Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice

2014 Edition
| Editors: Gerben Bruinsma, David Weisburd

International Responses to Victims in Criminal Justice

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_130

Synonyms

Overview

In recent years, victims of crime have moved from the peripheries of both academic and policy discussions concerning criminal justice to become at least rhetorically “central” in modern criminal justice policies in many developed states (Hall 2010). This entry examines some of the newest territory into which victims and victimology are now moving, and, in so doing, it is argued that traditional criticisms espoused by victimologists, namely, that official recognition of victims often fails to account for victims’ own perspectives, remain extremely pertinent to this debate. In addition, this entry examines how the scope of “victimization” is expanding, with many commentators now adopting a “social harm” approach to the question of victimization rather than limiting themselves to restrictive, legalistic categories. Nevertheless, it is argued that the classification of such individuals...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Recommended Reading and References

  1. Ayres I, Braithwaite J (1992) Responsive regulation: transcending the deregulation debate. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell S, McGillivray D (2008) Environmental law, 7th edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Bottigliero I (2004) Redress for victims of crimes under international law. Martinus Nijhoff, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradford B (2011) Voice, neutrality and respect: use of victim support services, procedural fairness and confidence in the criminal justice system. Criminol Crim Justice 11(4):345–366Google Scholar
  5. Bryant B (1995) Environmental justice. Island Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  6. Edwards I (2004) An ambiguous participant: the crime victim and criminal justice decision-making. Brit J Criminol 44:967–982Google Scholar
  7. Elias R (1986) The politics of victimization: victims, victimology and human rights. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Gunther-Moor G, Peters T, Ponsaers P, Shapland J, van Stokkom B (eds) (2009) Restorative policing. Journal of Police Studies 2/Cahier Politiestudies Cahier no. 11. Maklu, AntwerpGoogle Scholar
  9. Hall M (2010) Victims and policy making: a comparative approach. Willan, CullomptonGoogle Scholar
  10. Hamlyn B, Phelps A, Turtle J, Sattar G (2004) Are special measures working? Evidence from a survey of vulnerable and intimidated witnesses, Home office research study 283. Home Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Hillyard P, Toombs D (2003) Introduction. In: Hillyard P, Toomb D, Pantazis C (eds) Beyond criminology: taking harm seriously. Pluto Press, London, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  12. Hoyle C, Young R, Hill R (2002) Proceed with caution: an evaluation of the Thames valley police initiative in restorative cautioning. Joseph Rowntree Trust, YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Hulsman L (1986) Critical criminology and the concept of crime. In: Bianachi H, van Swaaningen R (eds) Abolitionism. Towards a non-repressive approach to crime. Free University Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  14. Hutter B (1997) Compliance: regulation & environment. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. International Criminal Court (2002) Rules of procedure and evidence. International Criminal Court, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  16. Kauzlarich D, Matthews R, Miller W (2001) Toward a victimology of the state. Crit Criminol 10:173–194Google Scholar
  17. Kearon T, Godey B (2007) Setting the scene: a question of history. In: Walklate S (ed) Handbook of victims and victimology. Willan, Cullompton, pp 17–36Google Scholar
  18. Latimer J, Dowden C, Muise D (2005) The effectiveness of restorative justice practices: a meta-analysis. Prison J 85:127–144Google Scholar
  19. Lynch M, Burns R, Stretesky P (2010) Global warming and state-corporate crime: the politicalization of global warming under the Bush administration. Crime Law Soc Change 54:213–239Google Scholar
  20. Paternoster R, Deise J (2011) A heavy thumb on the scale: the effect of victim impact evidence on capital decision making. Criminology 49(1):129–161Google Scholar
  21. Roberts J, Manikis M (2011) Victim personal statements: a review of empirical research. Report for the  Commissioner for Victims and Witnesses in England and Wales. Ministry of Justice, London. Available at http://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/news/press-releases/victims-com/vps-research.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2012
  22. Shapland J, Hall M (2007) What do we know about the effects of crime on victims? Int Rev Victimol 13:175–218Google Scholar
  23. Shapland J, Hall M (2010) Victims at court: necessary accessories or principal players at centre stage? In: Bottoms AE, Roberts J (eds) Hearing the victim: adversarial justice, crime victims and the state. Willan, Cullompton, pp 169–188Google Scholar
  24. Shapland J, Robinson G, Sorsby A (2011) Restorative justice in practice. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Sherman L, Strang H (2007) Restorative justice: the evidence. Smith Institute, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Strang H (2002) Repair or revenge: victims and restorative justice. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  27. Van Dijk J, van Kesteren J, Smit P (2007) Criminal victimization in international perspective. WODC report 127. Ministerie van Justitie, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  28. Wemmers J-A (2009) Victim and the International Criminal Court (ICC): evaluating the success of the ICC with respect to victims. Int Rev Victimol 16:211–252Google Scholar
  29. White R (2008) Crimes against nature: environmental criminology and ecological justice. Willan, CullomptonGoogle Scholar
  30. Williams C (1996) An environmental victimology. Soc Sci 23:16–40, reprinted in R White (ed) Environmental Crime: A Reader, Cullompton: Willan Publishing at 200-22Google Scholar
  31. Zinsstag E, Teunkens M, Pali B (2011) Conferencing: a way forward for restorative justice in Europe. Report to the European Union. European Forum for Restorative Justice, LeuvenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of LawUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK