Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology

2014 Edition
| Editors: Thomas Teo

Space, Overview

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_421

Introduction

Space attained special prominence in early modern philosophy because of its importance in the new science. Immanuel Kant, for example, discussed space and spatiality in his early works on physics and metaphysics. Kant regarded spaces as the appearance of the external relations of unitary monads (Hatfield, 2006). In psychology, the study of space can be traced back to the nineteenth century. William James (1887), in his work The Perception of Space, argued that sensations were directly experienced as spatial in nature. James, in his later reviews, considered that spatial relations were directly experienced as sensations (Farrell, 2011). Since then, the study of space perception developed rapidly. This field within psychology is concerned with how recognition of an object’s physical appearance or its interactions is perceived, for example, by exploring the concepts of visual space, depth perception, movement, form, color, and their interactions. More specialized topics...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  2. Cosgrove, D. (2004). Landscape and landschaft. German Historical Institute Bulletin, 35, 57–71.Google Scholar
  3. Farrell, M. J. (2011). Space perception and William James’s metaphysical presuppositions. History of Psychology, 14(2), 158–173.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gauvain, M. (1993). The development of spatial thinking in everyday activity. Developmental Review, 13, 92–121.Google Scholar
  5. Harvey, D. (1990a). Between space and time: Reflections on the geographical imagination. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 80(3), 418–434.Google Scholar
  6. Harvey, D. (1990b). The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Hatfield, G. (2006). Kant on the perception of space (and time). In P. Guyer (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Kant and modern philosophy (pp. 62–93). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. James, W. (1887). The perception of space. Mind, 12(47), 321–353.Google Scholar
  9. Li, W. W. (2013). Shifting selves in migration: Home, ageing in place and wellbeing. Beijing, China: Central Compilation & Translation Press.Google Scholar
  10. Li, W. W., Hodgetts, D., & Ho, E. (2010). Gardens, transition and identity reconstruction among older Chinese immigrants to New Zealand. Journal of Health Psychology, 15(5), 786–796.Google Scholar
  11. Mark, D. M. (1993). Human spatial cognition. In D. Medyckyj-Scott & H. M. Hearnshaw (Eds.), Human factors in geographical information systems (pp. 51–60). London: Belhaven Press.Google Scholar
  12. Thrift, N. (2006). Space. Theory, Culture & Society, 23, 139–146.Google Scholar
  13. Tuan, Y.-F. (1974). Topophilia: Study of environmental perception, attitudes and values. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Tuan, Y.-F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  15. Van Blerk, L. (2005). Negotiating spatial identities: Mobile perspectives on street life in Uganda. Children’s Geographies, 3(1), 5–21.Google Scholar

Online Resources

  1. Spatial Cognition Priority Programme. http://spp.cosy.informatik.uni-bremen.de/
  2. Spatial Cognition Research Centre. http://iqn.cosy.informatik.uni-bremen.de/index.html
  3. Centre for Spatial Studies. http://www.spatial.ucsb.edu/index.php

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia