Skip to main content

US Responses to Terrorists

Overview

America’s response to terrorism has changed dramatically over the past 30 years. Changes have included everything from the way in which terrorism is portrayed politically to the manner in which terrorists are investigated, prosecuted, and punished. Modifications to governmental interventions also have affected the manner in which terrorists plan and conduct terrorist activities as well as the manner in which they defend themselves in court. Although it would be difficult to address all of these changes in a single paper, the purpose of this current entry is to provide an overview of the most significant events that evoked changes in the manner in which terrorists are portrayed, pursued, and prosecuted as well as the way in which terrorists and their defenders have responded to federal prosecutorial efforts. The specific ways in which federal agencies respond to terrorism, however, are rooted in much larger political and social issues.

American Terrorism and Governmental...

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_97
  • Chapter length: 10 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   4,350.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-1-4614-5690-2
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   5,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Recommended Reading and References

  • Ashcroft J (2002) Ashcroft fact sheet on new FBI investigative guidelines. Politechbot.com, September 21, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley-Engen MS, Engen RL, Shields C, Damphousse KR Smith BL (2011) The time penalty: examining the relationship between time to conviction and trial vs. plea disparities in sentencing. Justice Q, pp 1–29. doi:10.1080/07418825.2011.624112

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesney R (2007) Federal prosecution of terrorism-related cases: conviction and sentencing data in light of the “data reliability” and “soft sentence” critiques. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=1005478

  • Elliff J (1979) The reform of FBI intelligence operations. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Bureau of Investigation (1998) Terrorism in the United States. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg K (Ed) (2011) Terrorism Trial Report Card: September 11, 2001 - September 11, 2011. Retrieved from Center for Law and Security, New York School of Law: http://www.lawandsecurity.org/Portals/o/Documents/TTRC%20Ten%20Year.

  • Hearings before the subcommittee on administrative practice and procedure of the committee of the judiciary on FBI statutory charter (1978) 95th Cong, 2d sess, June–Sept. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp 98–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingraham B, Tokoro K (1969) Political crime in the United States and Japan: a comparative study. Issues Criminol 4:145–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson S (2011) Measuring intervention success in countering terrorism, thesis (defended May 2011 University of Arkansas). Unpublished manuscript

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley CM, Davis JK (1987) Kelley: the story of an FBI director. Andrews, McMeel, and Parker Publishing, Kansas City

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Attorney General (1983) Attorney general’s guidelines on domestic security/terrorism investigations. Office of the Attorney General, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Perl R (2003) Terrorism, the future, and American foreign policy. Issue brief for congress, order code IB95112, Foreign Affairs, Trade and Research Division

    Google Scholar 

  • Poveda J (1990) Lawlessness and reform: the FBI in transition. Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell C, Miller B (1977) Profile of a terrorist. Terror Int J 1:17–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields CA (2008) An analysis of prosecutorial and defense strategies in federal terrorism trials from 1980 to 2004 dissertation (defended December 2008), UMI Number: 3341235

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields CA (2012) American terrorism trials: prosecutorial and defense strategies. LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC (print release September 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith B (1994) Terrorism in America: pipe bombs and pipe dreams. State University of New York Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith B, Damphousse K (1998) Terrorism, politics, and punishment: a test of structural-contextual theory and the “liberation hypothesis”. Criminology 36(1):67–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith B, Morgan K (1994) Terrorists right and left: empirical issues in profiling American terrorists. Stud Confl Terror 17:39–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith B, Shields CA, Damphousse K (2011) Patterns of intervention in federal terrorism cases Year 2 Progress Report, June 2011, for DHS project via the START Center of Excellence, University of Maryland: Creation and Analysis of an Integrated U.S. Security Database (IUSSD), BAA number 08-01

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith L, Damphousse K (1996) Punishing political offenders: The effect of political motive on federal sentencing decisions. Criminology 34(3):86

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern J (1999) The ultimate terrorists. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, p 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Transactional Record Access Clearinghouse (2003) Criminal terrorism enforcement since the 9/11/01 attacks. A TRAC Special Report, 8 Dec found at http://trac.syr.edu/tracreports/terrorism/report031208.html

  • Turk A (1982) Political criminality. Sage, Beverley Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Defense, Office of Joint Chiefs of Staff Joint Publication 1-02: Department of defense dictionary of military and associated terms. United States Department of Defense, Washington, DC, 12 Apr 2001 – As amended through 5 June 2003, p 531

    Google Scholar 

  • Uniting and strengthening America by providing appropriate tools required to intercept and obstruct terrorism act, (P.L. 107-56) enacted, Oct 2001

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brent L. Smith .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Smith, B.L., Shields, C., Damphousse, K.R. (2014). US Responses to Terrorists. In: Bruinsma, G., Weisburd, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_97

Download citation