Skip to main content

Persons with Disabilities

  • Reference work entry
Book cover Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology
  • 213 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler, A. (1932). What life should mean to you (chapter 2). London: Unwin Books. Retrieved from http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/at/adler.htm.

  • American Psychological Association. (2012). About Division 22. Retrieved from the Div 22 Rehabilitation Psychology website: http://www.apadivisions.org/division-22/about/index.aspx

  • Americans with Disabilities. (1990). Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101–336, 104 Stat. 328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, S. (2009). Delusive discourse: Tracing the conceptual history of disability in India (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (AAT 3394318).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, R. G. (1948). The social psychology of physical disability. Journal of Social Issues, 4(4), 28–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, C. (2012). The social model of disability: Valuable or irrelevant? In N. Watson, A. Roulstone, & A. C. Thomas (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of disability studies (pp. 12–29). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayton, D. C. (1996). Forbidden signs: American culture and the campaign against sign language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braddock, D. L., & Parish, S. L. (2001). An institutional history of disability. In G. L. Albrecht, K. D. Seelman, & M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 1–68). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brault, M. W. (2012). Americans with disabilities: 2010. Current population reports (pp. 70–131). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, T., & Rath, J. F. (2012). Rehabilitation psychology. In E. Altmaier & J. I. Hanson (Eds.), The oxford handbook of counseling psychology (pp. 679–702). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, P. M. (2001). Mapping the family: Disability studies and the exploration of parental response to disability. In G. L. Albrecht, K. D. Seelman, & M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 373–395). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, C. J. (1995). A psychological view of disability culture. Disability Studies Quarterly, 15, 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, C. J. (2001). Divided understandings: The social experience of disability. In G. L. Albrecht, K. D. Seelman, & M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 351–372). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L., & Associates. (1986). The International Center for the Disabled survey of disabled Americans: Bringing disabled Americans into the mainstream (Study No. 854009). New York, NY: International Center for the Disabled.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helander, E. (2003). A critical review of the “International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).” Retrieved from, http://www.einarhelander.com/critical-review-ICF.pdf

  • Hughes, B., & Paterson, K. (1997). The social model of disability and the disappearing body: Towards a sociology of impairment. Disability & Society, 12, 325–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevles, D. (1985). In the name of eugenics: Genetics and the uses of human heredity. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kudlick, C. J. (2003). Disability history: Why we need another other. The American Historical Review, 108(3), 763–793.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linton, S. (1998). Claiming disability: Knowledge and identity. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livneh, H., & Antonak, R. F. (Eds.). (1997). Psychosocial adaptation to chronic illness. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo, P. A. (2008). Three generations, no imbeciles: Eugenics, the supreme court, and Buck v. Bell. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longmore, P. (2003). The second phase: From disability rights to disability culture. In Why I burned my book and other essays on disability (pp. 230–261). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longmore, P. K., & Umansky, L. (Eds.). (2001). The new disability history: American perspectives. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meekosha, H., & Shuttleworth, R. (2009). What’s so ‘critical’ about critical disability studies? Australian Journal of Human Rights, 15(1), 47–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olkin, R. (1999). What psychotherapists should know about disability. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pledger, C. (2003). Discourse on disability and rehabilitation issues: Opportunities for psychology. American Psychologist, 58(4), 279–284.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prilleltensky, O. (2009). Critical psychology and disability studies: Critiquing the mainstream, critiquing the critique. In D. R. Fox, I. Prilleltensky, & S. Austin (Eds.), Critical psychology: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 250–266). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. (2009). Philosophical concerns in critical psychology. In D. R. Fox, I. Prilleltensky, & S. Austin (Eds.), Critical psychology: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 36–53). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trent, J. W. (1994). Inventing the feeble mind: A history of mental retardation in the United States. Berkeley/Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trickett, E. J., Watts, R. J., & Birman, D. (Eds.). (1994). Human diversity: Perspectives on people in context. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN General Assembly. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, 13 December 2006, A/RES/61/106, Annex I. Retrieved from the United Nations Enable website: http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml

  • Vaughan, C. E. (2009). People-first language: An unholy crusade. The Braille Monitor, 52(3). Retrieved at http://www.nfb.org/images/nfb/Publications/bm/bm09/bm0903/bm090309.htm

  • Wendell, S. (1996). The rejected body. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2002). Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health: ICF – The international classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2011). World report on disability 2011. Retrieved from the World Health Organization website at http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789240685215_eng.pdf

  • Wright, B. A. (1960). Physical disability: A psychological approach. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carol J. Gill .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Gill, C.J. (2014). Persons with Disabilities. In: Teo, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_591

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_591

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5582-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5583-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics