Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology

2014 Edition
| Editors: Thomas Teo

Soviet Psychology

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_297

Introduction

Soviet psychology is a unique theoretical tradition which emerged and developed in a “special way” during the twentieth century in Soviet Union. Concepts, theories, and approaches emerged in the context of soviet psychology (cultural-historical psychology and activity theory) had significant influences on the development of psychology and scientific discussions in different countries yet again after the collapse of the Soviet Union (see International Society for Cultural and Activity Research website).

Definition

The term “Soviet psychology” refers to a wide range of diverse approaches and trends in the field of psychology which despite significant differences between them have some broad common theoretical and methodological orientations, situated within a specific sociocultural-historical context – in different periods in the USSR’s history. Soviet psychology does not mean merely a geopolitical space, but, mainly a conceptual space created by an attempt to overcome...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Bogdanchikov, S. A. (2008). Recent trends of the history of soviet psychology. Voprosy Psychologii, 4, 128–137.Google Scholar
  2. Bratus, B. (2000). Russian, soviet, post-soviet psychology. Moscow: Flinta.Google Scholar
  3. Budilova, E. (1972). Philosophical problems in soviet psychology. Moscow: Hauka.Google Scholar
  4. Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s education theory in cultural context (pp. 39–64). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cole, M., & Maltzman, I. (Eds.). (1969). A handbook of contemporary soviet psychology. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  6. Daniels, H., Cole, M., & Wertsch, J. (2007). Editors’ introduction. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 1–20). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Gillen, J. (2000). Versions of Vygotsky. British Journal of Educational Studies, 48(2), 183–198.Google Scholar
  8. Graham, L. R. (1987). Science, philosophy, and human behavior in the soviet union. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  9. González Rey, F. L., & Martínez A. M. (2013). Three critical approaches to psychology in Latin America –their rise and fall. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 10, 642–662.Google Scholar
  10. Hedegaard, M. (2005). The ZPD as basis for instruction. In H. Daniels (Ed.), An introduction to Vygotsky (pp. 223–247). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Kozulin, A. (1984). Psychology in utopia toward a social history of soviet psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  12. Koltsova, V., & Oleinik, Y. (2004). History of Psychology. Moscow: PYДH.Google Scholar
  13. Langemeyer, I., & Roth, W.-M. (2006). Is cultural-historical activity theory threatened to fall short of its own principles and possibilities as a dialectical social science. Outlines, 2, 20–42.Google Scholar
  14. Luria, A. R. (1976). Cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Luria, A. R. (1979). The making of mind: a personal account of soviet psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. McLeish, J. (1975). Soviet psychology. History, theory, context. London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
  17. Mecacci, L. (1974). Western literature on soviet psychology and physiology of behavior: a selected bibliography. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 9(4), 233–23.Google Scholar
  18. Nissen, M. (2000). Practice research: Critical psychology in and through practices. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 2, 145–179.Google Scholar
  19. Papadopoulos, D. (1996). Observations on Vygotsky’s reception in academic psychology. In C. W. Tolman, F. Cherry, R. V. Hezewijk, & I. Lubek (Eds.), Problems of theoretical psychology (pp. 145–155). Toronto, Canada: Captus University Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Payne, T. (1968). L.S. Rubinstejn and the philosophical foundation of soviet psychology. Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  21. Petrovsky, А. V., & Yaroshevsky, М. G. (1996). History and theory of psychology (Vol. 1–2). Rostov na Donu: Feniks.Google Scholar
  22. Sannino, A., Daniels, H., & Guitierrez, K. D. (2009). Activity theory between historical engagement and future-making practice. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. D. Gutierrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 1–15). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Teo, T. (1998). Klaus Holzkamp and the rise and decline of German critical psychology. History of Psychology, 1(3), 235–253.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Umrikhin, V. (1997). Russian and world psychology. A common origin of divergent paths. In E. Grigorenko, E. L. Grigorenko, P. Ruzgis, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Psychology of Russia: Past, present, future (pp. 17–38). Commack, NY: Nova Science Publisher.Google Scholar
  25. Valsiner, J. (1988). Developmental psychology in the soviet union. Brighton, UK: The Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  26. Valsiner, J. (1994). From energy to collectivity: A commentary on the development of Bekhterev’s theoretical views. In L. H. Strickland (Ed.), V. M. Bekhterev’s Collective reflexology (pp. xiii–xxiv). Commack, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  27. Valsiner, J. (1996). Social utopias and knowledge construction in psychology. In V. Koltsova, Y. Oleinik, A. Gilgen, & C. Gilgen (Eds.), Post-soviet perspectives on Russian psychology (pp. 70–84). London: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  28. Vassilieva, J. (2010). Russian psychology at the turn of the 21st century and post-soviet reforms in the humanities disciplines. History of Psychology, 13(2), 138–159.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Van der Veer, R. (1990). The reform of soviet psychology: A historical perspective. Studies in Soviet Thought, 40(1–3), 205–221.Google Scholar
  30. Veresov, N. (2010). Forgotten methodology: Vygotsky’s case. In J. Valsiner & A. Toomela (Eds.), Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 years gone astray? (pp. 267–295). Charlotte, NC: IAP Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The historical meaning of the crisis of psychology. In R. Rieber & J. Wolloc (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (Vol. 3, pp. 233–344). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  32. Yasnitsky, A. (2011). Vygotsky circle as a personal network of scholars: Restoring connections between people and ideas. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 45(4), 422–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Zdan, A. (2008). General essay on the history of psychology in Russia. In A. Zdan (Ed.), Russian psychology. An anthology (pp. 3–26). Moscow: Alma-Mater.Google Scholar

Online Resources

  1. International Society for Cultural and Activity Research (ISCAR). http://twww.iscar.org/
  2. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology. http://www.mesharpe.com/mall/results1.asp?ACR=RPO

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychology Department, School of Social SciencesUniversity of CreteRethymnoGreece