Skip to main content
  • 148 Accesses

Introduction

The subject is a perennial issue in the social sciences (Williams, 2001) and certainly one of the most debated. Following the work of René Descartes, its modern philosophical conception attempted to secure a scientific basis for knowledge. In social and political theory, attention shifted to a variety of issues, particularly the liberal concern regarding the relationship between the individual and the state. Psychologically, too, notions of the subject were frequently combined with social and political analysis. After outlining these foundational philosophical, political, and psychological debates, this entry will consider the critique of the subject characteristic of late twentieth century thought, culminating in its so-called “death.” Finally, it will outline contemporary post-Marxist attempts to rethink the notion, particularly with respect to its collective-revolutionary form.

Definition

According to Michel Foucault (1988), there are two meanings of the word subject:...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Althusser, L. (2008). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In L. Althusser (Ed.), On ideology (pp. 1–61). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkins, K. (ed.) (2005). Self and Subjectivity. Oxford. Blackwells.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badiou, A. (2007). Being and event (O. Feltham, Trans.). London/New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1988). The subject and power. Critical Enquiry, 8(summer 1982), 777–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2002). The order of things. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (2001). Complete psychological works (Vol. 19). London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). The phenomenology of spirit (A. V. Miller, Trans.). Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1990). Capital (Vol. 1). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAnulla, S. (2002). Structure and agency. In D. Marsh & G. Stoker (Eds.), Theory and methods in political science. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1989). In S. Collini (Ed.), On liberty and other writings. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (1967). The will to power (W. Kaufmann & R. J. Hollingdale, Trans.). New York: Random House/Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (1970). Freud and philosophy (D. Savage, Trans.). New Haven, CT: YUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J. J. (2012). In V. Gourevitch (Ed.), The social contract and other later political writings. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, P. (2001). From Descartes to Derrida. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. (2001). Contemporary French philosophy: Modernity and the persistence of the subject. London/New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oliver Harrison .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Harrison, O. (2014). Subject. In: Teo, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_302

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_302

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5582-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5583-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics