Skip to main content

Soviet Psychology

  • Reference work entry

Introduction

Soviet psychology is a unique theoretical tradition which emerged and developed in a “special way” during the twentieth century in Soviet Union. Concepts, theories, and approaches emerged in the context of soviet psychology (cultural-historical psychology and activity theory) had significant influences on the development of psychology and scientific discussions in different countries yet again after the collapse of the Soviet Union (see International Society for Cultural and Activity Research website).

Definition

The term “Soviet psychology” refers to a wide range of diverse approaches and trends in the field of psychology which despite significant differences between them have some broad common theoretical and methodological orientations, situated within a specific sociocultural-historical context – in different periods in the USSR’s history. Soviet psychology does not mean merely a geopolitical space, but, mainly a conceptual space created by an attempt to overcome...

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_297
  • Chapter length: 8 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   1,350.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-1-4614-5583-7
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   1,599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

References

  • Bogdanchikov, S. A. (2008). Recent trends of the history of soviet psychology. Voprosy Psychologii, 4, 128–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratus, B. (2000). Russian, soviet, post-soviet psychology. Moscow: Flinta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budilova, E. (1972). Philosophical problems in soviet psychology. Moscow: Hauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s education theory in cultural context (pp. 39–64). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M., & Maltzman, I. (Eds.). (1969). A handbook of contemporary soviet psychology. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, H., Cole, M., & Wertsch, J. (2007). Editors’ introduction. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 1–20). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillen, J. (2000). Versions of Vygotsky. British Journal of Educational Studies, 48(2), 183–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, L. R. (1987). Science, philosophy, and human behavior in the soviet union. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • González Rey, F. L., & Martínez A. M. (2013). Three critical approaches to psychology in Latin America –their rise and fall. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 10, 642–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedegaard, M. (2005). The ZPD as basis for instruction. In H. Daniels (Ed.), An introduction to Vygotsky (pp. 223–247). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozulin, A. (1984). Psychology in utopia toward a social history of soviet psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koltsova, V., & Oleinik, Y. (2004). History of Psychology. Moscow: PYДH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langemeyer, I., & Roth, W.-M. (2006). Is cultural-historical activity theory threatened to fall short of its own principles and possibilities as a dialectical social science. Outlines, 2, 20–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1976). Cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1979). The making of mind: a personal account of soviet psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeish, J. (1975). Soviet psychology. History, theory, context. London: Methuen & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mecacci, L. (1974). Western literature on soviet psychology and physiology of behavior: a selected bibliography. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 9(4), 233–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissen, M. (2000). Practice research: Critical psychology in and through practices. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 2, 145–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos, D. (1996). Observations on Vygotsky’s reception in academic psychology. In C. W. Tolman, F. Cherry, R. V. Hezewijk, & I. Lubek (Eds.), Problems of theoretical psychology (pp. 145–155). Toronto, Canada: Captus University Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, T. (1968). L.S. Rubinstejn and the philosophical foundation of soviet psychology. Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrovsky, А. V., & Yaroshevsky, М. G. (1996). History and theory of psychology (Vol. 1–2). Rostov na Donu: Feniks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sannino, A., Daniels, H., & Guitierrez, K. D. (2009). Activity theory between historical engagement and future-making practice. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. D. Gutierrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 1–15). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. (1998). Klaus Holzkamp and the rise and decline of German critical psychology. History of Psychology, 1(3), 235–253.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Umrikhin, V. (1997). Russian and world psychology. A common origin of divergent paths. In E. Grigorenko, E. L. Grigorenko, P. Ruzgis, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Psychology of Russia: Past, present, future (pp. 17–38). Commack, NY: Nova Science Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (1988). Developmental psychology in the soviet union. Brighton, UK: The Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (1994). From energy to collectivity: A commentary on the development of Bekhterev’s theoretical views. In L. H. Strickland (Ed.), V. M. Bekhterev’s Collective reflexology (pp. xiii–xxiv). Commack, NY: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (1996). Social utopias and knowledge construction in psychology. In V. Koltsova, Y. Oleinik, A. Gilgen, & C. Gilgen (Eds.), Post-soviet perspectives on Russian psychology (pp. 70–84). London: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vassilieva, J. (2010). Russian psychology at the turn of the 21st century and post-soviet reforms in the humanities disciplines. History of Psychology, 13(2), 138–159.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Veer, R. (1990). The reform of soviet psychology: A historical perspective. Studies in Soviet Thought, 40(1–3), 205–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veresov, N. (2010). Forgotten methodology: Vygotsky’s case. In J. Valsiner & A. Toomela (Eds.), Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 years gone astray? (pp. 267–295). Charlotte, NC: IAP Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The historical meaning of the crisis of psychology. In R. Rieber & J. Wolloc (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (Vol. 3, pp. 233–344). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasnitsky, A. (2011). Vygotsky circle as a personal network of scholars: Restoring connections between people and ideas. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 45(4), 422–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zdan, A. (2008). General essay on the history of psychology in Russia. In A. Zdan (Ed.), Russian psychology. An anthology (pp. 3–26). Moscow: Alma-Mater.

    Google Scholar 

Online Resources

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manolis Dafermos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Dafermos, M. (2014). Soviet Psychology. In: Teo, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_297

Download citation