Skip to main content

Reentry Courts

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 118 Accesses

Overview

Reentry courts are “specialized courts that help reduce recidivism and improve public safety through the use of judicial oversight to apply graduated sanctions and positive reinforcement, to marshal resources to support the prisoner’s reintegration, and to promote positive behavior by the returning prisoners (Bureau of Justice Assistance 2010).” An estimated 26 reentry courts and 29 reentry drug courts were in operation as of December 31, 2009 (Huddleston and Marlowe 2011). These courts are intended to address the critical needs of returning prisoners – particularly in the period immediately following release – through the combination of judicial oversight and a collaborative case management process. Reentry courts take many forms, with substantial variation along key dimensions of program design, including the mechanism for jurisdictional authority, target population, whether the court is a stand-alone model or combined with a drug court, and the point of entry into the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   4,350.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   4,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Recommended Reading and References

  • Aubin M (2009) The district of oregon reentry court: an evidence-based model. Fed Sentencing Rep 22(1):39–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke PB (2001) Collaboration for successful prisoner reentry: the role of parole and the courts. Correct Manag Q 5(3):11–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Justice Assistance (1997) Defining drug courts: the key components. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Washington, DC, NCJ 205621

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Justice Assistance (2010) Second chance act state, local, and tribal reentry courts FY2010 competitive grant announcement. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Washington, DC, OMB No. 1121-0329. http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/BJA/grant/10SecondChanceCourtsSol.pdf

  • Close DW, Alltucker K, Aubin M et al (2008) The District of Oregon Reentry Court: Evaluation, Policy Recommendations, and Replication Strategies. United States District Court – District of Oregon. http://www.ussc.gov/Education_and_Training/Annual_National_Training_Seminar/2009/008c_Reentry_Court_Doc.pdf

  • Farole D (2003) The harlem parole reentry court evaluation: implementation and preliminary impacts. Center for Court Innovation, New York, http://www.courtinnovation.org/sites/default/files/harlemreentryeval.pdf

  • Gebelein RS (2003) Delaware’s reentry drug court: a practical approach to substance abusing offenders. Paper prepared for the conference on European Perspectives on Drug Courts. http://courts.delaware.gov/Superior/pdf/Reentry_France_27Mar03.pdf

  • Glaze L (2007) Probation and parole in the United States, 2006. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC, NCJ 220218

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaze L, Bonczar TP (2010) Probation and parole in the United States, 2009. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC, NCJ 231674

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton Z (2010) Do reentry courts reduce recidivism? Results from the Harlem parole reentry court. Center for court innovation. http://www.courtinnovation.org/sites/default/files/Reentry_Evaluation.pdf

  • Huddleston C, Marlowe D (2011) Painting the current picture: a national report card on drug courts and other problem-solving court programs in the United States. National Drug Court Institute, Alexandria, http://www.ndci.org/sites/default/files/nadcp/PCP%20Report%20FINAL.PDF

  • Hughes TA, Wilson DJ, Beck AJ (2001) Trends in State parole, 1990-2000. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC, NCJ 184735

    Google Scholar 

  • Langan P, Levin D (2002) Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994. US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC, NCJ 193427

    Google Scholar 

  • Lattimore PK, Visher C (2009) The multi-site evaluation of SVORI: summary and synthesis. Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist C, Hardison J, Lattimore P (2004) The reentry court initiative: court-based strategies for managing released prisoners. Justice Res Policy 6(1):97–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Maruna S, LeBel T (2003) Welcome home? Examining the “reentry court” concept from a strengths-based perspective. West Criminol Rev 4(2):91–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Justice Programs (1999) Reentry courts: managing the transition from prison to community, a call for concept papers. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson-Nelson D (2009) Allen county community corrections – reentry court program impact evaluation. School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne, http://www.allencountycorrections.com/pdfs/reports/ReEntry%20Court%20Impact%20Evaluation%2002 %2004%2009.pdf

  • Petersilia J (2003) When prisoners come home: parole and prisoner reentry. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tauber J (2008) State prison based models. http://www.reentrycourtsolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/STATE-PRISON-BASED-MODELS.pdf

  • Tauber J (2009) A state reentry/drug court proposal: a means to achieve correctional reform. http://www.reentrycourtsolutions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/A-state-reentry-drug-court-proposal.pdf

  • Tauber J, Huddleston CW (1999) Reentry drug courts: closing the gap. National Drug Court Institute, Alexandria

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis J (2000) But they all come back: rethinking prisoner reentry. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Washington, DC, Sentencing & Corrections: Issues for the 21st Century, No. 7

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis J (2005) But they all come back: facing the challenges of prisoner reentry. Urban Institute Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis J, Petersilia J (2001) Reentry reconsidered: a new look at an old question. Crime Delinq 47:291–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis J, Visher C (eds) (2005) Prisoner reentry and crime in America. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler T (1988) The social psychology of procedural justice. Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • West HC, Sabol WIJ, Greenman SJ (2010) Prisoners in 2009. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC, NCJ 231675

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson RA, Bucholtz GA, Siegfried GM et al. (2004) “Prison reform through offender reentry: a partnership between courts and corrections”. Pace Law Review. Paper 10. http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/lawrev/10

  • Wolf RV (2011) Reentry courts: looking ahead: a conversation about strategies for offender reintegration. Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC, U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine H. Lindquist .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Lindquist, C.H., Herrschaft, B.A., Lattimore, P.K. (2014). Reentry Courts. In: Bruinsma, G., Weisburd, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_202

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_202

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5689-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5690-2

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics