Skip to main content

Integrating Rational Choice and Other Theories

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:

Synonyms

Choice theory; Decision making theory; Rational choice theory; Theoretical integration

Overview

This entry will discuss the integration of rational choice theory with other theoretical perspectives in developing a better understanding of why individuals engage in various criminal activities. Both the strengths and weaknesses of such integration will be examined.

Fundamentals/Historical Context

Rational Choice theory, also known as reasonable action theory or choice theory, is a perspective of human behavior that is based on the assumption that individuals will naturally make decisions of whether or not to act in a specific situation in order to maximize their pleasure or benefits, while minimizing potential pain or punishment. This perspective readily lends itself to integration with other theories of crime, given that it can be applied to virtually every type of activity (including all conventional activities as well). The fact that rational choice theory was originally...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   4,350.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   4,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Recommended Reading and References

  • Assaad J, Exum ML (2002) Understanding intoxicated violence from a rational choice perspective. In: Piquero A, Tibbetts S (eds) Rational choice and criminal behavior. Routledge, New York, pp 65–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman R, Paternoster R, Ward S (1992) The rationality of sexual offending: testing a deterrence/rational choice conception of sexual assault. Law Soc Rev 26:343–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornish D, Clarke R (1986) The reasoning criminal: rational choice perspectives on offending. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis L, Walsh A (1999) Criminologists’ opinions about causes and theories of crime and delinquency. The Criminologist 24:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson M, Hirschi T (1990) A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Grasmick H, Bursik R (1990) Conscience, significant others, and rational choice: extending the deterrence model. Law Soc Rev 24:837–861

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi T (1969) Causes of delinquency. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz J (1988) Seductions of crime. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenstein G, Nagin D, Paternoster R (1997) The effect of sexual arousal on expectations of sexual forcefulness. J Res Crime Delinq 34:443–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Messner S, Krohn M, Liska A (1989) Theoretical integration in the study of deviance and crime: problems and prospects. State University of New York Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagin D, Paternoster R (1993) Enduring individual differences and rational choice theories of crime. Law Soc Rev 27:467–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Paternoster R, Simpson S (1996) Sanction threats and appeals to morality: testing a rational choice model of corporate crime. Law Soc Rev 30:378–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Paternoster R, Saltzman L, Waldo G, Chiricos T (1983) Perceived risk and social control: do sanctions really deter? Law Soc Rev 17:457–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Piquero A, Tibbetts S (1996) Specifying the direct and indirect effects of low self-control and situational factors in offenders’ decision making: toward a more complete model of rational offending. Justice Quart 13:481–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Piquero A, Paternoster R, Pogarsky G, Loughran T (2011) Elaborating the individual difference component in deterrence theory. Annu Rev Law Soc Sci 7:335–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson S, Piquero N, Paternoster R (2002) Rationality and corporate offending decisions. In: Piquero A, Tibbetts S (eds) Rational choice and criminal behavior. Routledge, New York, pp 25–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibbetts S, Gibson C (2002) Individual propensities and rational decision-making: recent findings and promising approaches. In: Piquero A, Tibbetts S (eds) Rational choice and criminal behavior. Routledge, New York, pp 3–24

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen G. Tibbetts .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Tibbetts, S.G. (2014). Integrating Rational Choice and Other Theories. In: Bruinsma, G., Weisburd, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_400

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_400

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5689-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5690-2

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics