Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology

2014 Edition
| Editors: Thomas Teo

Educational Standardized Testing

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_622

Introduction

This entry concerns standardized quantitative testing in educational systems. Testing is an extensive part of educational systems throughout the world. In standardized quantitative testing, tests are generally developed centrally and thereby in a context removed from everyday educational practice. Standardized quantitative testing in educational systems is often politically initiated, whether at the national, regional, or district level, and can be mandatory for all relevant educational institutions under this jurisdiction. In this entry, the field of testing will both be enlighten from its own logic and in the last part, testing will be discussed from a critical perspective which questions the assumptions that testing rests on.

Definition

Standardized educational testing is a specific type of assessment, traditionally termed summative assessment. Summative assessment sums up the learner’s achievement level, for example, upon completion of an educational program … and it...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Ali, A., & Ali, U. (2010). Educational measurement and testing: Historical perspectives. Journal of Educational Research. Retrived 8 Oct 2013 from http://www.iub.edu.pk/jer/JOURNAL/JER_Vol13_No2.pdf.
  2. Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind. How psychology found its language (pp. 66–84). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Dreier, O. (1999). Læring som ændring af personlig deltagelse i sociale kontekster [Learning as changing personal participation in social contexts]. In K. Nielsen & S. Kvale (Eds.), Mesterlære [Apprenticeship learning] (pp. 76–99). Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
  4. Dreier, O. (2007). Generality and particularity of knowledge. In V. V. Deventer, M. T. Blanche, E. Fourie, & P. Segalo (Eds.), Citizen city (pp. 188–196). Ontario, Canada: Captus University Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Ecclestone, K. (2003). Understanding assessment and qualifications in post-compulsory education. Leicester: NIACE.Google Scholar
  6. Giordano, G. (2005). How testing came to dominate American schools: The history of educational assessment. New York: Peter Lang Publishing (Chapter 1).Google Scholar
  7. Gould, S. J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  8. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Holmen, M. G., & Docter, R. F. (1972). Educational and psychological testing. A study of the industry and its practices (pp. 1–15). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  10. Holzkamp, K. (2012, In Press). Psychology: Social self-understanding on the reasons for action in the everyday conduct of life. In U. Osterkamp, & E. Schraube (Eds.), Turning psychology upside down. Writings of Klaus Holzkamp. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Holzkamp, K. (2013). Psychology from the standpoint of the subject. In E. Scraube & U. Osterkamp (Eds.), Selected writings of Klaus Holzkamp. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Mind, mathematics and culture of everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Lave, J. (1996 [1993]). The practice of learning. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice. Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 3–32). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Lave, J., & McDermott, R. (2002). Estranged labor learning. Outlines, 4(1), 19–48.Google Scholar
  15. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Madaus, G. F., Stufflebeam, D., & Scriven, M. S. (1991[1983]). Program evaluation: A historical overview. In G. F. Madaus, M. S. Scriven, & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models. viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (pp. 3–22). (Ninth printing). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. McNeil, L. M. (2000). Contradictions of school reform. Educational costs of standardized testing. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Nunes, T., Schliemann, A. D., & Carraher, D. W. (1993). Street mathematics and school mathematics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Self-fulfilling prophecies in the classroom: Teachers’ expectations as unintended determinants of pupils’ intellectual competence. In M. Deutsch, I. Katz, & A. R. Jensen (Eds.), Social class, race and psychological development (pp. 219–253). New York/Chicago/San Francisco/Atlanta/Dallas: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  20. Salomon, G. (Ed.). (1993). Distributed cognitions. Psychological and educational considerations. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Schellenberg, S. J. (2004). Test bias or cultural bias: Have we really learned anything? In J. O’Reilly (Ed.), The achievement gap: Test bias or school structures? National association of test directors 2004 symposia (pp. 1–18). Retrived 8 Oct 2013 from http://datacenter.spps.org/uploads/Test_Bias_Paper.pdf.
  22. Stevens, R. (2010). Learning as a members’ phenomenon: Towards an ethnographically adequate science of learning. In W. R. Penual & K. O’Connor (Eds.), Learning research as human science. New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
  23. Thorndike, R. M., Cunningham, G. K., Thorndike, R. L., & Hagen, E. P. (1991). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education (5th ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. Varenne, H., & McDermott, R. (1998). Successful failure. The school America builds. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  25. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Ydesen, C. (2011). The rise of high-stakes educational testing in Denmark, 1920–1970. Frankfurt A.M: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Education-LearningAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark