Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice

2014 Edition
| Editors: Gerben Bruinsma, David Weisburd

International Crime Victimization Survey

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_444

Overview

Surveys of people’s experience of crime are now well established. They go under various titles – “crime,” “victims,” or “victimization” surveys. This entry places the International Crime Victimization Survey (ICVS) in the context of the development of other victimization surveys. It discusses the ICVS from the point of view of its main rationale for making international comparisons. It also looks at what has been done on the survey front in terms of international comparisons outside the context of the ICVS and what might be in store for the future.

Victimization surveys have focused on various types of potential victims, although most take a nationally representative sample of people living in private households, as is the case with the ICVS. Those sampled are asked whether they have recently been a victim of crime, regardless of whether the victimization was reported to the police. By including non-reported crimes, victimization surveys provide a different (and larger) count...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Recommended Reading and References

  1. Aebi M, Aromaa K, Aubusson de Cavarlay B, Barclay G, Gruszczynska B, von Hofer H, Hysi V, Jehle J-M, Killias M, Smit P, Tavares C (2006) European Sourcebook of Crime and Criminal Justice Statistics 2006. http://www.europeansourcebook.org
  2. Alvazzi del Frate A (1998) Victims of crime in the developing world. UNICRI, Rome, Publication 57Google Scholar
  3. Alvazzi del Frate A (2004) The international business survey: findings from nine central-eastern European cities. Eur J Crim Policy Res 10:137–161Google Scholar
  4. Bussman K-D, Werle M (2006) First findings from a global survey of economic crime. Br J Criminol 46:1128–1144Google Scholar
  5. EU-MIDIS (2009) European union minorities and discrimination survey: main results report. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (fra.europa.eu/eu-midis)Google Scholar
  6. Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen H, Ellsberg M, Heise L, Watts C (2005) World Health Organisation multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women: initial results on prevalence, health outcomes and women’s responses. World Health Organisation, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  7. Goudriaan H (2004) Reporting to the police in western countries: a theoretical analysis of the effects of social context. Justice Q 21(4):933–969Google Scholar
  8. Gruszczyńska B (2004) Crime in central and eastern European countries in the enlarged Europe. Eur J Crim Policy Res 10:123–136Google Scholar
  9. Gruszczynska B, Gruszczynski M (2005) Crime in enlarged Europe: comparison of crime rates and victimization risks. Transit Stud Rev 12:1337–1345Google Scholar
  10. Hindelang MJ, Gottfreson MR, Garofalo J (1978) Victims of personal crime: an empirical foundation for a theory of personal victimization. Ballinger, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  11. Kangaspunta K (2000) Secondary analysis of integrated sources of data. In: Alvazzi del Frate A, Hatalak O, Zvekic U (eds) Surveying crime: a global perspective. ISTAT/UNICRI, RomeGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnson H, Ollus N, Nevala S (2008) Violence against women. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Kury H, Obergfell-Fuchs JM, Würger M (2002) Methodological problems in victim surveys: the example of the ICVS. Int J Comp Criminol 2(1):38–56Google Scholar
  14. Lynch J (2006) Problems and promise of victimization surveys for cross-national research. In: Tonry M, Farrington D (eds) Crime and justice: an annual review. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 229–287, Volume 34Google Scholar
  15. Mayhew P (2007) Researching the state of crime: national and international and local surveys. In: King R, Wincup E (eds) Doing research on crime and justice, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Percy A, Mayhew P (1997) Estimating sexual victimisation in a national crime survey: a new approach. Stud Crime Prev 6:125–150Google Scholar
  17. PricewaterhouseCoopers (2005) Global economic crime survey 2005. In collaboration with Martin Luther UniversityGoogle Scholar
  18. Scherpenzeel A (2001) Mode effects in panel surveys: a comparison of CAPI and CATI. Bundesamt fűr Statistik, NeuenbergGoogle Scholar
  19. Smith MD (1989) Women abuse: the case for surveys by telephone. J Int Violence 4:308–324Google Scholar
  20. Van Dijk JJM (2009) Approximating the truth about crime. www.crimprev.eu
  21. Van Dijk JJM (2008) The world of crime; breaking the silence on problems of crime, justice and development across the world. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  22. Van Dijk JJM (1999) The experience of crime and justice. In: Newman G (ed) Global report on crime and justice. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 25–41Google Scholar
  23. Van Dijk JJM, Chanturia T (2011) The remarkable case of Georgia. Ministry of Justice of Georgia, TbilisiGoogle Scholar
  24. Van Dijk JJM, Tseloni M (2012) International trends in victimization and recorded crime. In: van Dijk JJM, Farrell G and Tseloni M (eds) The international crime drop: new directions in research. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  25. Van Dijk JJM, Manchin R, Van Kesteren J, Hideg G (2007) The burden of crime in the EU: a comparative analysis of the European crime and safety survey (EU ICS) 2005. Gallup Europe, Brussels, http://www.europeansafetyobservatory.eu/downloads/EUICS_The%20Burden%20of%20Crime%20in%20the%20EU.pdf. Last accessed 11 July 2010
  26. Van Dijk JJM, Mayhew P, Killias M (1990) Experiences of crime across the world: key findings of the 1989 international crime survey. Kluwer, DaventerGoogle Scholar
  27. Van Dijk JJM, Toornvliet LG (1996) Towards a Eurobarometer of public safety. Paper presented at the seminar on the prevention of urban delinquency linked to drug dependence. European Commission, Brussels, NovemberGoogle Scholar
  28. Van Dijk JJM, Van Kesteren JN, Smit P (2008) Criminal victimisation in international perspective: key findings from the 2004-2005 ICVS and EU ICS. Boom Legal Publishers, The Hague, http://rechten.uvt.nl/icvs/pdffiles/ICVS2004_05.pdf. Last accessed 11 July 2011

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Crime and Justice Research Centre, Victoria University of WellingonWellingtonNew Zealand
  2. 2.Human Security and Safety International Victimology InstituteTilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands