Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice

2014 Edition
| Editors: Gerben Bruinsma, David Weisburd

Near Repeats and Crime Forecasting

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_210

Overview

It has been recognized for some time that crime clusters at a range of spatial scales. It is also well established that offenses cluster in time such that crime occurrence is more likely at particular times of the day, week, month, or year. More recently, a growing body of evidence has started to accumulate that indicates that crime also clusters in time and space, such that when an event occurs at one location, there is a temporary elevation in the probability that other events will occur nearby. Where crimes occur at the exact same location, this is referred to as repeat victimization, and where they occur at nearby locations, near-repeat victimization. Finding that the risk of crime diffuses in space has implications for crime forecasting. However, this type of work is in its infancy and naturally, many questions remain unanswered. For example, there is something of a disconnect in methodological terms between those techniques that are used to detect crime patterns and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Recommended Reading and References

  1. Andresen MA, Felson M (2010) The impact of co-offending. Br J Criminol 50(1):66Google Scholar
  2. Ashton J, Brown I, Senior B, Pease K (1998) Repeat victimisation: offender accounts. Int J Risk Secur Crime Prev 3:269–280Google Scholar
  3. Bernasco W (2008) Them Again? Same-Offender Involvement in Repeat and Near Repeat Burglaries. Eur J Criminol 5(4):411–431Google Scholar
  4. Bowers KJ, Johnson SD (2005) Domestic burglary repeats and space-time clusters. Eur J Criminol 2(1):67Google Scholar
  5. Bowers KJ, Johnson SD, Pease K (2004) Prospective hot-spotting. Br J Criminol 44(5):641Google Scholar
  6. Clarke RV, Cornish DB (1985) Modeling offenders’ decisions: a framework for research and policy. Crime Just 6:147Google Scholar
  7. Everson S, Pease K (2001) Crime against the same person and place: detection opportunity and offender targeting. Crime Prev Stud 12:199–220Google Scholar
  8. Farrell G, Pease P (1994) Crime seasonality: domestic disputes and residential burglary in Merseyside 1988–90. Br J Criminol 34(4):487Google Scholar
  9. Groff ER, Weisburd D, Yang SM (2010) Is it important to examine crime trends at a local “micro” level?: a longitudinal analysis of street to street variability in crime trajectories. J Quant Criminol 26(1):7–32Google Scholar
  10. Harries KD, Stadler SJ, Zdorkowski RT (1984) Seasonality and assault: explorations in inter-neighborhood variation, Dallas 1980. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 74(4):590–604Google Scholar
  11. Johnson SD (2008) Repeat burglary victimisation: a tale of two theories. J Exp Criminol 4(3):215–240Google Scholar
  12. Johnson SD (2010) A brief history of the analysis of crime concentration. Eur J Appl Math 21(4–5):349–370Google Scholar
  13. Johnson SD, Bowers KJ (2004a) The burglary as clue to the future. Eur J Criminol 1(2):237Google Scholar
  14. Johnson SD, Bowers KJ (2004b) The stability of space-time clusters of burglary. Br J Criminol 44(1):55Google Scholar
  15. Johnson SD, Braithwaite A (2009) Spatio-temporal modelling of insurgency in Iraq. Criminal Justice Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson SD, Bowers K, Hirschfield A (1997) New insights into the spatial and temporal distribution of repeat victimization. Br J Criminol 37(2):224Google Scholar
  17. Johnson SD, Bernasco W, Bowers KJ, Elffers H, Ratcliffe J, Rengert G, Townsley M (2007a) Space–time patterns of risk: a cross national assessment of residential burglary victimization. J Quant Criminol 23(3):201–219Google Scholar
  18. Johnson SD, Birks DJ, McLaughlin L, Bowers KJ, Pease K (2007) Prospective crime mapping in operational context, final report. Home Office online report, London, UK, 19, 07–08Google Scholar
  19. Johnson SD, Bowers KJ, Birks DJ, Pease K (2009a) Predictive mapping of crime by ProMap: accuracy, units of analysis, and the environmental backcloth. In: Weisburd WBD, Bruinsma G (eds) Putting crime in its place. Springer, London, pp 171–198Google Scholar
  20. Johnson SD, Summers L, Pease K (2009b) Offender as forager? A direct test of the boost account of victimization. J Quant Criminol 25(2):181–200Google Scholar
  21. Knox G (1964) Epidemiology of childhood leukaemia in northumberland and durham. Brit J Prev Soc Med 18:17–24Google Scholar
  22. Lockwood B (2012) The presence and nature of a near-repeat pattern of motor vehicle Theft. Secur J 25:38–56Google Scholar
  23. Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27(2 Pt 1):209Google Scholar
  24. McGloin JM, Sullivan CJ, Piquero AR (2009) Aggregating to versatility? Br J Criminol 49(2):243–264Google Scholar
  25. Mohler G, Short M, Brantingham P, Schoenberg F, Tita G (2011) self-exciting point process modeling of crime. J Am Stat Assoc 106(493):100–108Google Scholar
  26. Mohler GO (2011) Self-exciting point process modeling of crime. J Am Stat Assoc 106:100–108. doi:10.1198/jasa.2011.ap09546Google Scholar
  27. Morgan F (2001) Repeat burglary in a Perth suburb: indicator of short-term or long-term risk? Crime Prev Stud 12:83–118Google Scholar
  28. Pease K (1998) Repeat victimisation: taking stock. Home Office, London, p 48, ISBN 1-84082-089-6Google Scholar
  29. Pitcher AB, Johnson SD (2011) Exploring theories of victimization using a mathematical model of burglary. J Res Crime Delinq 48(1):83Google Scholar
  30. Ratcliffe JH (2002) Aoristic signatures and the spatio-temporal analysis of high volume crime patterns. J Quant Criminol 18(1):23–43Google Scholar
  31. Ratcliffe JH, Rengert GF (2008) Near-repeat patterns in Philadelphia shootings. Secur J 21(1):58–76Google Scholar
  32. Rey SJ, Mack EA, Koschinsky J (2011) Exploratory space–time analysis of Burglary patterns. J Quant Criminol 28:1–23Google Scholar
  33. Sagovsky A, Johnson SD (2007) When does repeat burglary victimisation occur? Aust N Z J Criminol 40(1):1Google Scholar
  34. Short M, D’Orsogna M, Brantingham P, Tita G (2009) Measuring and modeling repeat and near-repeat burglary effects. J Quant Criminol 25(3):325–339Google Scholar
  35. Summers L, Johnson SD, Rengert G (2010) The use of maps in offender interviews. In: Bernasco W (ed) Offender on Offending: Learning About Crime from Criminals. Cullompton: WillanGoogle Scholar
  36. Tobler WR (1970) A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Econ Geogr 46:234–240Google Scholar
  37. Townsley M, Homel R, Chaseling J (2003) Infectious burglaries. A test of the near repeat hypothesis. Br J Criminol 43(3):615Google Scholar
  38. Townsley M, Johnson SD, Ratcliffe JH (2008) Space time dynamics of insurgent activity in Iraq. Secur J 21(3):139Google Scholar
  39. Trickett A, Osborn DR, Seymour J, Pease K (1992) What is different about high crime areas? Br J Criminol 32(1):81Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Security and Crime ScienceUniversity College LondonLondonUK