Skip to main content

Psychometrics

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology
  • 203 Accesses

Introduction

One can scarcely describe psychometric theory and practice without unearthing the history of the discipline of psychology itself. That is to say, the history of psychometrics is tied in important ways to the history of psychology as an independent discipline, as it was largely the promise of subsuming inquires of a psychological nature under a natural science rubric – complete with its quantitative methods – that opened the door for psychology to formally break from philosophy. Moreover, the relationship between substantive psychological theory and psychometric theory has historically been closely entangled, and the two have mutually informed and constrained one another as they have developed over the past century, one consequence of which is that the concept of “psychometrics” extends widely. It refers not only to a body of psychological measurement theory but also to a wide array of methods, instruments, and procedures that are applicable in a broad range of contexts –...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Milsap, R. E. (2008). Doctoral training in statistics, measurement, and methodology in psychology: Replication and extension of Aiken, West, Sechrest, and Reno’s (1990) survey of PhD programs in North America. American Psychologist, 63, 32–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (1954). Technical recommendations for psychological tests and diagnostic techniques. Psychological Bulletin, 51(2, Pt. 2), 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinkhorn, S. F. (1997). Past imperfect, future conditional: Fifty years of test theory. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 50, 175–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borsboom, D. (2006). The attack of the psychometricians. Psychometrika, 71, 425–440.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, N. (1992). Abstract measurement theory and the revolution that never happened. Psychological Science, 3, 186–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G. (1960). Topological methods in cardinal utility theory. In K. J. Arrow, S. Karlin, & P. Suppes (Eds.), Mathematical methods in the social sciences (pp. 16–26). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. A. (1985). Methodology review: Assessing unidimensionality of tests and items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9(2), 139–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D., & Tukey, J. W. (1964). Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maraun, M. D. (1998). Measurement as a normative practice: Implications of Wittgenstein’s philosophy for measurement in psychology. Theory & Psychology, 8, 435–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P. (1981). The dimensionality of tests and items. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 34(1), 100–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michell, J. (1990). An introduction to the logic of psychological measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michell, J. (1997). Quantitative science and the definition of measurement in psychology. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 355–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F. L., Le, H., & Ilies, R. (2003). Beyond alpha: An empirical examination of the effects of different sources of measurement error on reliability estimates for measures of individual differences constructs. Psychological Methods, 8(2), 206–224.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slaney, K. L., & Maraun, M. D. (2008). A proposed framework for conducting data-based test analysis. Psychological Methods, 13(4), 376–390.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slaney, K. L., Tkatchouk, M., Gabriel, S. M., & Maraun, M. D. (2009). Psychometric assessment and reporting practices: Incongruencies between theory and practice. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27(6), 465–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. (1904a). The proof and measurement of association between two things. The American Journal of Psychology, 15, 72–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. (1904b). General intelligence, objectively determined and measured. The American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J. H. (1996). Coming full circle in the history of factor indeterminacy. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31, 617–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trendler, G. (2009). Measurement theory, psychology and the revolution that cannot happen. Theory & Psychology, 19(5), 579–599.

    Google Scholar 

Online Resources

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathleen Slaney .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Slaney, K. (2014). Psychometrics. In: Teo, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_249

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_249

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5582-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5583-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics