Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice

2014 Edition
| Editors: Gerben Bruinsma, David Weisburd

Social Network Analysis of Organized Criminal Groups

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_239

Overview

This entry discusses the state of the art in the application of network analysis methods to the study of organized criminal groups. It provides an overview of the development of the field from both the academic and law enforcement perspective and discusses the current approaches in the literature. Particular attention is given to methodological issues (data sources, type of network analysis) and to the discussion of the limitations of the application of social network analysis to criminal organizations. In the light of the current state of the art, the entry also discusses the recurrent claim that network analysis may help the law enforcement agencies to more efficiently disrupt criminal networks. Finally, it attempts to identify the future trends in the application of network methods in the study of organized crime, while suggesting some promising paths from both a research and policy perspective.

Introduction

The use of social network analysis (SNA) in criminology is a...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Recommended Reading and References

  1. Albini JL (1971) The American mafia; Genesis of a legend. Sociology series. Appleton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Berlusconi G (2013) Do all the pieces matter? Assessing the reliability of law enforcement data sources for the network analysis of wire taps. Global Crime 14(1):61–81.Google Scholar
  3. Boivin R (2011) Drug trafficking networks in the world economy. In: Montréal. http://www.erdr.org/textes/boivin.pdf
  4. Bouchard M, Ouellet F (2011) Is small beautiful? The link between risks and size in illegal drug markets. Glob Crime 12(1):70–86Google Scholar
  5. Bouchard M, Descormiers K, Gallupe O, Wang W (2010) Panel: analyzing illegal drug supply chains as 2-mode social networks. Paper presented at the crime and social institutions, 62nd annual meeting of the American society of criminology, San Francisco, 17 NovemberGoogle Scholar
  6. Bright DA, Hughes CE, Chalmers J (2012) Illuminating dark networks: a social network analysis of an Australian drug trafficking syndicate. Crime Law Soc Change 57(2):151–176. doi:10.1007/s10611-011-9336-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Calderoni F (2012) The structue of drug traffcking mafias: The Ndrangheta and Cocaine. Crime Law Soc Change 58(3):321–349.Google Scholar
  8. Campana P (2011) Eavesdropping on the mob: the functional diversification of mafia activities across territories. Eur J Criminol 8(3):213–228Google Scholar
  9. Carrington PJ (2011) Crime and social network analysis. In: Scott JP, Carrington PJ (eds) The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. SAGE Publications, London, pp 236–255Google Scholar
  10. Davis RH (1981) Social network analysis: an aid in conspiracy investigations. FBI Law Enforce Bull 50(12):11–19Google Scholar
  11. Harper WR, Harris DH (1975) The application of link analysis to police intelligence. Hum Factors 17(2):157–164Google Scholar
  12. Heber A (2009) The networks of drug offenders. Trends Organ Crime 12(1):1–20Google Scholar
  13. Ianni FAJ (1973) Ethnic succession in organized crime: summary report. U.S. Government Printing Office, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  14. Ianni FAJ, Reuss-Ianni E (1990) Network analysis. In: Andrews PP, Peterson MB (eds) Criminal intelligence analysis. Palmer Enterprises, Loomis, pp 67–84Google Scholar
  15. Lupsha P (1980) Steps toward a strategic analysis of organized crime. The Police Chief 47:36–38Google Scholar
  16. Lupsha P (1983) Networks Vs. networking: analysis of an organized crime group. In: Waldo GP (ed) Career criminals. Sage, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
  17. Malm AE, Bichler G (2011) Networks of collaborating criminals: assessing the structural vulnerability of drug markets. J Res Crime Delinq 48:271–297Google Scholar
  18. Malm AE, Kinney JB, Pollard NR (2008) Social network and distance correlates of criminal associates involved in illicit drug production. Secur J 21(1–2):77–94Google Scholar
  19. Malm AE, Bichler G, Van De Walle S (2009) Comparing the ties that bind criminal networks: is blood thicker than water? Secur J 23(1):52–74Google Scholar
  20. Malm AE, Bichler G, Nash R (2011) Co-offending between criminal enterprise groups. Glob Crime 12(2):112–128. doi:10.1080/17440572.2011.567832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mastrobuoni G, Patacchini E (2010) Understanding organized crime networks: evidence based on federal bureau of narcotics secret files on American mafia. Carlo Alberto notebooks 152. Collegio Carlo Alberto, MoncalieriGoogle Scholar
  22. Morselli C (2005) Contacts, opportunities, and criminal enterprise. University of Toronto Press, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  23. Morselli C (2009) Inside criminal networks. Studies of organized crime. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Morselli C, Petit K (2007) Law-enforcement disruption of a drug importation network. Glob Crime 8(2):109–130Google Scholar
  25. Morselli C, Roy J (2008) Brokerage qualifications in ringing operations. Criminology 46(1):71–98Google Scholar
  26. Natarajan M (2000) Understanding the structure of a drug trafficking organization: a conversational analysis. In: Mangai N, Mike H (eds) Illegal drug markets: from research to prevention policy, vol 11, Crime prevention studies. Criminal Justice Press/Willow Tree Press, Monsey, pp 273–298Google Scholar
  27. Natarajan M (2006) Understanding the structure of a large heroin distribution network: a quantitative analysis of qualitative data. J Quant Criminol 22(2):171–192Google Scholar
  28. Papachristos AV, Smith CM (2011) The small world of Al Capone: the embedded nature of criminal and legitimate social networks. In: Third annual illicit networks workshop, Montréal. http://www.erdr.org/textes/papachristos_smith.pdf
  29. Sparrow MK (1991) Network vulnerabilities and strategic intelligence in law enforcement. Int J Intell Counter Intel 5(3):255–274Google Scholar
  30. Varese F (2006) The structure of a criminal network examined: the Russian mafia in Rome. Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 21/2006Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TranscrimeUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilanItaly