Skip to main content

Criminal Defense Profession

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice

Overview

A defendant’s right to legal counsel in a criminal prosecution is one of the most familiar of the Constitution’s due process protections. In 1963, the Supreme Court declared in Gideon v. Wainwright that

There are few defendants charged with crime, few indeed, who fail to hire the best lawyers they can get to prepare and present their defenses. That government hires lawyers to prosecute and defendants who have the money hire lawyers to defend are the strongest indications of the widespread belief that lawyers in criminal courts are necessities, not luxuries.

This entry reviews the criminal defense profession. The first section reviews the historical origins of counsel in the English legal system, tracing its evolution into colonial courts. The history of the American legal profession is marked by the rapid changes of a nation that adjusted, over the course of a few generations, to political independence, frontier expansion, abolition of slavery, immigration, and the Industrial...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 4,350.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 4,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Recommended Reading and References

  • Benner L, Lynch B (1973) The other face of justice. National Legal Aid and Defenders Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics (2011) Occupational employment statistics. http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.pdf

  • Casper J (1971) Did you have a lawyer when you went to court? No, I had a public defender. Yale Rev Law Soc Action 1:4–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Casper J, Tyler T, Fisher B (1988) Procedural justice in felony cases. Law Soc Rev 22:483–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen T (2011) Who’s better at defending criminals? Does type of defense attorney matter in terms of producing favorable case outcomes. US Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC, Working Paper Series. http://freealexander.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/SSRN-id1876474.pdf

  • Davies A, Worden A (2009) State politics and the right to counsel: a comparative analysis. Law Soc Rev 43:187–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Donahue C Jr (1964) An historical argument for right to counsel during police interrogation. Yale Law J 73:1000–1057

    Google Scholar 

  • Drinan C (2009) The third generation of indigent defense litigation. N Y Univ Rev Law Soc Change 33:33–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrhard S (2008) Plea bargaining and the death penalty: an exploratory study. Just Sys J 29:313

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichman C (1966) Impact of the Gideon decision upon crime and sentencing in Florida. Florida Division of Corrections Research and Statistics Section, Tallahassee

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg T, Johnson S (2003) Implicit racial attitudes of death penalty lawyers. DePaul Law Rev 53:1539–1556

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmelman D (1996) Trial by plea bargain. Law Soc Rev 30:335

    Google Scholar 

  • Flemming R (1988) Client games: defense attorney perspectives on their relations with clients. Am Bar Assoc Res J 1988:253–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Flemming R, Nardulli P, Eisenstein J (1992) The craft of justice: politics and work in criminal court communities. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman L (2007) History of American law, 3rd edn. Simon & Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Galanter M (2005) Lowering the bar: lawyer jokes and legal culture. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson R, Ostrom B, Hewitt W, Lomvardias C (1992) Indigent defenders get the job done and done well. National Center for State Courts, Williamsburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley R, Miller H, Spohn C (2010) Did you get what you pay for? Type of counsel and its effect on criminal court outcomes. J Crim Justice 38:1063–1070

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinz J, Laumann E (1994) Chicago lawyers: the social structure of the bar, revised. Russell Sage Foundation and Chicago: American Bar Foundation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinz J, Nelson R, Sandefur R, Laumann E (2005) Urban lawyers: the new social structure of the bar. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Houlden P, Balkin S (1985) Cost and quality of indigent defense: ad hoc vs coordinated assignment of the private bar within a mixed system. Justice Sys J 10:159–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar R (2005) An analysis of the performance of Federal Indigent Defense Counsel. Princeton University, working paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton L, Farole D (2010) State public defender programs, 2007 NCJ 228229. Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre L (1987) The public defender: the practice of law in the shadows of repute. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association for Legal Professionals (2006) Employment patterns – 1982–2004. NALP Bulletin, June 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemsen C (2004) Emotional trials: moral dilemmas of women criminal defense attorneys. Northeastern University Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RH (1919) Justice and the poor. Carnegie Foundation, New York, Bulletin # 13

    Google Scholar 

  • Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics (1977) Washington DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics

    Google Scholar 

  • Spangenberg Group website: http://www.spangenberggroup.com/

  • Tata C (2007) In the interests of clients or commerce? Legal aid, supply, demand, and ‘ethical indeterminacy’ in criminal defense work. J Law Soc 34:489–519

    Google Scholar 

  • Worden A (1993) Counsel for the poor: an evaluation of contracting for indigent criminal defense. Justice Q 10:613–637

    Google Scholar 

  • Worden A (1998) Representing the accused: professional values and professional choices of small-town lawyers. Crim Just Rev 23:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Worden A, Worden R (1989) Local politics and the provision of indigent defense counsel. Law Policy 11:410–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Worden A, Davies A, Brown E (2010–2011) A patchwork of policies: Justice, due process, and public defense across American states. Albany Law Rev 74:1423–1463

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alissa Pollitz Worden .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Worden, A.P., Davies, A.L.B. (2014). Criminal Defense Profession. In: Bruinsma, G., Weisburd, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5689-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5690-2

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics