Skip to main content

Empathy

  • Reference work entry

Introduction

As a contemporary cultural and psychological phenomenon, there is little doubt that empathy is a concept of importance in most areas of information construction, dissemination and inquiry—scientific, literary, and civic. Its prominence in both academia and public discourse is supported by two relatively simple observations: (1) the proliferation of popularized scientific writing on empathy in relation to the brain and mirror neurons (e.g., Iacoboni, 2009; Ramachandran, 2011) and (2) its suggested role in most topics related to human (and nonhuman) relationships, culture, and functioning.

A short list exemplifying empathy’s role in several aspects of modern societal discourse might include its centrality in political-civic discourse (e.g., as a central moral concept in the agenda of US President Barak Obama; see Obama, 2006); its integration into democratic and political decision-making processes (e.g., Morrell, 2010); its representation in business in relation to customer...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Agosta, L. (2010). Empathy in the context of philosophy. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett-Lennard, G. T. (1997). The recovery of empathy: Toward others and self. In A. C. Bohart & L. S. Greenberg (Eds.), Empathy reconsidered: New directions in psychotherapy (pp. 103–121). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social psychological answer. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D. (2009). These things called empathy: Eight related but distinct phenomena. In J. Decety & W. Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 3–15). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D. (2012). The empathy altruism hypothesis: Issues and implications. In J. Decety (Ed.), Empathy: From bench to bedside (pp. 41–54). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, C. (1979). Communication research and African national development. Journal of Black Studies, 10, 218–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohart, A. C., & Greenberg, L. S. (Eds.). (1997). Empathy reconsidered: New directions in psychotherapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boler, M. (1997). The risk of empathy: Interrogating multiculturalism’s gaze. Cultural Studies, 11, 253–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calloway-Thomas, C. (2010). Empathy in the global world: An intercultural perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chlopan, B. E., McCain, M. L., & Carbonell, J. L. (1985). Empathy: Review of available measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 635–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Code, L. (1991). What can she know? Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Code, L. (1995). Rhetorical spaces: Essays on gendered locations. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coplan, A. (2011). Understanding empathy: Its features and effects. In A. Coplan & P. Goldie (Eds.), Empathy: Philosophical and psychological perspectives (pp. 3–18). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwall, S. (1998). Empathy, sympathy, and care. Philosophical Studies, 89, 261–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex (1st ed., Vols. 1 & 2) London: John Murray. Retrieved from http://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Freeman_TheDescentofMan.html

  • Davis, M. H. (1996). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis O. L., Jr., Yeager, E. A., & Foster, S. J. (Eds.). (2001). Historical empathy and perspective taking in the social studies. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F. B. M. (2008). Putting the altruism back into altruism: The evolution of empathy. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 279–300.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F. B. M. (2009). The age of empathy: Nature’s lessons for a kinder society. Toronto, Canada: McClelland & Stewart.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F. B. M. (2012). Empathy in primates and other mammals. In J. Decety (Ed.), Empathy: From bench to bedside (pp. 87–106). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decety, J. (2011). The neuroevolution of empathy. Annals New York Academy Science, 1231, 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decety, J. (Ed.). (2012). Empathy: From bench to bedside. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decety, J., & Ickes, W. (Eds.). (2009). The social neuroscience of empathy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3, 71–100.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duan, C., & Hill, C. E. (1996). The current state of empathy research. Journal Counseling Psychology, 43, 261–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N. (2000). Empathy and sympathy. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotion (2nd ed., pp. 677–691). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., & Strayer, J. (Eds.). (1987). Empathy and its development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrow, T. F. D., & Woodruff, P. W. R. (Eds.). (2007). Empathy in mental illness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S. (2012). Empathy, simulation, and narrative. Science in Context, 25, 355–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallese, V. (2011). Neuroscience and phenomenology. Phenomenology Mind, 1, 33–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladstein, G. (1984). The historical roots of contemporary empathy research. Journal History Behavioral Sciences, 20, 38–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (2006, October 10). Friends for life: An emerging biology of emotional healing. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/10/health/psychology/10essa.html

  • Gordon, M. (2007). Roots of empathy: Changing the world, child by child. Toronto, Canada: Thomas Allen Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. New York: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenier, F., & Lüthi, A. (2010). Mouse brains wired for empathy. Nature Neuroscience, 13, 406–408.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, A. (2001). Dilthey, empathy and verstehen: A contemporary reappraisal. European Journal Social Theory, 4, 311–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1993). Emotional contagion. Current Directions Psychological Science, 2, 96–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermberg, K. (2006). Husserl’s phenomenology: Knowledge, objectivity and others. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. R. (2003). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling (20th anniversary ed., with new afterword). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge, UK: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1968). A treatise of human nature (3rd ed., H. A. Selby-Bigge, Ed.). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press. (Original work published in 1739).

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacoboni, M. (2009). Mirroring people: The science of empathy and how we connect with others. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ickes, W. (2003). Everyday mind reading. New York: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaggar, A. M., & Bordo, S. R. (Eds.). (1992). Gender/body/knowledge: Feminist reconstructions of being and knowing. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahoda, G. (2005). Theodor Lipps and the shift from sympathy to empathy. Journal History Behavioral Sciences, 4, 151–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kögler, H. H. (1996). The power of dialogue: Critical hermeneutics after Gadamer and Foucault (P. Hendrickson, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Kögler, H. H., & Stueber, K. R. (Eds.). (2000). Empathy and agency: The problem of understanding in the human sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanzoni, S. (2009). Practicing psychology in the art gallery: Vernon Lee’s aesthetics of empathy. Journal History Behavioral Sciences, 44, 330–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanzoni, S. (2012). Empathy in translation: Movement and image in the psychological laboratory. Science in Context, 25, 301–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipps, T. (1979). Empathy, inner imitation and sense-feelings (M. Schertel & M. Radar, Trans.). In M. Rader (Ed.), A modern book of esthetics (5th ed., pp. 374–382). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. (Original work Einfühlung, Innere Nachahmung und Organempfindung. Archiv für gesamte Psychologie, 1, 465–519, published 1903).

  • Makkreel, R. (2000). From simulation to structural transposition: A Dilthey and critique of empathy and defense of Verstehen. In H. H. Kögler & K. R. Stueber (Eds.), Empathy and agency: The problem of understanding in the human sciences (pp. 181–193). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallgrave, H. F., & Ikonomou, E. (Eds.). (1994). Empathy, form and space: Problems in German aesthetics (pp. 1873–1893). Santa Monica, CA: Getty Center for the History of Art and the Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrell, M. E. (2010). Empathy and democracy: Feeling, thinking, and deliberation. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obama, B. (2006). The audacity of hope: Thoughts on reclaiming the American dream. New York: Crown Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, G. (2010, June 26). Empathy & neuropolitics: This is your brain on neoliberal culture. Any questions? ZNet [Online Forum]. Retrieved from http://www.zcommunications.org/empathy-and-neuropolitics-by-gary-olson.

  • Orange, D. M. (2002). There is no outside: Empathy and authenticity in psychoanalytic process. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 19, 686–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormiston, G. L., & Schrift, A. D. (Eds.). (1990). The hermeneutic tradition: From Ast to Ricoeur. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, R. E. (1969). Hermeneutics; interpretation theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patnaik, D., & Mortensen, P. (2009). Wired to care: How companies prosper when they create widespread empathy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, P. B., Crethar, H. C., & Carlson, J. (2008). Inclusive cultural empathy: Making relationships central in counseling and psychotherapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, S. D., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. The Behavioral Brain Sciences, 25, 1–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V. S. (2011). The tell-tale brain: A neuroscientist’s quest for what makes us human. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanchandran, V. S. (2006). Mirror neurons and the brain in the vat. Edge [Online discussion forum] Retrieved from http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/ramachandran06/ramachandran06_index.html

  • Rifkin, J. (2009). The empathic civilization: The race to global consciousness in a world in crisis. New York: Penguin Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheler, M. (1970). The nature of sympathy (P. Heath, Trans. & W. Stark, Intro, 5th ed.). Hamden, CT: Archon Books. (Original work published 1913).

  • Schleiermacher, F. D. E. (1990). The hermeneutics: Outlines of the 1819 lectures (J. Wojcik & R. Haas, Trans.). In G. L. Ormiston & A. D. Schrift (Eds.), The hermeneutic tradition: From Ast to Ricoeur (pp. 85–100). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. (Original work published as III: Die Kompendienartige Darstellung von 1819. In H. Kimmerle (1974) Hermeneutik. Heidelberg, Germany: Carl Winter).

  • Shlien, J. M. (1997). Empathy in psychotherapy: A vital mechanism? Yes. Therapist’s conceit? All too often. By itself enough? In A. C. Bohart & L. S. Greenberg (Eds.), Empathy reconsidered: New directions in psychotherapy (pp. 63–80). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, T. (2006). The neuronal basis and ontogeny of empathy and mind reading: Review of literature and implications for future research. Neuroscience Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 855–863.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, N. (2011, February 6). The fountain of old age. The New York Times (Business Section), pp. 1, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinigaglia, C. (2008). Mirror neurons: This is the question. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 15, 70–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1982). A theory of moral sentiments. In: D. D. Raphael & A. L. Macfie (Eds.), Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Classics. (Original work published 1759).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein E. (1989). On the problem of empathy (3rd rev. ed., W. Stein, Tran.). Washington, DC: ICS Publication. (Original work published 1917).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolorow, R., & Atwood, G. (1992). Contexts of being: The intersubjective foundations of psychological life. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stueber, K. R. (2006). Rediscovering empathy: Agency, folk psychology, and the human sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stueber, K. R. (2008). Empathy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/empathy/.

  • Titchener, E. B. (1909). Experimental psychology of the thought-processes. New York: MacMillan Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trout, J. D. (2009). The empathy gap: Building bridges to the good life and the good society. New York: Viking Penguin Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verducci, S. (2000). A conceptual history of empathy and a question it raises for moral education. Educational Theory, 50, 63–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetlesen, A. J. (1994). Perception, empathy, and judgment: An inquiry into the preconditions of moral performance. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, F. (2009). Brainhood: Anthropological figure of modernity. History Human Sciences, 22, 6–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrecko, S. (2010). Neuroscience, power and culture: An introduction. History Human Sciences, 23, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wispé, L. (1987). History of the concept of empathy. In N. Eisenberg & J. Strayer (Eds.), Empathy and its development (pp. 17–37). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wispé, L. (1991). The psychology of sympathy. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, D. (2001). Beyond empathy. Phenomenological approaches to intersubjectivity. Journal Consciousness Studies, 8, 151–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, D. (2005). Subjectivity and selfhood: Investigating the first-person perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, D. (2008). Simulation, projection and empathy. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 514–522.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, D., & Overgaard, S. (2012). Empathy without isomorphism: A phenomenological account. In J. Decety (Ed.), Empathy: From bench to bedside (pp. 3–20). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marissa Barnes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Barnes, M. (2014). Empathy. In: Teo, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_91

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_91

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5582-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5583-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics