Abstract
Some simplified numerical methods for damage predictions in metal forming process modeling and optimization are presented in this chapter. The incremental approaches including advanced damage models lead to accurate results, but the simulations are tedious and time-consuming. An efficient solving algorithm called inverse approach (IA) allows the fast modeling of forming processes in only one step between the known final part and the initial blank, avoiding the contact treatment and the incremental plastic integration. To improve the stress estimation in the IA, the so-called pseudo-inverse approach (PIA) has been developed. Some intermediate configurations are geometrically created and corrected by a free surface method to consider the deformation path, and the plastic integration based on the flow theory is carried out incrementally to consider the loading history. A simplified 3D strain-based damage model is coupled with the plasticity and implemented into a direct scalar integration algorithm of plasticity (without local iterations), which makes the plastic integration very fast and robust even for very large strain increments. These simplified approaches lead to very fast and useful numerical tools in the preliminary design and optimization.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
N. Aravas, The analysis of void growth that leads to central burst during extrusion. J. Mech. Phys. Solid 34, 55–79 (1986)
M. Azaouzi, H. Naceur, A. Delameziere, J.L. Batoz, S. Belouettar, An heuristic optimization algorithm for the blank shape design of high precision metallic parts obtained by a particular stamping process. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 44, 842–850 (2008)
F. Barlat, J.C. Brem, J.W. Yoon, K. Chung, R.E. Dick, D.J. Lege, F. Pourboghrat, S.–.H. Choi, E. Chu, Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets–Part I: theory. Int. J. Plast. 19, 1297–1319 (2003)
J.L. Batoz, G. Dhatt, Modélisation des structures par éléments fini, vol. 1, 3 (Edition HERMES, Paris, 1990)
P. Breitkopf, H. Naceur, A. Rassineux, P. Villon, Moving least squares response surface approximation: formulation and metal forming applications. Comput. Struct. 83(17–18), 1411–1428 (2005)
M. Brunet, F. Sabourin, S. Mguil-Touchal, The prediction of necking and failure in 3d sheet forming analysis using damage variable. J. Phys. III 6, 473–482 (1996)
F. Castro Catarina, C. António Carlos, C. Sousa Luisa, Pareto-based multi-objective hot forging optimization using a genetic algorithm, in 2nd International Conference on Engineering Optimization, Lisbon, 2010
J.L. Chaboche, Continuum damage mechanics I-general concepts. II-damage growth, crack initiation, and crack growth. ASME Trans. J. Appl. Mech. 55, 59–72 (1988)
M. Chebbah, H. Naceur, A. Gakwaya, A fast algorithm for strain prediction in tube hydroforming based on one-step inverse approach. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 211(11), 1898–1906 (2011)
A. Cherouat, Y.Q. Guo, K. Saanouni, Y.M. Li, K. Debray, G. Loppin, Incremental versus inverse numerical approaches for ductile damage prediction in sheet metal forming. Int. J. Form. Process. 7(1–2), 99–122 (2004)
J.P. Cordebois, P. Ladevèze, Necking criterion applied in sheet metal forming, in Plastic Behavior of Anisotropic Solids, ed. by J.P. Boehler (Editions CNRS, Paris, 1985)
K. Deb, An efficient constraint handling method for genetic algorithms. Comput. Method Appl. Mech. Eng. 186(2–4), 311–338 (2000)
M. Dong, K. Debray, Y.Q. Guo, J.L. Shan, Design and optimization of addendum surfaces in sheet metal forming process. Int. J. Comput. Method. Eng. Sci. Mech. 8(4), 211–222 (2007)
M. Emmerich, K. Giannakoglou, B. Naujoks, Single- and multiobjective evolutionary optimization assisted by Gaussian random field metamodels. IEEE Trans. Evolut. Comput. 10(4), 421–439 (2006)
L. Fourment, T. Balan, J.L. Chenot, Optimal design for nonsteady-state metal forming processes – I shape optimization method. Int. J. Numer. Method Eng. 39(1), 33–65 (1996)
J.C. Gelin, J. Oudin, Y. Ravalard, An imposed finite element method for the analysis of damage and ductile fracture in cold metal forming processes. Ann CIRP 34(1), 209–213 (1985)
J.C. Gelin, C. Labergère, S. Thibaud, Recent advances in process optimization and control for the design of sheet and tube hydroforming processes, in Numisheet, Detroit, edited by L.M. Smith et al., Vol. A, pp. 825–830, 2005
Y.Q. Guo, J.L. Batoz, J.M. Detraux, P. Duroux, Finite element procedures for strain estimations of sheet metal forming parts. Int. J. Numer. Method Eng. 30, 1385–1401 (1990)
Y.Q. Guo, W. Gati, H. Naceur, J.L. Batoz, An efficient DKT rotation free shell element for springback simulation in sheet metal forming. Comput. Struct. 80(27–30), 2299–2312 (2002)
Y.Q. Guo, Y.M. Li, F. Bogard, K. Debray, An efficient pseudo-inverse approach for damage modeling in the sheet forming process. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 151(1–3), 88–97 (2004)
A.L. Gurson, Porous rigid-plastic materials containing rigid inclusions – yield function, plastic potential and void nucleation, in Proceedings of the Conference on Fracture, vol. 2, pp. 357–364, 1977
A. Halouani, Y.M. Li, B. Abbès, Y.Q. Guo, An axisymmetric inverse approach for cold forging modelling. Eng. Lett. 18(4), 376–383 (2010)
A. Halouani, Y.M. Li, B. Abbès, Y.Q. Guo, Simulation of axi-symmetrical cold forging process by efficient pseudo inverse approach and direct algorithm of plasticity. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 61, 85–96 (2012a)
A. Halouani, Y.M. Li, B. Abbès, Y.Q. Guo, F.J. Meng, C. Labergere, P. Lafon, Optimization of forging preforms by using pseudo inverse approach. Key Eng. Mater. 504–506, 613–618 (2012b)
C.S. Han, R.V. Grandhi, R. Srinivasan, Optimum design of forging die shapes using nonlinear finite element analysis. AIAA J. 31(4), 774–781 (1993)
P. Hartley, S.E. Clift, J. Salimi, C.E.N. Sturgess, I. Pillinger, The prediction of ductile fracture initiation in metalforming using a finite element method and various fracture criteria. Res. Mech. 28, 269–293 (1989)
T. Jansson, A. Anderson, L. Nilsson, Optimization of draw-in for an automotive sheet metal part: an evaluation using surrogate models and response surfaces. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 159(3), 426–434 (2005)
M. Jansson, L. Nilsson, K. Simonsson, Tube hydroforming of aluminium extrusions using a conical die and extensive feeding. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 198(1–3), 14–21 (2008)
N. Kim, S. Kobayashi, Preform design in H-shape cross section axisymmetric forging by finite element method. Int. J. Mach. Tool Manuf. 30, 243–268 (1990)
S. Kirkpatrick, C.D. Gelatt, M.P. Vecchi, Optimization by Simulated Annealing. Science, New Series. 220(4598), 671–680 (1983)
S. Kobayashi, S.I. Oh, T. Altan, Metal Forming and Finite Element Method (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1989)
C.H. Lee, H. Huh, Blank design and strain estimation for sheet metal forming processes by a finite element inverse approach with initial guess of linear deformation. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 82, 145–155 (1998)
H. Lee, K.E. Peng, J. Wang, An anisotropic damage criterion for deformation instability and its application to forming limit analysis of metal plates. Eng. Fract. Mech. 21(5), 1031–1054 (1985)
J. Lemaître, J.L. Chaboche, Mechanics of Solid Materials (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990)
Y.M. Li, B. Abbès, Y.Q. Guo, Two efficient algorithms of plastic integration for sheet forming modeling. ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 129, 698–704 (2007)
J.F. Mariage, K. Saanouni, P. Lestriez, A. Cherouat, Numerical simulation of ductile damage in metal forming processes: a simple predictive model. Part I. Theoretical and numerical aspects. Int. J. Form. Process 5(2–3–4), 363–376 (2002)
K. Mathur, P. Dawson, Damage evolution modeling in bulk forming processes, in Computational Methods for Predicting Material Processing Defects (Elsevier, Predeleanu, 1987)
M.D. McKay, W.J. Conover, R.J. Beckman, A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 21, 239–245 (1979)
F.J. Meng, C. Labergere, P. Lafon, Methodology of the shape optimization of forging dies. Int. J. Mater. Form 3(Suppl 1), 927–930 (2010)
F. Meng, Multi-objective optimization of several stages forging by using advanced numerical simulation and Meta-model, PhD thesis, Université de Technologie de Troyes. (2012)
N. Metropolis, A.W. Rosenbluth, M.N. Rosenbluth, A.H. Teller, E. Teller, Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087–1092 (1953)
R. Myers, D. Montgomery, Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, 2nd edn. (Wiley, New York, 2002). ISBN 0-471-41255-4
H. Naceur, Optimisation de forme de structures minces en grandes transformations, Edition EUE, ISBN-13: 978-613-1-54700-3, p. 240, (2010)
H. Naceur, Y.Q. Guo, W. Gati, New enhancements in the inverse approach for the fast modeling of autobody stamping process. Int. J. Comput. Eng. Sci. 3(4), 355–384 (2002)
H. Naceur, Y.Q. Guo, J.L. Batoz, C. Knopf-Lenoir, Optimization of drawbead restraining forces and drawbead design in sheet metal forming process. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 43(10), 2407–2434 (2001)
H. Naceur, Y.Q. Guo, S. Ben-Elechi, Response surface methodology for design of sheet forming parameters to control springback effects. Comput. Struct. 84, 1651–1663 (2006)
B. Nayrolles, G. Touzot, P. Villon, Generalizing the Finite Element Method: Diffuse approximation and diffuse elements. Comput. Mech. 10, 307–318 (1992)
E. Onate, M. Kleiber, Plastic and viscoplastic flow of void containing metal – applications to axisymmetric sheet forming problem. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 25, 237–251 (1988)
P. Picart, O. Ghouati, J.C. Gelin, Optimization of metal forming process parameters with damage minimization. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 80–81, 597–601 (1998)
G. Rousselier, Ductile fracture models and their potential in local approach of fracture. Nucl. Eng. Des. 105(1), 97–111 (1987)
K. Saanouni, Damage Mechanics in Metal Forming. Advanced Modeling and Numerical Simulation (ISTE/Wiley, London, 2012). ISBN 978-1-8482-1348-7
K. Saanouni, J.L. Chaboche, Computational damage mechanics, application to metal forming, in Comprehensive Structural Integrity, Chapter 7, ed. by R. de Borst, H.A. Mang. Numerical and Computational Methods, vol. 3 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2003)
K. Saanouni, K. Nesnas, Y. Hammi, Damage modeling in metal forming processes. Int. J. of Damage Mechanics. 9(3), 196–240 (2000)
T. Santner, B. Williams, W. Notz, The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments (Springer, New York, 2003)
O. Schenk, M. Hillmann, Optimal design of metal forming die surfaces with evolution strategies. Comp. Struct. 82, 1695–1705 (2004)
H.B. Shim, K.C. Son, Optimal blank shape design by sensitivity method. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 104, 191–199 (2000)
J.C. Simo, R.L. Taylor, A return mapping algorithm for plane stress elastoplasticity. Int. J. Numer. Method Eng. 22, 649–670 (1986)
D. Vieilledent, L. Fourment, Shape optimization of axisymmetric preform tools in forging using a direct differentiation method. Int. J. Numer. Method Eng. 52, 1301–1321 (2001)
G. Zhao, E. Wright, R.V. Grandhi, Preform die shape design in metal forming using an optimization method. Int. J. Numer. Method Eng. 40(7), 1213–1230 (1997)
G. Zhao, X. Ma, X. Zhao, R.V. Grandhi, Studies on optimization of metal forming processes using sensitivity analysis methods. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 147, 217–228 (2004)
Y.Y. Zhu, S. Cescotto, A.M. Habraken, A fully coupled elastoplastic damage modeling and fracture criteria in metal forming processes. J. Meter. Process. Technol. 32, 197–204 (1992)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this entry
Cite this entry
Guo, YQ., Li, Y., Abbès, B., Naceur, H., Halouani, A. (2015). Damage Prediction in Metal Forming Process Modeling and Optimization: Simplified Approaches. In: Voyiadjis, G. (eds) Handbook of Damage Mechanics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5589-9_41
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5589-9_41
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5588-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5589-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering