Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology

2014 Edition
| Editors: Thomas Teo

Intimate Justice

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_522

Introduction

Intimate justice is a theoretical framework that links experiences of inequity in the sociopolitical domain with how individuals imagine and evaluate the quality of their sexual and relational experiences. Developed initially to guide research on sexual satisfaction (McClelland, 2010, 2011), intimate justice encourages researchers to question how social conditions, such as racial and gender-based stereotypes (Fasula, Carry, & Miller, 2012) and sexual stigma (Herek, 2007), impact what individuals feel they deserve in their intimate lives. In addition to theorizing the impact of social conditions on deservingness, intimate justice encourages a critical engagement with research methods. Specifically, intimate justice argues that research on individuals’ evaluations of their lives – and specifically their levels of satisfaction, well-being, and happiness – should be assessed using measures and methods that always consider both potential group differences and the social...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Cantril, H. (1965). The patterns of human concerns. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Crosby, F. (1982). Relative deprivation and working women. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Diamond, L. M., & Lucas, S. (2004). Sexual-minority and heterosexual youths’ peer relationships: Experiences, expectations, and implications for well-being. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 14(3), 313–340.Google Scholar
  5. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Fasula, A. M., Carry, M., & Miller, K. S. (2012). A multidimensional framework for the meanings of the sexual double standard and its application for the sexual health of young Black women in the U.S. Journal of Sex Research. doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.716874.Google Scholar
  7. Fine, M., & McClelland, S. I. (2006). Sexuality education and desire: Still missing after all these years. Harvard Educational Review, 76(3), 297–338.Google Scholar
  8. Henderson, A., Lehavot, K., & Simoni, J. (2009). Ecological models of sexual satisfaction among lesbian/bisexual and heterosexual women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(1), 50–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Herek, G. M. (2007). Confronting sexual stigma and prejudice: Theory and practice. Journal of Social Issues, 63(4), 905–925.Google Scholar
  10. Major, B., McFarlin, D. B., & Gagnon, D. (1984). Overworked and underpaid: On the nature of gender differences in personal entitlement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1399–1412.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. McClelland, S. I. (2009). Intimate justice: Sexual satisfaction in young adults (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.Google Scholar
  12. McClelland, S. I. (2010a). Intimate justice: A critical analysis of sexual satisfaction. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(9), 663–680.Google Scholar
  13. McClelland, S. I. (2011). Who is the “self” in self-reports of sexual satisfaction? Research and policy implications. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 8(4), 304–320.Google Scholar
  14. Schwartz, P., & Young, L. (2009). Sexual satisfaction in committed relationships. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 6(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  15. Štulhofer, A., Buško, V., & Brouillard, P. (2010). Development and bicultural validation of the new sexual satisfaction scale. Journal of Sex Research, 47(4), 257–268.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Tolman, D. L., Striepe, M. I., & Harmon, T. (2003). Gender matters: Constructing a model of adolescent sexual health. Journal of Sex Research, 40(1), 4.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Online Resources

  1. McClelland, S. I. (2010). Intimate justice: A critical analysis of sexual satisfaction. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 663–680. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00293.x/abstract?deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=&userIsAuthenticated=false
  2. Abraham, L. (2011, November 16). Teaching good sex. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/20/magazine/teaching-good-sex.html?_r=3&ref=magazine&
  3. The Center for Sexual Pleasure & Health. (2011, February 15). Intimate justice review. Retrieved from http://thecsph.org/intimate-justice-review
  4. Mark, K. (2012, March 7). Self reports of sexual satisfaction: Who is the Self? Kinsey Confidential Blog. Retrieved from http://kinseyconfidential.org/reports-sexual-satisfaction/

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departments of Psychology and Women’s StudiesUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA