, Sekuer R, Siemsen D (1983) Contrast sensitivity throughout adulthood. Vis Res 23:689–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McFarland RA, Domey RG, Warren AB, Ward DC (1960) Dark adaptation as a function of age: I. A statistical analysis. J Gerontol 15:149–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Domey RG, McFarland RA, Chadwick E (1960) Dark adaptation as a function of age and time. II. A derivation. J Gerontol 15:267–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chapanis A (1950) Relationships between age, visual acuity and color vision. Hum Biol 22:1–33Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kahn HA, Leibowitz HM, Ganley JP, Kini MM, Colton T, Nickerson RS et al (1977) The Framingham Eye Study I. Outline and major prevalence findings. Am J Epidemiol 106:17–32Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sekuler R, Hutman LP, Owsley CJ (1980) Human aging and spatial vision. Science 209:1255–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Long GM, Crambert RF (1990) The nature and basis of age-related changes in dynamic visual acuity. Psychol Aging 5:138–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Trick GL, Silverman SE (1991) Visual sensitivity to motion: age-related changes and deficits in senile dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neurology 41:1437–1440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gilmore GC, Wenk HE, Naylor LA, Stuve TA (1992) Motion perception and aging. Psychol Aging 7:654–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Andersen GJ, Atchley P (1995) Age-related differences in the detection of three dimensional surfaces from optic flow. Psychol Aging 10:650–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Betts LR, Taylor CP, Sekuler AB, Bennett PJ (2005) Aging reduces center-surround antagonism in visual motion processing. Neuron 45:361–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bennett PJ, Sekuler R, Sekuler AB (2007) The effects of aging on motion detection and direction identification. Vis Res 47:799–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Andersen GJ, Cisneros J, Atchley P, Saidpour A (1999) Speed, size, and edge-rate information for the detection of collision events. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25:256–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Andersen GJ, Enriquez A (2006) Aging and the detection of observer and moving object collisions. Psychol Aging 21:74–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Norman FJ, Clayton AM, Shular CF, Thompson SR (2004) Aging and the perception of depth and shape from motion parallax. Psychol Aging 19:506–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Norman FJ, Crabtree CE, Hermann D (2006) Aging and the perception of 3-D shape from kinetic patterns of binocular disparity. Percept Psychophys 68:94–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Folk CL, Hoyer WJ (1992) Aging and shifts of visual spatial attention. Psychol Aging 7:453–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kramer AF, Hahn S, Irwin DE, Theeuwes J (1999) Attentional capture and aging: Implications for visual search performance and oculomotor control. Psychol Aging 14:135–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hartley AA, Little DM (1999) Age-related differences and similarities in dual-task interference. J Exp Psychol 128:416–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Scialfa CT, Thomas DM, Joffe KM (1994) Age differences in the useful field of view: An eye movement analysis. Optom Vis Sci 71:736–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sekuler AB, Bennett PJ, Mamelak M (2000) Effects of aging on the useful field of view. Exp Aging Res 26:103–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Owsley C, Sloane ME (1990) Vision and aging. In: Nebes RD, Corkin S (eds) Handbook of neuropsychology, vol 4. Elsevier Science, New York, pp 229–249Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hoffman L, McDowd JM, Atchely P, Dubinsky R (2005) The role of visual attention in predicting driving impairment in older adults. Psychol Aging 20:610–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Salthouse TA, Somberg BL (1982) Time-accuracy relationships in young and old adults. J Gerontol 37:49–53Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Salthouse TA, Somberg BL (1982) Isolating the age deficit in speeded performance. J Gerontol 37:59–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Michon JA (1989) Explanatory pitfalls and rule-based driver models. Accid Anal Prev 21(4):341–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cutting JE (1996) Wayfinding from multiple sources of local information in retinal flow. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 22(5):1299–1313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wilkniss SM, Jones MG, Korol DL, Gold PE, Manning CA (1997) Age-related differences in an ecologically based study of route learning. Psychol Aging 12(2):372–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    DeLucia PR, Mather RD (2006) Motion extrapolation of car-following scenes in younger and older drivers. J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 48(4):666–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Macuga KL, Beall AC, Kelly JW, Smith RS, Loomis JM (2007) Changing lanes: inertial cues and explicit path information facilitate steering performance when visual feedback is removed. Exp Brain Res 178:141–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Chandler RE, Herman R, Montroll EW (1958) Traffic dynamics: studies in car following. Oper Res 6:165–184MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Brackstone M, McDonald M (1999) Car-following: a historical review. Transp Res Rec F 2:181–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Andersen GJ, Sauer CW (2007) Optical information for car following: the driving by visual angle (DVA) model. Hum Factors 49:878–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Andersen GJ, Sauer CW (2005) Visual information for car following by drivers: the role of scene information. Transp Res Rec F 1899:104–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ni R, Kang J, Andersen GJ (2010) Age-related declines in car following performance under simulated fog conditions. Accid Anal Prev 42(3):818–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bian Z, Andersen GJ (2008) Aging and the perceptual organization of 3-D scenes. Psychol Aging 23:342–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Scialfa CT, Guzy LT, Leibowitz HW, Garvey PM et al (1991) Age differences in estimating vehicle velocity. Psychol Aging 6(1):60–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Massie DL, Campbell KL, Williams AF (1995) Traffic accident involvement rates by driver age and gender. Accid Anal Prev 27:73–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Stutts JC, Martell C (1992) Older driver population and crash involvement trends 1974–1988. Accid Anal Prev 24:317–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    McGwin G, Brown DB (1999) Characteristics of traffic crashes among young, middle-aged and older drivers. Accid Anal Prev 31:181–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kang JJ, Ni R, Andersen GJ (2008) The effects of reduced visibility from fog on car following performance. J Transp Res Board 2069:9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Broughton KLM, Switzer F, Scott D (2007) Car following decisions under three visibility conditions and two speeds tested with a driving simulator. Accid Anal Prev 39:106–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Andersen GJ, Braunstein ML (1998) The perception of depth and slant from texture in 3D scenes. Perception 27:1087–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Larish JF, Flach JM (1990) Sources of information useful for perception of speed of rectilinear motion. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 16:295–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Andersen GJ, Cisneros J, Saidpour A, Atchley P (2000) Age-related differences in collision detection during deceleration. Psychol Aging 15:241–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Andersen GJ, Sauer CW (2004) Optical information for collision detection during deceleration. In: Hecht H, Kaiser M (eds) Theories of time to contact, advances in psychology series, North Holland. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 93–108Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    DeLucia PR, Bleckley MK, Meyer LE, Bush JM (2003) Judgments about collisions in younger and older drivers. Transp Res part F Traffic Psychol Behav 6:63–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Al-Ghamdi AS (2007) Experimental evaluation of fog warning system. Accid Anal Prev 39:1065–1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Bian Z, Ni R, Guindon A, Andersen GJ (2009) Aging and the detection of collision events in fog. In: Proceedings of the fifth international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training and vehicle design, pp 69–75Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Ni R, Andersen GJ (2008) Detection of collision events on curved trajectories. Percept Psychophys 70(7):1314–1324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Green DM, Swets JA (1966) Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Pelli DG, Robson JG, Wilkins AJ (1988) Designing a new letter chart for measuring contrast sensitivity. Clin Vis Neurosci 2:187–199Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Braunstein ML, Andersen GJ, Rouse MW, Tittle JS (1986) Recovering viewer-centered depth from disparity, occlusion, and velocity gradients. Percept Psychophys 40:216–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Gibson T (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Gibson T (1966) The senses considered as perceptual systems. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Warren WH, Morris M, Kalish M (1988) Perception of translational heading from optical flow. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 14:646–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Warren WH, Mestre DR, Blackwell AW, Morris MW (1991) Perception of circular heading from optical flow. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 17:28–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Andersen GJ, Braunstein ML (1985) Induced self-motion in central vision. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 11:122–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Nguyen B, Zhuo Y, Ni R (2011) Aging and the steering control under reduced visibility conditions. In: Proceedings of the sixth international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training and vehicle design (in press)Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Andersen GJ, Ni R (2008) Aging and visual processing: declines in spatial not temporal integration. Vis Res 48:109–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Ni R, Andersen GJ, Rizzo M (2005) Age related decrements in steering control: the effects of landmark and optical flow information. In: Proceedings of the third international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training and vehicle design, pp 144–150Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Ni R, Bian Z, Andersen GJ (2009) Age-related differences in using optical flow and landmark information for steering control. In: Proceedings of the IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium, 2009, pp 691–694Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Ni R, Andersen GJ (2006) Age related performance in driving: steering and collision detection, vision in vehicles 11. Dublin, IrelandGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Barlow HB (1953) Summation and inhibition in the frog's retina. J Physiol 119:69–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Brown HA, Allison DD, Samonds JM, Bonds AB (2003) Nonlocal origin of response suppression from stimulation outside the classical receptive field in area 17 of the cat. Vis Neurosci 20:85–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Das A, Gilbert CD (1999) Topography of contectural modulations mediated by short-range interactions in primary visual cortex. Nature 399:655–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Stettler DD, Das A, Bennett J, Gilbert CD (2000) Lateral connectivity and contextual interactions in macaque primary visual cortex. Neuron 36:739–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Bullier J, Hupe JM, James AC, Girard P (2001) The role of feedback connections in shaping the responses of visual cortical neurons. Prog Brain Res 134:193–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Moore T, Armstrong KM (2003) Selective gating of visual signals by microstimulation of frontal cortex. Nature 421:370–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Roberts MJ, Zinke W, Guio K, Robertson R, McDonald JS, Thiele A (2005) Acetylcholine kinetically controls spatial integration in Marmoset primary visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 93:2062–2072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Ledgeway T, Hess RF (2002) Rules for combining the outputs of local motion detectors to define simple contours. Vis Res 42:653–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Field DJ, Hayes A, Hess RF (1993) Contour integration by the human visual system: evidence for a local ‘association field’. Vis Res 33:173–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Kovacs I (1996) Gestalten of today: early processing of visual contours and surfaces. Behav Brain Res 82:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Aspell JE, Wattam-Bell J, Braddick O (2006) Interaction of spatial and temporal integration in global form processing. Vis Res 46:2834–2841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Bair W, Movshon JA (2004) Adaptive temporal integration in direction-selection neurons in Macaque visual cortex. J Neurosci 24:7305–7323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Shadlen MN, Movshon JA (1999) Synchrony unbound: a critical evaluation of the temporal binding hypothesis. Neuron 24:67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Baker CL, Braddick OJ (1985) Temporal properties of the short-range process in apparent motion. Perception 14:181–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Andersen GJ, Cortese JM (1989) 2-D contour perception resulting from kinetic occlusion. Percept Psychophysic 46:49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Kellman PJ, Shipley TF (1992) Perceiving objects across gaps in space and time. Curr Dir Cogn Sci 1:193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Lee S-H, Blake R (1999) Visual form created solely from temporal structure. Science 284:1165–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Blake R, Lee S-H (2005) The role of temporal structure in human vision. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev 4:21–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Thorton WJL, Raz N (2006) Aging and the role of working memory resources in visuospatial attention. Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 13:36–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Greenwood PM, Parasuraman R (2004) The scaling in visual search and its modification in healthy aging. Percept Psychophys 66:3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Andersen GJ, Ni R, Bower JD, Watanabe T (2010) Perceptual learning, aging, and improved visual performance in early stages of visual processing. J Vis 10(13):4, 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Richards E, Bennett PJ, Sekuler AB (2006) Age related differences in learning with the useful field of view. Vis Res 46:4217–4231CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWichita State UniversityWichitaUSA